Silliness Tomorrow's Question

radioflyertoo · 09-04-2008, 06:59 AM

Since there was a fog* while riding to work I was able to get tomorrows question today.

Is it the whichness of why or the whatness of when that causes illogical inconsistencies in the mien of our semirigid existence in this corporeal plain?

*Fog as you all know is a substitute for a formal interdimensional and time travel machines used by many. However fog is a spotty Scotty in how and where yugo so you must bring quantum string.

Bob

Tomorrow being a figment of our dreams this question does not become invalid - silly maybe.

Steven Lyle Jordan · 09-04-2008, 09:19 AM

Neither. It is the whereness of who.

VillageReader · 09-04-2008, 10:13 AM

Nope. The howness of we.

pshrynk · 09-04-2008, 11:08 AM

I was thinking it was the unutterableness of the silly.

LazyScot · 09-04-2008, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by radioflyertoo

Is it the whichness of why or the whatness of when that causes illogical inconsistencies in the mien of our semirigid existence in this corporeal plain?

Either the absence of Zany Carters after breakfast.

Patricia · 09-04-2008, 11:24 AM

There. And I thought this was a question about the quiddity or haecceity of things (except phrased in Engish, rather than scholastic Latin.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quiddity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haecceity

LazyScot · 09-04-2008, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patricia

There. And I thought this was a question about the quiddity or haecceity of things (except phrased in Engish, rather than scholastic Latin.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quiddity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haecceity

One feels that perhaps this would there be a good subject of a symposium.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/symposium

zelda_pinwheel · 09-04-2008, 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LazyScot

One feels that perhaps this would there be a good subject of a symposium.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/symposium

wikipedia :

Quote:

Symposium originally referred to a drinking party (the Greek verb sympotein means "to drink together")

that explains a lot...

DixieGal · 09-04-2008, 12:04 PM

It's the hearing of the who when Horton heard the whom.

Steven Lyle Jordan · 09-04-2008, 12:59 PM

Does that make "whom" a plural of "who"s? And is the lack of capitalization of the proper name because they are such small beings?

Boy, it sure is getting foggy* in here... last time I got caught in a weird fog, I spent the weekend being chased by giant spiders in my basement...

RickyMaveety · 09-04-2008, 01:05 PM

Too .... early .... brain .... seizing .... up. Need .... pain .... pills .... and ..... chocolate!!

(where the hell is the smiley showing me dragging myself across the floor in the general direction of the candy bowl??)

pshrynk · 09-04-2008, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RickyMaveety

Too .... early .... brain .... seizing .... up. Need .... pain .... pills .... and ..... chocolate!!

(where the hell is the smiley showing me dragging myself across the floor in the general direction of the candy bowl??)

You have to make your own until the smiley factory can get caught up on the backorders. Like this -- :medraggingmyassacrossthefloortothecandybowl:

glad to be of help.

DixieGal · 09-04-2008, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Jordan

Does that make "whom" a plural of "who"s? And is the lack of capitalization of the proper name because they are such small beings?

Boy, it sure is getting foggy* in here... last time I got caught in a weird fog, I spent the weekend being chased by giant spiders in my basement...

I honestly don't know what you are talking about here. Since when are whose the pleural of anything, and where are these small beings of whom you speak? However, I did mistype horton, please disregard the upper case H. As in, "Whos' hortons are these spilled all over the table?" or "The delivery of hortons will be delayed due to problems with the maisies."

Steven Lyle Jordan · 09-04-2008, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DixieGal

I honestly don't know what you are talking about here. Since when are whose the pleural of anything, and where are these small beings of whom you speak?

Why... here's one, right next to me! uh...

Uh-oh... that fog* is shrinking me a lot faster than I thought...

DixieGal · 09-04-2008, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Jordan

Why... here's one, right next to me! uh...

Uh-oh... that fog* is shrinking me a lot faster than I thought...

Pshrinking? Oh I see, you were pshrunken by the fog, so the spiders only seemed to be giants. Makes sense now.

09-04-2008, 06:59 AM	#1
radioflyertoo Hog Rider Posts: 266 Karma: 1581 Join Date: May 2008 Location: eastern PA. Device: HTC 7501	Tomorrow's Question Since there was a fog* while riding to work I was able to get tomorrows question today. Is it the whichness of why or the whatness of when that causes illogical inconsistencies in the mien of our semirigid existence in this corporeal plain? *Fog as you all know is a substitute for a formal interdimensional and time travel machines used by many. However fog is a spotty Scotty in how and where yugo so you must bring quantum string. Bob Tomorrow being a figment of our dreams this question does not become invalid - silly maybe.

09-04-2008, 12:59 PM	#10
Steven Lyle Jordan Grand Sorcerer Posts: 8,478 Karma: 5171130 Join Date: Jan 2006 Device: none	Does that make "whom" a plural of "who"s? And is the lack of capitalization of the proper name because they are such small beings? Boy, it sure is getting foggy* in here... last time I got caught in a weird fog, I spent the weekend being chased by giant spiders in my basement... Last edited by Steven Lyle Jordan; 09-04-2008 at 01:02 PM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Classic Few Nook Question and Question on Nook 3G vs WiFi	blackonblack	Barnes & Noble NOOK	4	07-02-2010 02:07 AM
Looking for another reader question and PRS-600 question	lilpretender	Which one should I buy?	9	10-24-2009 04:02 AM
Another BD question	Bierius	Sony Reader	8	05-17-2007 08:57 AM

09-04-2008, 09:19 AM	#2
Steven Lyle Jordan Grand Sorcerer Posts: 8,478 Karma: 5171130 Join Date: Jan 2006 Device: none	Neither. It is the whereness of who.

09-04-2008, 10:13 AM	#3
VillageReader Evangelist Posts: 430 Karma: 2718 Join Date: May 2006 Device: Iliad	Nope. The howness of we.

09-04-2008, 11:08 AM	#4
pshrynk Beepbeep n beebeep, yeah! Posts: 11,726 Karma: 8255450 Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: La Crosse, Wisconsin, aka America's IceBox Device: iThingie, KmkII, I miss Zelda!	I was thinking it was the unutterableness of the silly.

09-04-2008, 11:24 AM	#6
Patricia Reader Posts: 11,504 Karma: 8720163 Join Date: May 2007 Location: South Wales, UK Device: Sony PRS-500, PRS-505, Asus EEEpc 4G	There. And I thought this was a question about the quiddity or haecceity of things (except phrased in Engish, rather than scholastic Latin.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quiddity http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haecceity

09-04-2008, 12:04 PM	#9
DixieGal Hi There! Posts: 7,473 Karma: 2930523 Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Ft Lauderdale Device: iPad	It's the hearing of the who when Horton heard the whom.

09-04-2008, 01:05 PM	#11
RickyMaveety Holy S**T!!! Posts: 5,213 Karma: 108401 Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: San Diego, California!! Device: Kindle and iPad	Too .... early .... brain .... seizing .... up. Need .... pain .... pills .... and ..... chocolate!! (where the hell is the smiley showing me dragging myself across the floor in the general direction of the candy bowl??)

Advert

Advert