![]() |
#16 |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 11,310
Karma: 43993832
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monroe Wisconsin
Device: K3, Kindle Paperwhite, Calibre, and Mobipocket for Pc (netbook)
|
I had an example of this just the evening before yesterday. I wanted to get a picture printed at Wal-Mart but I couldn't find any of my USB drives. Then I noticed that it is possible to upload a pic to the store online and get it printed at your local store that way. Great I thought. Well I uploaded the pic, picked the size and # of copies I wanted and placed my order. I got a receipt that said it would be ready at 10 am yesterday (Oct. 18th) at my store. I had to get some meds refilled and figured I could get the pics at the same time. Wrong! They had no record of the purchase at the store much less the pics even though I got there around 11 am. The sales lady checked online and it will probably be several weeks before I get the pics. So what good does it do to give me a receipt that says they will be ready by 10 am on Oct 18th? Not a big thing at only .40 with tax but come on if you promise a buyer something with a specific date and time especially something so minor (that required no shipping of physical goods) shouldn't you be held to keep your promise?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,898
Karma: 9851695
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Noo Yawk
Device: Samsung Galaxy and Windows devices. RIP: Palm & Nook devices.
|
I've read the other posts in this thread, concur with many responses, e.g., those citing the purpose of consumer law and escrow services, and am sorry to read about crich70's unsatisfactory Wal-Mart experience. I am equally displeased with many moves B&N has made regarding NOOK Store products. Nonetheless, the post that moved me to enter this conversation is:
Quote:
Regarding the latter: Eek! ![]() I acknowledge and have no qualms about the fact that modern-day USA commercial establishments can legally decline to serve people who have, for legitimate reasons, been barred (e.g., for stealing, behaving inappropriately, making excessive returns), cut off (e.g., for inebriation or having already bought a maximum amount of some limited-quantity item), or do not meet government-approved, published guidelines that apply equally to everyone (e.g., minimum age to buy tobacco or alcohol, dress code to enter certain retail establishments or educational institutions, or height requirement for amusement park rides). Nonetheless, reading that line makes me cringe and shudder, in remembrance of America's ugly, not-so-distant past, when hateful signs bearing such warnings as, "No Blacks Allowed/No Chinese Allowed/No Jews Allowed", were commonplace, allowable by law, reflective of illegitimate reasons for not serving prospective customers, and led to a culture wherein (for some people) "never leave home without it" applied not to an American Express card but to publications such as The Negro Travelers' Green Book. Last edited by Froide; 10-19-2016 at 03:10 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 28,591
Karma: 204624552
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
Quote:
I'm not "obligating" authorities to come to my rescue simply because I think I should be able to buy things willy-nilly with no negative repercussions for doing so. When I take responsibilty for my own purchasing satisfaction, then the rare occasions when I do get disappointed won't cause me to overinflate the significance of such a trifling inconvenience. I'll deal with it (with the options at my disposal) and move on. Last edited by DiapDealer; 10-19-2016 at 09:06 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Just a Yellow Smiley.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 19,161
Karma: 83862859
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Texas
Device: K4, K5, fire, kobo, galaxy
|
Quote:
I have seen one instance where I was GLAD the businesses have that right. Otherwise that blankity blank could have stayed. It was a child oriented restaurant. This guy came in wearing a t-shirt that said "I will f*** (full word) you until you find a boyfriend. It has nothing to do with semantics which a business cannot do. Discrimination is illegal. How would you phrase it? Over here, everything has to be specified. If the business did not have that right, then the children would be exposed to more perverts. There wouldn't be anything in the stores. And let's not forget health issues. If I forget my shoes or shirt, then a restaurant has the right to not serve me. Ok I think we are having a word problem. How do your businesses specify keeping out the riffraff? Rights over here are what people can do within the scope of the law. Example: I have the right to go topless or bottomless (except in certain bars) if I so choose. Businesses have the right to tell me I can't enter their place of business because of the lack of clothes. Of course if someone complained I could be arrested for public nudity if topless. If I am wearing a short skirt and no bloomers, no crime has been committed (unless in certain bars) . Spoiler:
Then it would be public lewdness. I'm think they can also refuse to allow someone in if they are totally stinky smelling. Now a business can't refuse me because I am whatever color or religion I may be, because they would be breaking the law. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 11,310
Karma: 43993832
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monroe Wisconsin
Device: K3, Kindle Paperwhite, Calibre, and Mobipocket for Pc (netbook)
|
Thank you Froide. I had an interesting post-script to the tale this morning. I woke up and checked my cell phone and there is a message from Wal-Mart telling me my pics are done. I'm glad it didn't take weeks but that means I have to make an extra trip out there to pick them up which means either $4.00 ($2.00 each way) or 2 cab ticket punches. Sigh. Sometimes you can't win.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,898
Karma: 9851695
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Noo Yawk
Device: Samsung Galaxy and Windows devices. RIP: Palm & Nook devices.
