|04-21-2013, 02:14 PM||#1|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Device: Sony 350, K3-3G, K4SO, KPW
a question of copyright
Does anyone have any feelings about standard copyright statements v. creative commons statements?
|04-21-2013, 05:45 PM||#2|
Generally Awesome Person
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Device: Kobo Aura, Kindle Paperwhite 2
I think it depends on what you're trying to achieve. My personal stance is to go as free (as in liberties, or libre) as possible unless you have a reason or personal preference not to. For myself, for software that means the MIT license unless something mandates a more restrictive license. I haven't published text, but I think I would publish CC-BY-NC-SA and entertain other CC variations or other licenses depending on what I was hoping to achieve.
Just because you publish something under a CC license, doesn't mean you can't grant someone else a different license. For example, you could publish a book electronically under CC-BY-NC-SA and then grant written permission for a publisher to do what is necessary to publish, distribute, market, and sell the paper book.
|04-22-2013, 06:05 AM||#3|
Join Date: Jun 2011
I'd keep your copyright on standard lockdown for a book. "Rights Reserved" deal.
I'm a fan of transformative works, but there's no way I would put out a blanket statement about what I'd let people do with my work. It's more like a case-by-case permission for co-authors and remixers. Otherwise there's a big concern of some hate group or someone you're not fond of using your work in a way you really don't like.
Seriously, there's porn of everything, and unless it's really despicable or the author's yelling they've got my stamp of approval on it, I can turn a cheek and not go find it. But if someone's taking my writing and using it for something completely awful, I want to be able to just go to them and say "This ain't happening" without some fight about what I've permitted before.
From what I understand, a traditional copyright statement just says you hold all the rights. You're not stopped from letting people make non-profit transformative works from your stuff. But you can go up to someone that's abusing your material and tell them to knock it off.
|04-22-2013, 06:26 AM||#4|
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Voyage
If the author wants anyone wanting to do something with their work to get explicit permission, then the standard Alls Rights Reserved is appropriate.
For anything else, one of the many CC licences might be more appropriate.
Or perhaps even an unlicense.
|04-22-2013, 10:23 AM||#5|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Coastal Texas
Device: Asus TF300
I personally use CC licensing (usually no derivative works, with commercial use allowed given proper attribution) for works that I don't feel I'm likely to make any money on. The idea is that they're being done in the name of advertising.
The one I stick with is No Derivative Works. The general idea is that if someone wants to repost the story, they have to repost the complete thing.
|05-01-2013, 05:25 PM||#6|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Device: Iriver Story
I'm another user of CC, with the additions BY NC ND, which, if I remember correctly, means that I require citation of the source (BY), no commercial use (NC) and no derivative works (ND).
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Copyright Question||Lynx-lynx||General Discussions||15||05-28-2012 09:37 AM|
|copyright question||bobcdy||Workshop||8||07-24-2011 03:06 PM|
|copyright question||bobcdy||Workshop||7||05-30-2011 11:15 PM|
|A copyright question||ficbot||News||14||11-20-2009 08:48 AM|
|Question about copyright?||snookums||Deals, Freebies, and Resources (No Self-Promotion)||13||02-14-2008 03:45 PM|