| 
	|||||||
| View Poll Results: What sci fi sequel should I read next? | |||
| 2010: Odyssey Two | 
		 | 
	7 | 20.00% | 
| Rama II | 
		 | 
	7 | 20.00% | 
| The Long Dark Tea-time of the Soul (Dirk Gently, #2) | 
		 | 
	21 | 60.00% | 
| Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]()  | 
            
        
    
| 
             | 
        Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Member 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 19 
				Karma: 11840 
				Join Date: Jan 2011 
				Location: Seattle, WA, US 
				
				
				Device: Nook Simple Touch, Nook Color and Motorola Xoom 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			So I've started too many series recently and I can't decide which sequel to read next.  I've been on a huge Arthur C. Clarke kick lately (looooved Childhood's End) and recently finished reading 2001 for the first time.  I also recently read Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency and loved that as well.   
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	The 3 books I'm considering to read next are 2010, The Long Dark Tea-time of the Soul (Dirk Gently, #2), or Rama II. If I read Rama II or 2010, I'll probably want to finish off the respective series after that so that will help pick the next 2 books to read. So which series would you finish off first? - K  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Resident Curmudgeon 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 80,782 
				Karma: 150249619 
				Join Date: Nov 2006 
				Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts 
				
				
				Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			As I've read Rama I and didn't like it and I've read 2001 and 2010 and read Dirk, I voted for Dirk as that is the best of your choices.
		 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Wizard 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,613 
				Karma: 6718541 
				Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Paradise (Key West, FL) 
				
				
				Device: Current:Surface Go & Kindle 3 - Retired: DellV8p, Clie UX50, ... 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			I didn't vote as I can really evaluate all of the options. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	That said, I can say that there is no hurry to read 2010. Its a good read, but it is not really a sequel to 2001. It is, instead, an independent story (two stories really) set in the same universe. It integrates somewhat better with the movie version of 2001 than with the book version.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Fiend 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 148 
				Karma: 559930 
				Join Date: Apr 2011 
				
				
				
				Device: none 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			I absolutely love the Space Odyssey books.  Granted, they can be a bit heavy handed at times (especially later in the series) but they still stand out as one of my favorite sci-fi series.
		 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Junior Member 
			
			![]() Posts: 3 
				Karma: 10 
				Join Date: Jun 2011 
				Location: Ontario, Canada 
				
				
				Device: Kindle 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			2010: Odyssey Two is based on the move 2001 Space Odyssey and not the first book.  It was a strange case where they made the movie while the first book was being written.  They changed a few things in the movie to make things clearer for the audience.  If you're going to read 2010, make sure you watch 2001 Space Odyssey first.
		 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Member 
			
			![]() Posts: 16 
				Karma: 10 
				Join Date: Jun 2010 
				Location: Melbourne, Australia 
				
				
				Device: PB360 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			All good reads but in my opinion, Dirk Gently captures the flavour of the original best (though without being just a rehash)
		 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Member 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 19 
				Karma: 11840 
				Join Date: Jan 2011 
				Location: Seattle, WA, US 
				
				
				Device: Nook Simple Touch, Nook Color and Motorola Xoom 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			Thanks for the advice guys, Long Dark Tea Time of the Soul it is.   
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	   Sounds like I'll have to re-watch 2001 the movie soon to prep for 2010.
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Readaholic 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 255 
				Karma: 1058454 
				Join Date: Jul 2009 
				Location: Swindon, UK 
				
				
				Device: Sony PRS-T2 (previously 505 and 650) 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			I'm not sure you really need to rewatch the film of 2001 - if you've seen it you'll probably work out that some apparent continuity errors (change of planet around which TMA2 is located, etc) are due to the way Stanley Kubrick made the film.
		 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Mesmerist 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 331 
				Karma: 506558 
				Join Date: Sep 2009 
				Location: Spain 
				
				
				Device: PRS-600 Silver. Much nicer than I expected. 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			I voted 2010, just because I haven't read it. If you are a Clarke fan (as you seem to be), maybe go with one of the two choices that he wrote. The Dirk option seems to be if you want a laugh. You probably know more what you are in a mood for than we do. :-)
		 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#10 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Evangelist 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 415 
				Karma: 510423 
				Join Date: Nov 2006 
				
				
				
				Device: Sony PRS-505 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			The Dirk Gently series does not go downhill like the other 2.
		 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#11 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Grand Sorcerer 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 11,310 
				Karma: 43993832 
				Join Date: Feb 2010 
				Location: Monroe Wisconsin 
				
				
				Device: K3, Kindle Paperwhite, Calibre, and Mobipocket for  Pc (netbook) 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			I went with Rama. It's kinda a trick question since both Rama and Space Odyssey are by Arthur C. Clarke. lol.
		 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
            
        
    
            
  | 
    
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Sequel Questions | G J Lau | Writers' Corner | 19 | 05-06-2011 10:19 PM | 
| Sci-fi authors you (and I) should NEVER read | Dr. Drib | Reading Recommendations | 186 | 03-11-2011 10:03 PM | 
| Your #1 Fiction read after 1901 (NO Sci-fi or Fantasy) | DoctorOhh | Reading Recommendations | 14 | 01-09-2010 09:46 AM | 
| Sci-fi authors you (and I) should read | dougbiss | Reading Recommendations | 39 | 11-14-2009 08:48 AM |