Sigil-0.9.10 Released - Page 4

exaltedwombat · 08-01-2018, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Notjohn

It is certainly true that it would be nice to have Code View keep level with Preview, but I think it's even nicer that as I page down through Code View, the Preview panel now moves along with it -- I needn't click on a line in Code View! (It also happens when I page UP.)

I may be wrong, but I don't think previous version of Sigil did that without being asked.

(Windows 7 Pro, 32-bit.)

Yes, that would be nice too. Perhaps we can have them both....?

CalibUser · 08-02-2018, 11:16 AM

Thanks for another update - Sigil goes from strength to strength

odamizu · 08-02-2018, 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DiapDealer

I'm glad the panic is over.

For others...

We will restore the feature. But there is no urgency. It's quite trivial to downgrade to Sigil 0.9.9 in the meantime. Just uninstall Sigil and install the older version to downgrade. It's that simple.

But ... but ... then there would be no custom icons!

Just kidding

Thanks again for all your work!

GrannyGrump · 08-03-2018, 03:35 AM

Or try keeping various PORTABLE versions around, and use whichever one suits the task at hand.

I know the portable version from PortableApps.com is not officially sanctioned by Kevin, DiapD, et al, but I have been doing this for a long time with no problems yet.

Have I just been lucky?

DiapDealer · 08-03-2018, 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrannyGrump

I know the portable version from PortableApps.com is not officially sanctioned by Kevin, DiapD, et al, but I have been doing this for a long time with no problems yet.

Have I just been lucky?

Some of the changes I've made to Sigil are so PortableApps can do what they do more easily/efficiently. I have no beef with them, nor do I think their versions of Sigil are particularly risky. It's just that when an issue does arise, I don't want to waste a lot of time trouble-shooting and investigating it BEFORE finding out it's not the official version of Sigil. If it can't be reproduced with the official release, I ain't interested in the bug.

GrannyGrump · 08-03-2018, 06:36 AM

Fair enough. That's why, when I have had the rare buggy behavior, I have always made sure I can reproduce it in the installed version.

DiapDealer · 08-03-2018, 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrannyGrump

Fair enough. That's why, when I have had the rare buggy behavior, I have always made sure I can reproduce it in the installed version.

Thanks!

st_albert · 08-03-2018, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by exaltedwombat

Interesting that different people use Sigil in different ways. It's just me who found that change a showstopper?

Well, the question is becoming moot, what with the plans for accommodating both in one way or another, but since you asked, for me, it was a reason to not upgrade in the first place. I use the preview in lieu of book view, and do a lot of switching back and forth by clicking on a line in one or the other. OTOH I hardly ever need to open hyperlinks that way.

I'll be content to wait and see what develops.

Albert

KevinH · 08-03-2018, 01:04 PM

A hopeful "fix" for this already exists in master on github. It just needs testing. So if you build from source on MacOSX, Linux, or Windows, we would appreciate hearing back if the "fix" works and allows both syncing from Preview to CodeView by clicking and links in Preview to work.

BeckyEbook · 08-03-2018, 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevinH

A hopeful "fix" for this already exists in master on github. It just needs testing. So if you build from source on MacOSX, Linux, or Windows, we would appreciate hearing back if the "fix" works and allows both syncing from Preview to CodeView by clicking and links in Preview to work.

Build on Windows 10.
I confirm that both works (syncing and links are clickable in Preview; it works great for TOC, footnotes and other links).

I did not notice anything alarming.

KevinH · 08-03-2018, 08:08 PM

Thank you!

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeckyEbook

Build on Windows 10.
I confirm that both works (syncing and links are clickable in Preview; it works great for TOC, footnotes and other links).

I did not notice anything alarming.

Gregg Bell · 08-03-2018, 08:38 PM

I just went to log in to Sigil and got the news that 9.10 is out. I currently have 9.8. Is 9.10 for beta testers only? (Although not a total washout, I'm decidedly non-techie.) Maybe I should just upgrade to 9.9? And last thing would be how to get an upgrade for Xubuntu 16.04LTS on a 64 bit computer? Thanks.

