Just spotted: Remarkable Paper Pro Move

[DrChiper]

For details see here. Seems pricey, though.

[rantanplan]

That is such a weird aspect ratio.

[Cactus Chef]

Originally Posted by rantanplan

That is such a weird aspect ratio.

It fits my intended use-case of wanting to read everything like it's printed on a church pamphlet.

[Quoth]

Originally Posted by DrChiper

For details see here. Seems pricey, though.

They have always been overpriced. Like all reMarkable web pages it's high on hype and short of specs. The reMarkable 1 & 2 are ghastly to connect with (Not even MTP, networking only!).

They seem to want to sell a subscription with it.

It's about x2 overpriced. Also how long will they stay in business?

Edit:
Using E Ink Gallery 3. I'm sceptical about how responsive it is.
https://remarkable.com/products/rema...tails/features

[tomsem]

Originally Posted by Quoth

It's about x2 overpriced. Also how long will they stay in business?

Some months ago they were hiring product managers for Salesforce and IIRC SAP integration. Enterprise customers are not that sensitive to unit price, or paying for services especially if they can get features they want implemented.

They can continue as long as their shareholders think there's some chance they land a big contract. Individual users aren't gonna be enough.

That is such a weird aspect ratio.

Consistent with many Android phones and tablets, which this sorta is.

[DNSB]

Pretty much the same 16:9 screen aspect ratio and diagonal as an old Android tablet I used to own. I would have preferred a 300ppi display instead of a 264ppi display but then a lot of the lower end Android tablets have gone from 1920x1080/1200 to 1280x720/800 as their "HD" screens.

One company I do some work with is looking at Remarkable for their encryption.

[Aleron Ives]

Voja has posted a first impressions video if you want to see the Move in action:



Aside from a the size, aspect ratio, and a slightly whiter screen, it's basically the same as the Paper Pro. The refreshes are slow and blinky, as is expected from a Gallery 3 panel, but the colour reproduction is also better than Kaleido 3.

[Quoth]

Originally Posted by Aleron Ives

…

The refreshes are slow and blinky, as is expected from a Gallery 3 panel, but the colour reproduction is also better than Kaleido 3.

Kaleido: About 4000 variations, inc saturations and brightnesses. R G B G partial matrix so dark and pastel. About 10x to 100x slower than LCD/OLED.
Gallery: About 32000 variations, inc saturations and brightnesses. C Y M subtractive so brighter and no artefacts. About x10 slower than Kaleido.

Hardly the "natural" colour claimed. You need at least 4 M variations for that. Regular CRTs, OLED, LCD etc are over 16 M.

[MSWallack]

I understand some of the naysaying about ReMarkable devices, but I've had several (starting with a ReMarkable 1, moved to a ReMarkable 2, and now using a ReMarkable Pro). Yes, they're expensive. So are a lot of products. But I've got to say that I've absolutely loved all of my ReMarkable devices as have my coworkers who've also ordered one. Do I plan to buy this new device? No, probably not, because I don't really have the use case for it. And are there things that I'd want to improve on my current device? Of course, but that could be said for every piece of electronics I've ever owned.

[Quoth]

I still have the reMarkable 1, which has some advantages over the cost-reduced hardly different reMarkable 2. The only worse large ereader I have is the Kindle DXG. The Elipsa was hugely better.