| 
			
			 | 
		#121 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 A curiosus lector! 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 463 
				Karma: 2015140 
				Join Date: Jun 2012 
				
				
				
				Device: Sony PRS-T1, Kobo Touch 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			Kevin, could you also check why SanityCheck does not yell when there is no <p></p> at all in a html file (try it for yourself); here Win HP 64b, Sigil  0.8.901).
		 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#122 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Sigil Developer 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 9,072 
				Karma: 6361556 
				Join Date: Nov 2009 
				
				
				
				Device: many 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			Hi Arios, 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	It will not. It only checks for sanity - ie if the xhtml can actually be parsed and other major things like that. So any parseable xhtml text will pass. It is not a conformance checker like FlightCrew was. The whole idea with sanity checker is to prevent autocleaning from messing up. You can now quickly detect issues with parsing yourself and hand fix them, if you are worried that autofixing will hurt your code in some way. Sigil has outsourced all validation checks to plugins like FlightCrew and Doitsu's epubcheck. Hope this explains things. Kevin  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#123 | |
| 
			
			
			
			 Sigil Developer 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 9,072 
				Karma: 6361556 
				Join Date: Nov 2009 
				
				
				
				Device: many 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			Hi jugaor, 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	This bug is now fixed in Sigil master. The fix will appear in the upcoming Sigil-0.9.0. Thank you for your bug report and test case! KevinH Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#124 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 A curiosus lector! 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 463 
				Karma: 2015140 
				Join Date: Jun 2012 
				
				
				
				Device: Sony PRS-T1, Kobo Touch 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			Yes, thank you Kevin and have a nice week.
		 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#125 | ||||
| 
			
			
			
			 Enthusiast 
			
			![]() Posts: 36 
				Karma: 10 
				Join Date: Jun 2011 
				Location: Lima, Peru 
				
				
				Device: Kindle 10Gen / Kobo Aura HD / Nook STR 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 Quote: 
	
 By consistence with the former versions (iirc, since 0.6x) = "the first one is less intrusive", many upgraders could think my way ![]() Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
 Thank you very much both!  
		Last edited by jugaor; 11-02-2015 at 01:10 AM.  | 
||||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#126 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Yold 
			
			![]() Posts: 14 
				Karma: 10 
				Join Date: Sep 2011 
				
				
				
				Device: none 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			I used Sigil in the past (two years ago), and I want to use it again. At that time, I considered myself fairly adept as a user, but never had any knowledge of its internals, and never expect to have any. I'm wondering if it would be dangerous to download the new 0.8.901 version to play with, alongside (on the same computer) with the most current public release of Sigil (0.8.7 I think)?  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			I notice that DiapDealer recommends using the "Portable Apps' version of Sigil for the older version, but that doesn't quite give me the confidence I was hoping for. Any more straightforward way of using the newest publicly released standard version of Sigil alongside the newest beta Sigil? Thanks, -Jeff Last edited by JeffPalley; 11-02-2015 at 01:22 PM.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#127 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Sigil Developer 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 9,072 
				Karma: 6361556 
				Join Date: Nov 2009 
				
				
				
				Device: many 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			The only overlap is with the Sigil.ini file, which is why the Portable Apps version was recommended.   
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Alternatively, Just wait a week or so and Sigil-0.9.0 should be released and it will not be a pre-release. KevinH  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#128 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Yold 
			
			![]() Posts: 14 
				Karma: 10 
				Join Date: Sep 2011 
				
				
				
				Device: none 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			Kevin, 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Thanks, Jeff  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#129 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Grand Sorcerer 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 28,891 
				Karma: 207182180 
				Join Date: Jan 2010 
				
				
				
				Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			Yes. Multiple versions of the official Sigil on the same machine will still share the same Sigi.ini file. And hence the same preferences, the same plugins, and the same plugin configurations/preferences. That's the only reason I suggested the Portable Apps version for one of the versions (the older one in this case): so that they would truly be completely independent of each other. I can't, in good conscience, recommend running two different versions of Sigil that will be writing/accessing the same configuration files on the same machine. That's all. It's not that I don't have confidence in the stability of either version.
		 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#130 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Wizard 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,215 
				Karma: 8888888 
				Join Date: Jun 2010 
				
				
				
				Device: Kobo Clara HD,Hisence Sero 7 Pro RIP, Nook STR, jetbook lite 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			I just did a new build of Sigil--Linix Mint 17.2--and had a lot of: 
		
	
		
		
			Code: 
	warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare] The build seems to work ok. bernie  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#131 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Ex-Helpdesk Junkie 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 19,421 
				Karma: 85400180 
				Join Date: Nov 2012 
				Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity 
				
				
				Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only) 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			Warnings during compilation are totally normal. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Obviously, more could be done to make the code neater, silencing the warnings, but funnily enough that tends to be a lower priority for people/projects, who prefer working on the functionality. ![]() That's why they're warnings, not errors.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#132 | |
| 
			
			
			
			 Wizard 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,215 
				Karma: 8888888 
				Join Date: Jun 2010 
				
				
				
				Device: Kobo Clara HD,Hisence Sero 7 Pro RIP, Nook STR, jetbook lite 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 Quote: 
	
 ![]() I did not remember getting as many warning with my last build. bernie  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#133 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Ex-Helpdesk Junkie 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 19,421 
				Karma: 85400180 
				Join Date: Nov 2012 
				Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity 
				
				
				Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only) 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			I noticed a lot of the warnings were in the gumbo stuff  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	  less time to make that pretty I guess. ![]() And while I can certainly see them (gov't contractors) not focusing on functionality, I find it hard to believe they make up for it by beautifying the code either.  
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#134 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 eBook FANatic 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 18,301 
				Karma: 16078357 
				Join Date: Apr 2008 
				Location: Alabama, USA 
				
				
				Device: HP ipac RX5915 Wife's Kindle 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 
			
			[QUOTE=Arios;3194834] 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	And the incriminating crutledge's epub could now be renamed: Arios's Warning, The QUOTE] Arios, Was there something wrong with the book? What do I need to fix? Charlie  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#135 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Hmm. 
			
			![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 124 
				Karma: 2016606 
				Join Date: Oct 2015 
				
				
				
				Device: Android 4.2 Google Play Reader 
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
				
				Help with updating EPUB Sigil docs?
			 
			
			
			I swear just minutes ago there was a thread here about getting help with updating the Sigil EPUB docs. Does the author still need help with that? I know GIT and EPUB.  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	What is the forum username of the author anyway? I wanted to say "Thanks for Sigil". It's my preferred Epub editor.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
![]()  | 
            
        
            
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
            
  | 
    
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Sigil-0.8.900 released for testing - Wait for Sigil-0.8.901 | KevinH | Sigil | 106 | 10-04-2015 11:41 AM | 
| Sigil on Nook vs Sigil on Kobo vs Sigil on iBook | rosshalde | Sigil | 12 | 11-13-2014 10:34 AM | 
| Sigil 0.7 Beta (0.6.901) Available | user_none | Sigil | 51 | 02-10-2013 08:50 PM | 
| Sigil 0.5.901 for Mac | ajay42 | Sigil | 14 | 08-30-2012 10:22 AM | 
| Sigil 0.2.0 Release Candidates | Valloric | Sigil | 46 | 05-10-2010 10:55 PM |