![]() |
#151 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
Quote:
Unless, of course, you consider them to be overly-promoted by their publishers, and not representative of the variety of the genre... which pretty much zeroes out the OP in the first place. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#152 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
Quote:
Star Trek is mostly adventure SF and, at best, morality plays. The one time they had a chance to go Space Opera--the Dominion War--they downplayed the action and went for character drama. Great TV. Worth watching. Not Space Opera. (The rebooted movie shows promise, though. I'm waiting to see where the trilogy goes.) Not every rocket ship adventure is Space Opera. And not every attempt at space opera gets there. Space Opera is large scale; LENSMEN, DAHAK TRILOGY, LEGION OF SPACE, etc. Worlds Live, worlds die, entire civilizations at risk; larger than life heroes doing larger than life things. And it is done for *fun*. That is rare, especially done well. Entire decades have gone by without a single memorable Space Opera. (The 60's, for one.) Adventure SF is smaller scale. Usually more serious. And more common. Lots of fun, too. But very little of it lives up to Smith, Williamson, or Hamilton. Recently, the best practitioner (on occasion) is David Weber. (The first two Dahak Novels, yes; the third, no. Too pedestrian.) YMMV, of course. Edit: As I see it (which is all I can bring up now, without digging for some quotes from Aldiss and others) is that there is a big difference between bad, sloppy adventure SF and good Space Opera. SF is about ideas and even fun adventure SF should still explore a serious idea at its core. (Harry Harrison's ETHICAL ENGINEER, aka Deathworld 2, comes to mind.) Good Space Opera should have ideas by the dozen but they needn't be deeply explored, they just need to be coherent. Last edited by fjtorres; 03-29-2012 at 08:22 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#153 |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
Sorry, but to my mind, you just described Star Trek and Star Wars to a "T".
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#154 |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
Different mileage.
Or I'm not clear enough. That quote is a necessary but not sufficient condition; otherwise most sword and scorcery novels would be space opera. (Conan is definitely a larger than life Barbarian doing larger than life things. Ditto Fafhrd and the Gray mouser.) Even within SF, most action heroes are at least somewhat larger than life. Let me try again: SF is the genre. Literature of ideas. (No problem there, right?) Adventure SF is a type of SF where the narrative focuses on action adventure ("somebody having a bad day"). Space Opera is a sub-genre of SF where everything is amped to eleven but it stays coherent. Differences? A good adventure SF novel can have the hero making his way across an alien planet, fighting off monstruous creatures, slavers, pirates, and religious fanatics. (Farmer's GREEN ODYSSEY, Harrison's Deathworld 2.) A space opera novel will have the hero systematically making his way through an entire galaxy of slavers, drug dealers, and pirate fleets. Each challenge will be overcome in a different fashion, each challenge will be an order of magnitude harder. What the hero does, few can even aspire to do. And he'll do it in style. ![]() Scale makes a difference. (STAR TREK doesn't usually go big. SFX get too expensive. ![]() Intent makes a difference; Space Opera is for fun, but it still follows the rules of SF. (Which Star Wars doesn't.) To my mind, a lot of what people think of as Space Opera (including Wilson Tucker back in 1941 when he coined the term) is actually just bad adventure SF rather than the real thing, which requires *discipline* and consistency. But as you suggested, real Space Opera is a hard fit in this topic since pessimistic space opera is practically an oxymoron. On the other hand, pessimistic (even nihilistic) adventure SF is common. So, to get back on track, I'll offer up this: The ultimate pessimist believes each problem solution only spawns bigger problems and at the end, the sun goes nova. The ultimate optimist believes all problems have a satisfactory, happy solution and, if you wait long enough, somebody else will solve it for you. Everybody else fits somewhere between those two extremes. ![]() Last edited by fjtorres; 03-29-2012 at 09:14 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#155 |
Omnivorous
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 3,283
Karma: 27978909
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rural NW Oregon
Device: Kindle Voyage, Kindle Fire HD, Kindle 3, KPW1
|
I posted this over on Goodreads but I personally like this definition of Space Opera (from Wikipedia)
Hartwell and Cramer define space opera as "colorful, dramatic, large-scale science fiction adventure, competently and sometimes beautifully written, usually focused on a sympathetic, heroic central character and plot action, and usually set in the relatively distant future, and in space or on other worlds, characteristically optimistic in tone. It often deals with war, piracy, military virtues, and very large-scale action, large stakes." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#156 | |
