![]() |
#1 |
neilmarr
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 7,215
Karma: 6000059
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Monaco-Menton, France
Device: sony
|
iPad V e-ink devices
A fascinating in-depth comparison today of backlit iPad and 'traditional' e-ink readers under all lighting conditions. Personally, the piece reinforces my liking for e-ink, but -- horses for courses -- this is a handy review for those still trying to make up their minds. Best wishes. Neil
http://blogs.zdnet.com/perlow/?p=12719 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,258
Karma: 3439432
Join Date: Feb 2008
Device: Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (300ppi), Samsung Galaxy Book 12
|
Pretty unfair to take the iPad to task for not working in daylight when it's not designed / marketed for such.
If one wants a device to use outdoors, then one should pick a screen suited / designed for such --- an e-ink or transflective LCD (I just picked up a Fujitsu Stylistic 4121 w/ indoor/outdoor screen and am finding it has transformed how I used my Tablet PC). William |
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Evangelist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 446
Karma: 1812
Join Date: Dec 2007
Device: iPhone
|
My biggest gripe with e-ink is needing so much light to read at night in bed or in any low light situation.
I think when someone considers a device, they should look at their own habits and buy the device that fits their habits. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 221
Karma: 801624
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: US Pacific Northwest
Device: LePan II, Kobo Aura
|
Quote:
If it's going to be marketed as an e-reading device it certainly is not unfair to compare it to other e-reading devices; and that includes e-reading device screens. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,258
Karma: 3439432
Join Date: Feb 2008
Device: Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (300ppi), Samsung Galaxy Book 12
|
Fair enough. To clarify, I'm not complaining of comparing it to other e-readers, just think it's ridiculous to complain of it doing something Apple has never indicated it could do.
FWIW, I can't help but wonder if the plethora of SKUs at launch isn't intended to: - ease initial availability difficulties (the 64GB model is the only one available at the local Best Buy) - inure retailers to a large number of SKUs so that they'll be able to cope w/ an enlarged iPad family which (I hope) will include 7" (smaller) and 12" (largest) screen sizes, and (hopefully) a choice of screen types which includes transflective LCDs William |
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#6 | |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,300
Karma: 1121709
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Amazon Kindle 1
|
Quote:
Exactly. I NEVER , EVER read in direct sunlight. I read often in pretty dim lighting. I also seldom ever read for more than an hour or two a day. So for me, while I like my Kindle, a tablet device makes a lot more sense for my needs. Better for dim lighting, can do more than read so it's more useful to someone like me who's not an avid reader compared to most on this site etc. For others who read more, read in sunlight etc., e-ink and other reflective screens are best. So I don't think it's silly to complain about lcd devices not being good in direct sunlight, but to be objective such reviews should also note that e-ink devices aren't great in dim lighting and require hassling with clip on lights etc. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Connoisseur
![]() Posts: 61
Karma: 36
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Reston, Virginia, US
Device: ipad
|
My e-ink device won't even work properly in direct sunlight. Most of the screen looks washed out and it's totally unreadable. If I'm in outdoor light I have to shade the screen when I turn the page to make it legible. So I'm not so sure the "e-ink is readable in sunlight" argument holds a great deal of water. While I can read it in sunlight, I can't turn the page in sunlight.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,300
Karma: 1121709
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Amazon Kindle 1
|
I do think that is just a problem with certain e-ink screens in certain devices has since been fixed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,742
Karma: 32912427
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Device: Kobo H20, Pixel 2, Samsung Chromebook Plus
|
Quote:
I think that if a comparison is being made of all devices which offer eReader functions then it's perfectly reasonable to point out the conditions where they work well and those where they might have issues. Graham |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Connoisseur
![]() Posts: 61
Karma: 36
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Reston, Virginia, US
Device: ipad
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 19,832
Karma: 11844413
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tampa, FL USA
Device: Kindle Touch
|
Quote:
BOb |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 4,293
Karma: 529619
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
|
Quote:
Why people keep trying to compare apples with oranges is beyond me, other than just the latest craze of comparing Apple's shiny new gadget with anything and everything they can think of. I guess such articles bring in lots of blog hits, maybe that's the only real reason. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 4,293
Karma: 529619
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
|
It's not being marketed as an e-reading device. It's being marketed as a multimedia tablet which also happens to include an eBook app. It's definitely not it's primary function, and was never meant to be. It would be like saying that your PC is marketed as an MP3 player, just because it comes with Windows Media Player installed. Does that mean your PC is in competition with an iPod?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 221
Karma: 801624
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: US Pacific Northwest
Device: LePan II, Kobo Aura
|
From Apples own website under their short list of "iPad at a glance":
http://store.apple.com/us/browse/hom...US-KWG-iPad-US they are hyping it as "A new way to read and buy books" and claim that it's "More than a great ebook reader, it’s also an amazing place to browse and shop for books." That sure sounds like marketing talk to me. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,300
Karma: 1121709
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Amazon Kindle 1
|
The iPad is being marketed with e-reading being one of its main features.
So I see no issues with discussing how well it does at that task. Most everyone I know that has or is interested in an iPad is interested in the e-book function. Maybe not as their main reason--as like me none of them are bookworms--but people are aware of the function. They show the iBook app a few times in the TV commercial etc. So I see no problems about articles discussing that feature and how it compares to the other options for reading e-books. I do think such articles should be fair and point out the advantages the device has in terms of all the other functions it can do. Because let's face it, the vast majority of people don't read enough to have much interest in shelling out $200+ for a dedicated e-reader--so for the mainstream being multifunction is a big selling point. I want a tablet, and I will read on it. But I'll no doubt spend more time surfing the net, watching videos, playing games etc. based on my experience messing around with my girlfriend's ipad. In a same token, there's no need to be so harsh on eyestrain etc. as the average joe isn't reading for hours a day like the people on this site. I seldom read more than an hour or so in a give stretch so I can read on pretty much anything. Articles should mention that eyestrain is really only a concern for most if they're doing long term reading etc. But that's just a problem with any reviews/articles etc. as they're all just one person's biased personal opinion, so people shouldn't make to much of them nor waste time arguing over them. In the end of the day the only thing that matters on gadgets is your opinion on them and whether they fit your needs or not. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cool-er other e-ink devices | sassanik | Feedback | 11 | 01-06-2010 10:10 PM |
My personal opinions on several E-ink devices | slayda | Which one should I buy? | 5 | 08-13-2009 05:54 AM |
Magzines on E-Ink Devices | bbusybookworm | Workshop | 0 | 04-28-2008 11:07 AM |
Question about E-ink devices | netriones | Which one should I buy? | 6 | 12-15-2006 05:05 AM |
E Ink: The market and devices retrospective | Stuart Young | Deals and Resources (No Self-Promotion or Affiliate Links) | 0 | 09-17-2006 02:39 PM |