|
|
#16 | |
|
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 19,832
Karma: 11844413
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tampa, FL USA
Device: Kindle Touch
|
Quote:
BOb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 4,293
Karma: 529619
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
|
Quote:
The way iRex has referred to "generations" in the past has been: 6" screen + alpha controller (most devices, including the kindle) = Gen 1 8.1" screen + delta controller (iLiad) = Gen 2 I'm assuming that they're using the same definition they have previously, and that now they're adding: 10.2" screen + improved delta controller (DR1000) = Gen 3 |
|
|
|
|
| Advert | |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Resident Curmudgeon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 82,176
Karma: 150871427
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
|
I consider the Sony Librie, the 500, and the iLiad to be gen 1. The 505, Kindle, Gen3, V3 (and derivatives) to be gen 2 and the DR to be gen 3. The Plastic Logic could very well be gen 4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 4,293
Karma: 529619
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 19,832
Karma: 11844413
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tampa, FL USA
Device: Kindle Touch
|
Quote:
I consider all the current eInk devices to be Gen 1 of eInk. They are probably Gen 2 of digital readers in general with LCD devices being Gen 1. BOb |
|
|
|
|
| Advert | |
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||
|
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 4,293
Karma: 529619
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
|
Quote:
Yes, it is all marketing speak. You can define "generation" with regards to these devices anyway you want. JWolf's definition is just as valid as iRex's. I was just trying to point out what iRex meant in the article, and that they were not talking about a new generation of eInk, which some people seemed to have thought. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Displaying ink too light in iRex device | jack0909 | iRex | 1 | 10-19-2009 12:48 PM |
| Displaying ink too light in iRex DR 1000 | jack0909 | iRex | 1 | 10-19-2009 12:43 PM |
| At Last: *Front-Lit* E-Ink, Flexible E-Ink and ... E-Ink Watches! | NatCh | News | 1 | 10-27-2007 11:50 AM |
| E Ink reveals e-paper with video-switching speeds / iRex wins award | Alexander Turcic | News | 12 | 06-02-2007 08:40 PM |
| iRex next-gen e-book reader based on e Ink | Alexander Turcic | iRex | 20 | 12-19-2005 06:06 PM |