Turtle91 · 08-04-2018, 09:49 AM

9.10 is the most current released version - not beta.

Notjohn · 08-04-2018, 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gregg Bell

I just went to log in to Sigil and got the news that 9.10 is out. I currently have 9.8. Is 9.10 for beta testers only? (Although not a total washout, I'm decidedly non-techie.) Maybe I should just upgrade to 9.9? And last thing would be how to get an upgrade for Xubuntu 16.04LTS on a 64 bit computer? Thanks.

It's a fine and robust release, with the welcome addition of clickable urls in the Preview panel. (For that advance, you do lose the ability to sync Code View by clicking on a word in Preview panel, but I gather that's only a temporary loss.)

Can't help you with Xubuntu.

I don't like the release number. To me, 9.10 = 9.1 and is therefore streets behind 9.9.

Turtle91 · 08-04-2018, 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Notjohn

...
I don't like the release number. To me, 9.10 = 9.1 and is therefore streets behind 9.9.

lolz...you must be a mathematician type rather than a software type. The next release will likely be .9.11, then .9.12 which makes perfect sense from a versioning notation perspective.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Sigil-0.8.900 released for testing - Wait for Sigil-0.8.901	KevinH	Sigil	106	10-04-2015 10:41 AM
Sigil 0.8.5 Released	user_none	Sigil	12	03-30-2015 11:28 AM
Sigil 0.7.2 Released	user_none	Sigil	40	06-24-2013 11:35 PM
Sigil 0.7.0 Released	user_none	Sigil	75	03-03-2013 12:41 PM

08-02-2018, 11:16 AM	#47
CalibUser Addict Posts: 202 Karma: 62362 Join Date: Jul 2015 Device: Sony	Thanks for another update - Sigil goes from strength to strength

08-03-2018, 03:35 AM	#49
GrannyGrump Obsessively Dedicated... Posts: 3,213 Karma: 34984928 Join Date: May 2011 Location: JAPAN (US expatriate) Device: Sony PRS-T2, ADE on PC	Or try keeping various PORTABLE versions around, and use whichever one suits the task at hand. I know the portable version from PortableApps.com is not officially sanctioned by Kevin, DiapD, et al, but I have been doing this for a long time with no problems yet. Have I just been lucky?

08-03-2018, 06:36 AM	#51
GrannyGrump Obsessively Dedicated... Posts: 3,213 Karma: 34984928 Join Date: May 2011 Location: JAPAN (US expatriate) Device: Sony PRS-T2, ADE on PC	Fair enough. That's why, when I have had the rare buggy behavior, I have always made sure I can reproduce it in the installed version.

08-03-2018, 01:04 PM	#54
KevinH Sigil Developer Posts: 8,717 Karma: 5703586 Join Date: Nov 2009 Device: many	A hopeful "fix" for this already exists in master on github. It just needs testing. So if you build from source on MacOSX, Linux, or Windows, we would appreciate hearing back if the "fix" works and allows both syncing from Preview to CodeView by clicking and links in Preview to work.

08-03-2018, 08:38 PM	#57
Gregg Bell Gregg Bell Posts: 2,266 Karma: 3917598 Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Itasca, Illinois Device: Kindle Touch 7, Sony PRS300, Fire HD8 Tablet	I just went to log in to Sigil and got the news that 9.10 is out. I currently have 9.8. Is 9.10 for beta testers only? (Although not a total washout, I'm decidedly non-techie.) Maybe I should just upgrade to 9.9? And last thing would be how to get an upgrade for Xubuntu 16.04LTS on a 64 bit computer? Thanks.

08-04-2018, 09:49 AM	#58
Turtle91 A Hairy Wizard Posts: 3,345 Karma: 20171571 Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Charleston, SC today Device: iPhone 15/11/X/6/iPad 1,2,Air & Air Pro/Surface Pro/Kindle PW & Fire	9.10 is the most current released version - not beta.