![]() |
#1 |
null operator (he/him)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 21,598
Karma: 29709834
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Device: none
|
Suggestion for PI Devs
Current practice for many plugins is to upload beta's to MR and attach them to thread response posts, with luck the beta attachments are deleted when a new beta is issued or a new version is added to the first post - but often they're not.
Can I suggest betas be uploaded into a 'fixed' location in a cloud storage service, and a link to it be posted, then when the new version of the PI is released the developer can delete their last beta from their storage. Note: this is not to reduce MR storage, but to avoid having multiple beta versions sprinkled though plugin threads because they haven't been deleted. BR |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 28,334
Karma: 203719142
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
That assumes all plugin devs have cloud storage they're willing to give others access to. If it was to reduce MR storage, I might understand. Since it isn't, I think plugin devs should be free to do whatever works best for their own workflow and their user base.
What's worse: various betas sprinkled throughout a thread, or links to various betas sprinkled throughout a thread? Or broken links to betas sprinkled around? Any way you slice it, devs would still need to remember to edit posts and delete something where betas are concerned, no? |
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#3 |
null operator (he/him)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 21,598
Karma: 29709834
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Device: none
|
The thread title says "Suggestion", that's all it is; No expectations; no names, no pack-drill
![]() I envisaged dev would upload beta to cloud, subsequent betas would replace…… Once its released they delete the last beta from the cloud. Any links to the beta would issue a 'file not found/404/whatever' message. I worry that users will download buggy betas because they weren't deleted - it's happened a couple of times - over the years ![]() BR |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,185
Karma: 1988646
Join Date: Aug 2015
Device: Kindle
|
Uploading to cloud services does not tell you how many times it has been downloaded, and whether enough people tested it to warrant a release.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
null operator (he/him)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 21,598
Karma: 29709834
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Device: none
|
Then use a file locker like Media Fire, or an FTP server and look at the logs
![]() Do plugin devs really make beta->release decisions based on number of downloads? BR |
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#6 |
Plugin Developer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 6,812
Karma: 4604429
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Midwest USA
Device: Kindle Paperwhite(10th)
|
Yes, actually. If nobody, or very few people have tried a test version my confidence in it is less than if it's been downloaded a dozen times without anyone complaining.
Although I agree with you in principle--one place for test versions is more organized and convenient. However, I, personally, am not interested in using a separate cloud storage for it. I copied using the second post of the thread for test version (from DaltonST, I think) when I renamed FFDL to FFF; which works very well, but requires some prior planning. (Or luck. As I recall, it was just chance that I had also made that second post.) I know mods can move posts between threads, can a mod insert a post owned by the OP up as the second post for this purpose? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 28,334
Karma: 203719142
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
Quote:
![]() Unfortunately, that's not currently possible (that I know of). There's been many times that would come in handy, though! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
|
Xenforo style threadmarks could have been handy here.
But mobileread's software simply orders all posts in a thread by date, and lets you move posts between threads where they promptly get inserted in date order. You'd have to find an innocent post elsewhere within *just* the right range of time to be mugged, brainwashed, and given plastic surgery to look and think like it belongs in the thread at post #2. Personally I find betas interesting, mostly because most plugin devs don't use github or other version control, so often the best you can do for version history is to line up betas and old versions lying around in forgotten config directories. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Guru
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 808
Karma: 2416112
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Poland
Device: Various
|
I have someone else's "innocent" post and its author @bravox's consent to take over #2 of my thread. I would love to see the beta versions of the "LubimyCzytac" plugin. Is it possible to change the author of the post from the user 244251 to 280405?
Thread: https://www.mobileread.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=282922 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
|
Anything is possible if your name is Alexander and you obtain an admin shell prompt for the database...
I suggest it's a better idea to delete that post, though, then post #3 which is yours again, will be #2. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Guru
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 808
Karma: 2416112
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Poland
Device: Various
|
Removal is a good idea.
Then in post #3 (and later #2) I can put both beta versions for LubimyCzytac and the METAmover plugin. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
null operator (he/him)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 21,598
Karma: 29709834
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Device: none
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A word of thanks to all the devs | Barty | Kindle Developer's Corner | 10 | 01-20-2019 12:03 AM |
[DEVs] Firmware Summary | knc1 | Kindle Developer's Corner | 104 | 04-30-2016 03:34 PM |
Touch [Question devs] Will we ever get Custom library? | danskmacabre | Kobo Reader | 4 | 04-02-2012 06:29 PM |
Suggestions for Kindle Devs | jxh11215 | Kindle Developer's Corner | 5 | 03-28-2010 07:35 AM |