![]() |
#46 | |
computer scientist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 108
Karma: 1587
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Gothenburg
Device: Gen 3
|
Done, I have mailed some of the researchers over at Physical Resource Theory.
This is the email. Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 | |
Fanatic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 584
Karma: 914
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: iliad
|
Quote:
eBook device have many advantages though, like quickly retrievable, easy carry, access anywhere, on complicated texts possibilities to have social tagging, quick access to additional information to a text, to dictionaries, and so on. I just don't consider environment as their primary sales point, nor is it IMHO a good idea to market it as such. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 | |
creator of calibre
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 45,199
Karma: 27110894
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mumbai, India
Device: Various
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Fanatic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 584
Karma: 914
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: iliad
|
As newspaper you are right, newspaper eat a lot of paper. So i consider eNewspaper as a real good thing. However a book holding content for a long time paper is really not that bad as some people view it to be, because it cuts this trees....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Fanatic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 584
Karma: 914
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: iliad
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
computer scientist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 108
Karma: 1587
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Gothenburg
Device: Gen 3
|
I am quite sure they will respond, until then I will stick in the "I know what believe and I do not see a point about arguing more about this" state of mind
![]() Last edited by Gianfranco; 08-20-2008 at 04:10 PM. Reason: What I mean to say: I am firm in my belief and won't budge, for now at least. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Fanatic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 584
Karma: 914
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: iliad
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Reader
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 11,504
Karma: 8720163
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Wales, UK
Device: Sony PRS-500, PRS-505, Asus EEEpc 4G
|
People interested in this topic might also be interested in Chuck Tremper's book, As the Oceans Rise, where he discusses this issue.
http://www.astheoceansrise.com/ I should point out that I was one of the people that he interviewed. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
computer scientist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 108
Karma: 1587
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Gothenburg
Device: Gen 3
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Fully Converged
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 18,171
Karma: 14021202
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Switzerland
Device: Too many to count here.
|
A couple of years ago the German government funded a study to analyze the environmental impact (direct and indirect) of e-books and concluded that e-books are not as environmentally safe as some may suspect. In fact, the study claimed that e-books can cause significant indirect ecological damage through the required use of energy (for instance, when you use your PC to browse e-book catalogs, to download and transfer e-books, or when you use wireless for transfer (e.g. EVDO)).
I attached the study. Most of it is in German (go figure). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,258
Karma: 3439432
Join Date: Feb 2008
Device: Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (300ppi), Samsung Galaxy Book 12
|
I work for a printer, and we've just been Forest Stewardship Council certified:
http://www.fsc.org/ so that's one datapoint in the renewable nature of books printed on paper. For ebook readers, while the metal is pretty much infinitely recyclable, plastics degrade in any recycling technique I'm aware of and so have a fixed life cycle, but as a counterpoint, glue &c. in printed works isn't recoverable. As regards ebooks working better to disseminate information, well, a paper book in a library achieves that quite well, so that nibbles away at that a bit. That said, Kovid's point of the convenience aspect is a good one, and if people didn't spend the money on an ebook reader they'd probably get a PDA or MP3 player or some other toy, so it's not an absolute cost. William |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
Groupie
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 186
Karma: 728
Join Date: Jul 2006
Device: Kindle PW
|
I agree with kovidgoyal.
We shouldn't claim that ebooks are environmentally friendly yet, so what? We're not going back to prehistory, it's not going to stop. We can take paper consumption as an indicator of the transition to a knowledge-based economy. Then take a look at the pdf, China and India are not there yet.. but they will be. Devices will converge, eventually you'll have two devices per person (or maybe even just one) for all your IT and media needs. At that point, infrastructure costs will be very stable. Primary energy generation will progressively go green, (but it will take much longer for transportation) And don't get me started on efficiency and productivity. What? I consume energy browsing catalogs??? ![]() What about updates and corrections to current material? If you consider the issue of access then for me pbooks will never be able to compete. People talk about books like they are fungible and universally available at any store. I don't want any book, I want THAT book. Most of the time I cannot obtain the books I read locally, most of the time I pay more for S&H than for the books themselves. I hate it. Ebook readers grant potentially universal access to all books (in print or otherwise). Now if any study can conclude that it's cheaper (and greener) to have every book locally available then I will go back to college and retake microeconomics 101. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 | ||||
Fanatic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 584
Karma: 914
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: iliad
|
As said, extreme overexaggerations don't explain anything. But yes even if would word it very differently, the core assumption is I guess the same, even if eBooks are not more environment friendly than paper books, a lot of other stuff speaks for eBooks, therefore we consider it "better". If it wouldn't, then it would really be just a step backward...
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by axel77; 08-21-2008 at 08:57 AM. |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
Quote:
Alex, (since I don't speak German) did the study address the environmental impact of hardware e-book readers themselves, or did it divorce readers from the e-book question? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
computer scientist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 108
Karma: 1587
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Gothenburg
Device: Gen 3
|
Is there some english version for this paper?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
environment, green, pollution, resources |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"The Lost Underwear," A Dan Brown Parody, by Daniela Green | Dr. Drib | Writers' Corner | 7 | 10-05-2009 03:48 PM |
Thoroughly recommended - "Deluxe" Penguin eBook of "The Odyssey" | HarryT | Reading Recommendations | 32 | 05-29-2009 12:07 AM |
"Are eBook Reading Devices Doomed?" | mizo9999 | News | 60 | 12-23-2008 08:20 AM |
Nick Hornby: "I'll never be caught reading an ebook" | grimo1re | News | 33 | 07-27-2008 04:14 AM |
Sony Reader PRS-505 gets a "green" review | Alexander Turcic | Sony Reader | 3 | 10-24-2007 09:00 AM |