![]() |
#1 |
Gregg Bell
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,266
Karma: 3917598
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Itasca, Illinois
Device: Kindle Touch 7, Sony PRS300, Fire HD8 Tablet
|
Which font works best in title?
It's a romance novel. Thanks!
#1 ![]() #2 ![]() #3 ![]() #4 ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,230
Karma: 7145404
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southern California
Device: Kindle Voyage & iPhone 7+
|
I like #4 best. I think it has to do with legibility (less ornate or stylized) and larger size. The kerning between T and e in Test needs adjustment.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Wizzard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 11,517
Karma: 33048258
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Roundworld
Device: Kindle 2 International, Sony PRS-T1, BlackBerry PlayBook, Acer Iconia
|
#1 and #4 seem to be the best of the lot. #2 seems too cartoony, and #3 still looks like it could be read as Jest.
#4 seems to be the clearest, but I agree with the comment upthread that the space between the T and e needs to be fixed, and I'm not sure the way the The overlaps the T is working. Also, I like the style of the T from #1 more than that of #4, where it seems a little plain to go with the rest of the cursive style, but the "est" of #4 more than that of #1, which is not as clearly legible. Maybe try combining the two? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,066
Karma: 12500000
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Okanagan
Device: Sony PRS-650, Kobo Clara
|
#4. 2nd - #1.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guru
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 733
Karma: 5797160
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Istanbul
Device: Kobo Libra
|
First one is the best but I think Bodoni in your name is more of a problem. High contrast of Bodoni, when paired with low contrast between the color of the glyphs and color of the pier, loses legibility. Legibility is very important in a cover.
You should use something like ITC Garamond (which is a display typeface anyway). It would go better with title too. |
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#6 |
Gregg Bell
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,266
Karma: 3917598
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Itasca, Illinois
Device: Kindle Touch 7, Sony PRS300, Fire HD8 Tablet
|
Thanks everyone for the feedback!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Groupie
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 192
Karma: 1237440
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Device: Kobo Glo, Arc7HD/10HD, smartphones
|
the original #3 was best (i actually prefer the longer T which doesn't look like a J at all to me)
from these and only these, i'd begrudgingly say #1 and then kind of #3. the T of #2 and #4 is too tall and skinny. years ago i had a gf whose name started with T and for some reason i developed a T when writing her name that i really liked. i tried using it on your title, but it doesn't work since the second letter doesn't jive with it (her name was Thuy, so the shape of the h helped it work) try just grabbing a marker and paper, and hand-writing the title in whatever script flows from your hand. doesn't have to be a pre-defined one, just has to work for this one title this one time. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,613
Karma: 6718541
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Paradise (Key West, FL)
Device: Current:Surface Go & Kindle 3 - Retired: DellV8p, Clie UX50, ...
|
I have a slight preference for #1. The other three can all be improved by kerning the "Te" pair to reduce the space between the glyphs. Any decent app will have a control that will allow you to adjust the spacing when you place the cursor between a pair of characters. It's on the Character panel in Photoshop and on similar panels or toolbars in Illustrator, Corel DRAW, and the like.
I also agree somewhat with GERGE that the serifs on the font used for the white text are too thin for this use. I have a general dislike for razor thin serifs in general, though. I like a good Garamond, but rather dislike the ITC Garamond, and Garamonds are a bit different in appearance compared to the font you've used in these samples. You might look for a slab serif font that is more similar to the font you've used but that has thicker serifs. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Fanatic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 563
Karma: 403106
Join Date: Aug 2014
Device: PRS-T1
|
#1 then #4 to me.
Reason - because #1 is the most disorganized (chaotic) script, and probably will fit the content (I mean it's not driving licence test, right?). Then comes #4. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Grand Sorceress
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 456
Karma: 12931465
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Florida
Device: Kindle
|
Hello, my vote goes for #4; it looks pretty neat especially for a Romance Genre. I personally find it appealing, although I do agree with other users in their opinion that #1's style is also good.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Gregg Bell
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,266
Karma: 3917598
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Itasca, Illinois
Device: Kindle Touch 7, Sony PRS300, Fire HD8 Tablet
|
Thanks all. Really appreciate the feedback!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
![]() Posts: 18
Karma: 10
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Florida
Device: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8" (2017)
|
Having been a calligrapher, I'd pick 3, it's definitely a "romance" fomt.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Zealot
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 147
Karma: 2747136
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Britain
Device: Kobo Aura One
|
I like 1 & 4. Number 3 still runs the risk of being read 'the Jest'.
This is really taking me back. Back in the 1970s I was considering training as a graphic designer, and I did a 'taster' course. Part of it was 'hot lead': actually setting a page with the old moveable type-characters, the sort that Caxton and Gutenberg used. I really enjoyed it: I loved seeing how you could change the implication of a word by shifting the font you used. Now this must seem a genuinely medieval skill! But it's good to see that something of that care to detail is still relevant today. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Junior Member
![]() Posts: 3
Karma: 10
Join Date: Jan 2015
Device: Nook
|
I agree with a lot of other posters- 1 and 4 are the ones I prefer.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Gregg Bell
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,266
Karma: 3917598
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Itasca, Illinois
Device: Kindle Touch 7, Sony PRS300, Fire HD8 Tablet
|
Personally I liked #1 but I think captpete is right and #3 says romance. Going with that--and a slight variation so the capital T looks like a T and not a J. Thanks all very much for all your help.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Embedded font works in AZF but not MOBI | ozshots | Calibre | 9 | 09-25-2013 06:27 AM |
Font embed: works on computer, not on device | Elfwreck | Sigil | 8 | 02-07-2012 12:52 AM |
Classic Font and epub, what works on sony, now works on Nook too! | ctos | Barnes & Noble NOOK | 26 | 07-25-2011 09:24 AM |
Touch Font Change no longer works on Nook Simple? | localbuyer | Barnes & Noble NOOK | 13 | 07-09-2011 11:29 AM |
PRS-300 Font Embedding Works on the 300 | luqmaninbmore | Sony Reader | 1 | 09-05-2009 08:45 AM |