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,898
Karma: 9851695
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Noo Yawk
Device: Samsung Galaxy and Windows devices. RIP: Palm & Nook devices.
|
Quote:
This is mainly a demand-side issue regarding buyers' expectations of value and quality, and the buyers' perogative to take or leave the option to continue purchasing from a given supplier. [Related issues already mentioned in this thread, that also affect the sellers, include: lemon laws, consumer protection laws, and escrow services. Another, as yet unmentioned related issue is the wisdom of the 4C's of marketing (rather than the 4P's) for encouraging repeat business from, building goodwill with, and encouraging referrals by satisfied customers.]
My interpretation: This is a supply-side issue regarding a buyer's perogative. You and I completely agree that there are multiple illegitimate reasons for businesses to refuse to serve, refuse admittance to, or even expel certain customers, as well as multiple legitimate reasons for doing so. You've provided some extremely colorful, illustrative examples of the latter. LOL. And ![]() [Related issues already mentioned or alluded to in this thread (by you and me): U.S. Civil Rights/anti-discrimination laws.] Last edited by Froide; 10-19-2016 at 11:11 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Just a Yellow Smiley.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 19,161
Karma: 83862859
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Texas
Device: K4, K5, fire, kobo, galaxy
|
Quote:
Though I do have to say I find that one law amusing. Woman in a regular bar has to keep her Spoiler:
covered but she can show her
Spoiler:
to whoever she pleases. But in the other, she can't.
Spoiler:
She is getting drinks bought for her so what is the difference? (Never mind won't complete that thought. ) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
....
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,547
Karma: 18068960
Join Date: May 2012
Device: ....
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |||
Sharpest Tool On Shelf
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 661
Karma: 2587836
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Downunda
Device: Kindles, Kobo & Samsung Tablet
|
Quote:
Quote:
Fair is fair, you can't dispute what is good behavior and what is bad, if it is just a one way street. Quote:
The only thing inflated here, is the notion that others can do whatever they feel like, and that no matter what happens, if you are a victim, it is your own fault. I don't believe in such a robotic dog eat dog world ... Capitalism at its worst and human behavior at its worst. Capitalism only really works to the benefit of all, if we are all equal. Nature & Nurture, plus Lady Luck & Gremlins, make sure that we aren't. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | ||
Sharpest Tool On Shelf
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 661
Karma: 2587836
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Downunda
Device: Kindles, Kobo & Samsung Tablet
|
Quote:
So you are saying my topic has no merit on its own grounds? Not worthy, at the very least of a Philosophical discussion? You seem pretty narrow-minded I must say, and full of the wrong attitude. Anyway, just for the record, and Cinisajoy, who loves to push buttons and insinuate things, despite our truce, knows that I posted the following in another, related topic. Where I invited her and others therein, to participate in if they wished. It in no way needs to be part of this conversation though, else I would have linked back to it. And it is not like that conversation hasn't been front and center of late. You'd have to be not paying attention to miss it. Taken from here. Quote:
P.S.S. My belief, is the meat of that topic is best left there, as the meat of this topic is best left here. So while everyone is welcome to post in either place, unless warranted, I won't be responding to comments better left at those respective topics. Sorry, but I am too logical to do otherwise ... and it is hard enough keeping up with relevant things. So as they say - Choose your words wisely! ![]() Last edited by Timboli; 10-20-2016 at 01:00 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Just a Yellow Smiley.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 19,161
Karma: 83862859
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Texas
Device: K4, K5, fire, kobo, galaxy
|
I will just say that a little context would have been nice so the others would know why you think a company is obligated to you.
The product to which you are seeking was NOT available when you purchased the other 3. The company did not sign a contract with you that said they would sell you the 4th object when and if it became available. Only if you had both signed a contract specifying that you would get the fourth part would the company be obligated to sell it to you. Otherwise, you are on your own to get it. Did you get it in writing that you could buy the 4th piece to the puzzle? Though Timboli I must say you have me almost wanting to read this book. I might if it was reasonably priced. Folks, I think the lesson here is make sure what you want is completely available when you buy it, so you don't get stuck missing a piece for whatever reason. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 28,591
Karma: 204624552
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
Quote:
If you want to be "equals" with sellers, then do so. Only give your business to those who do right by you. Last edited by DiapDealer; 10-20-2016 at 02:47 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
....
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,547
Karma: 18068960
Join Date: May 2012
Device: ....
|
Quote:
- Customer insurance claim fraud - Customer warranty claim fraud - Customer shoplifting (including payment for some goods but not others hidden during a shop) - Customer indebtedness, including dishonoured instruments (cheques, cards, etc.) - Customer exaggerated sense of entitlement (e.g. not recognising the rights of the seller, demanding supply not in the original purchase agreement, lying to gain advantage). As others have said, it is in fact a two way street and most of us have no real problems with suppliers. So, as I said, I will leave you to your predetermined and unshakable "philosophy". |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 11,310
Karma: 43993832
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monroe Wisconsin
Device: K3, Kindle Paperwhite, Calibre, and Mobipocket for Pc (netbook)
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS - Trust & Treachery Anthology | DayAlMohamed | Writers' Corner | 1 | 10-13-2011 02:16 PM |
Full Economist.com 14 days free without obligations! | Colin Dunstan | Lounge | 0 | 09-16-2003 12:42 PM |