Cynical Old Curmudgeon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,085
Karma: 8495696
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Halifax, Canada
Device: Kobo Mini, Kobo Arc, HTC Desire C
|
Quote:
![]() Last edited by JD Gumby; 03-29-2012 at 11:31 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#157 |
Connoisseur
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 99
Karma: 433632
Join Date: Dec 2011
Device: iPad
|
Genre labels are guidelines, not borders
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#158 | ||
Evangelist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 409
Karma: 49204386
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Belgium
Device: Kindle 4 + Asus Transformer
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() "Space western" makes me think of Firefly. This makes me sad... ![]() Would it be fair to say that Firefly was pessimistic? Scattered outer planets, mostly poor and remote. Central planets, wealthier but under strict government control. A small crew of misfits, standing up to the Alliance and evading Reavers, just trying to make a living... And then Serenity was a bit more Space Opera? |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#159 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
Quote:
Firefly was great because the narrative was built around the characters and the characters were recognizably human and with one exception far from super-human. Or even particularly noble or heroic. (By any definition of "hero".) And a pretty good political commentary on the perils of statism and entrenched bureaucracy; the central worlds ended up with a tyranny by inattention and political correctness. Whedon summarized it best in the one line: "We don't want to tell them what to think, just *how* to think." One would hope that whoever made the decision to cancel FIREFLY just as the show had found itself was properly chastised after UNIVERSAL bought the rights and made SERENITY. I'm pretty sure there are an infinity of parallel unverses where FIREFLY is still running to robust ratings. (Of course, it also means those universes didn't get Dr Horrible, Castle, or Dollhouse.) ![]() And speaking of pesimistic SF, you can hardly beat Dollhouse for its unflinching exploration of humans' ability to exploit each other and themselves. Dark themes darkly explored to great effect. So, of course, it got cancelled. The same as SGU, Space Above and Beyond, Caprica, and pretty much every example of intelligent SF on TV. Which should be no surprise, of course since SF is not a mass market genre by any stretch. Yup, we live in dark times without question. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#160 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
Quote:
Living on the frontier isn't necessarily considered a pessimistic theme; the main characters are working to avoid the life they don't want to live (under the Alliance, in Firefly's case). Labeling it optimistic or pessimistic pretty much depends on their success in doing so. I'd say Firefly was optimistic, considering they always managed to keep on flying. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#161 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,146
Karma: 11174187
Join Date: Jan 2011
Device: Sony 350, K3-3G, K4SO, KPW
|
I love the Lensman series - as long as I don't think about it too much. Great sweeping adventure in space, whole civilizations (well, Civilization itself, to use a Smith-ism) at risk... but the massive "one part is evil, all is evil" aspects, where entire worlds (probably full of innocent bystanders) are destroyed is, if you think about it too much, pretty horrible. And yet, I still re-read them periodically, just for the fun of it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#162 |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 28,617
Karma: 204624552
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
I'd say Firefly's optimism or pessimism was completely irrelevant to those that it resonated so strongly with... of which I'm one.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#163 |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 28,617
Karma: 204624552
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
So what do you think the keywords were in this thread that drew the attention of the jaki spam-bot?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#164 |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
Never underestimate the obtuseness of a spam-bot.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#165 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,230
Karma: 7145404
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southern California
Device: Kindle Voyage & iPhone 7+
|
I remain amazed that Whedon got away with an actual train robbery.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pessimistic new author introduction. | mmessina | Introduce Yourself | 13 | 03-21-2011 11:09 AM |
A pessimistic view of the future of book business | Barty | Amazon Kindle | 8 | 02-06-2011 11:26 AM |
Today's Feeling's | Kevin2960 | Lounge | 36 | 04-18-2010 04:57 PM |
Today's Apple announcement! | Nate the great | News | 18 | 09-10-2009 12:53 AM |
today's question | GeoffC | Lounge | 22 | 09-03-2008 11:02 AM |