![]() |
#1 |
Geographically Restricted
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,629
Karma: 14933353
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
Device: Sony PRS-T3, Kindle Voyage, iPad Air2, Nexus7v2
|
Australian Government gives PDF thumbs down
A short but interesting article regarding a report originating out of the Australian Federal government's IT department.
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/240304...df-format.aspx I wonder what alternatives to PDF documents they would consider? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 256
Karma: 112042
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maryland, USA
Device: Sony PRS-650
|
Maybe they are pushing for .epub!
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 351
Karma: 70000
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Australia
Device: ADE, iPad
|
I don't see what alternative could be...heaven forbid they move back to .doc files...*gulp*
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Geographically Restricted
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,629
Karma: 14933353
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
Device: Sony PRS-T3, Kindle Voyage, iPad Air2, Nexus7v2
|
Certainly a format that allows easy read aloud options.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guru
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 973
Karma: 4269175
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Europe
Device: Pocketbook Basic 613
|
If they are worried about accessibility I don't think .doc is very likely. Perhaps some XML based format, (X)HTHML even.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#6 |
Guru
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 615
Karma: 2362786
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: PocketBook Verse Pro Colour
|
When it comes to accessibility, PDF (as a format) is not worse than many other formats. The issue is how you create your PDF. E.g. one small tick in a checkbox will make your PDF reflowable, but apparently most creators of PDFs leave that checkbox blank.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Information Acquirer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 436
Karma: 4265156
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Latvia, Rigas Rajons
Device: Kindle 3 International, Pocketbook Color
|
And the fun thing about the whole story is that the main report can be downloaded as:
PDF_study.pdf And the supplementary report as: PDF_study_Supplement.pdf ![]() Clicky |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Enquiring Mind
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 562
Karma: 42350
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London, UK
Device: Kindle 3 (WiFi)
|
Ah, but it's also available as a series of web pages (which I'd assume/hope have been created in compliance with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines and therefore will be accessible to assistive technologies).
If you follow the links back, you'll see that this report stems from the Australian Government's "Web Accessibility National Transition Strategy" and, from my experience working in web accessibility here in the UK, most likely results from the tendency of local and national government departments to produce documents in PDF format and then put them on their website, without making the same content available in any other format (not even web pages). The underlying problem is that, more often than not, those producing various documents within a local authority or a government department are far removed from any awareness of web/document accessibility issues, but the web team don't have the time/staff resources to do all the work of making such documents accessible or converting them into alternative formats. So stuff ends up going up on the web as a PDF and nothing else. The problem that these web teams face is getting sufficient "buy in" from senior management to ensure appropriate training for staff in other departments, and sufficient resources to enable the web team to ensure that everything that goes up on the website is optimised for accessibility, either by creating accessible documents in the first place, or being able to create alternative formats to sit alongside the original documents. I can foresee similar issues for large publishers, as ebooks become more and more "mainstream", and the requirement that the formats used for ebooks should be accessible to assistive technologies grows. This is just a guess on my part, but I suspect that, if anything is likely to push Amazon towards the EPUB format, it'll be growing pressure towards accessibility, and right now, EPUB is more likely to offer that than MOBI. - Donna |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Enquiring Mind
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 562
Karma: 42350
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London, UK
Device: Kindle 3 (WiFi)
|
Because MS Office is so widely used, particularly in business, many assistive technologies are actually very adept at working with .doc files (they have to be, if they hope to have any chance of being purchased for use in the workplace). Then, when you factor in the way in which Word and PDF documents are most commonly created, you do end up with a situation where a Word doc is more likely to be accessible to those using some form of assistive technology than a PDF document.
- Donna |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Connoisseur
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 54
Karma: 499216
Join Date: Sep 2010
Device: none
|
Finally somebody sees the light.
The fact that there are still software companies who've build almost a monopoly (>90% market share) by the sheer force of file format obsfucation is just silly. This is the 2010s for chrissakes. XML variants all the way. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 351
Karma: 70000
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Australia
Device: ADE, iPad
|
Converting all the existing PDFs across to XML, will be a hellish job, the shear amount of PDF alone which a country government would generate would be huge.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Enquiring Mind
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 562
Karma: 42350
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London, UK
Device: Kindle 3 (WiFi)
|
The way to tackle it would be to identify the most accessed documents, and convert those (to whatever alternative format(s) are selected), then convert older/less frequently accessed documents on an ad hoc basis, as people request them. As each document is converted, the accessible version(s) can then be added to the website.
The really difficult thing, and in some respects the most important aspect that needs to be addressed, is changing the "grass roots" processes used within all the various departments and offices in a local authority or government department to create new documents. Unless that's changed, the problem of inaccessible documents being created will continue. - Donna |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 351
Karma: 70000
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Australia
Device: ADE, iPad
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Sci-Fi Author
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,158
Karma: 14743509
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Michigan
Device: PC (Calibre)
|
PDF is an international standard, so they'll be hard pressed to move away from it since everyone else will demand it. Personally, I think that whoever is making this recommendation is being paid (aka bribed) by a major software company (I can give you three guess who, but you'll probably get it on the first try) to get away from open source standards and towards someone's closed, vendor locked, proprietary standard so that they can rake in the bucks.
It happens a LOT. In fact, it's so common that it's scary. It happened to us at one company I worked at no less than seven times, and every single time it happened, we ended up forking out a big chunk of change for an otherwise inferior system. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 5,187
Karma: 25133758
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area, California, USA
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3 (Past: Kobo Mini, PEZ, PRS-505, Clié)
|
Quote:
Saying "PDFs are/could be reflowable" is a lot like saying "text on paper is readable under normal lighting conditions." It depends on how it was made, and what it was made from. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
australian, government, pdf |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
KOBO pdf thumbs-down | JCSullivan | Kobo Reader | 61 | 10-05-2010 08:41 PM |
US Government stumbles over PDF document | Colin Dunstan | Lounge | 7 | 01-12-2010 02:37 AM |
Australian Skeptics Magazine - PDF | m-reader | Reading Recommendations | 10 | 11-27-2009 12:31 PM |
Mossberg gives K2 thumbs up | Alexander Turcic | Amazon Kindle | 9 | 02-27-2009 07:18 PM |