![]() |
#1 |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 73,859
Karma: 315126578
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
|
Probability Fun
Here's a fun bit of probability calculation. Taken (with some changes to make me happier about the answer) from an article in the New Scientist magazine.
Dan and Nick are talking to each other. Nick has no prior knowledge of Dan or his family. Work out the probability, at each numbered stage of the conversation, that Dan has exactly two male children (BB) given the information to that stage. Assume that the probability of any child of any parent being a boy is exactly 1 in 2. Dan: I have exactly two children 1 Nick: Do you have at least one boy? Dan: Yes. 2 Nick: Do you have at least one boy born on a Tuesday? Dan: Yes. 3 I'll give the answers and reasoning behind the answers after there have been some comments. I will say that the probabilities at 1, 2 and 3 are all different. I just hope that some other people on Mobileread are also a bit geeky about probability ![]() Last edited by pdurrant; 06-10-2010 at 10:35 AM. Reason: Fixed the setup to make my answer correct! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Not scared!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 13,424
Karma: 81011643
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Midlands, UK
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 10, Huawei M5 10
|
Interesting post - thanks.
I guess that possible answers are: 1. Possible combinations are; BB, BG, GG. So the probability of it being BB is 1/3 2. If there is at least one boy, then the possible options are BB and BG. The probability in this case is 1/2 for me. 3. I have to admit that I am not quite geeky enough for this one - I'm struggling to see the relevance of the birth day of the child. I'm guessing it makes it more likely that they're two boys though? I'm sure somebody will enlighten me shortly ![]() Last edited by Bilbo1967; 06-09-2010 at 05:01 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,454
Karma: 37243
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Europe
Device: pocketbook 360, kindle 4
|
Hmm.
1) I'd say it's 1/4. It's 1/2 that the first child is a boy, and then another 1/2 that the second child is also a boy. 2)We discard the possibility that the first and second child are both girls, so we are left with three options, thus 1/3. 3) Erm... I've got to think a bit more about this ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
DSil
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 3,201
Karma: 6895096
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hants, UK
Device: Kindle, Cybook
|
Hmmm.. I shall have to read my New Scientist. Which edition?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I shall sleep on this one. And I shall blame you for a sleepless night..... ![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,454
Karma: 37243
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Europe
Device: pocketbook 360, kindle 4
|
Oh great. Three people, three different answers, and that's only for the first two, 'simpler' stages.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#6 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,793
Karma: 29028512
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Device: Sony PRS 600, Nook ST, Toshiba Excite 10.1 AT 300
|
The chance of 2 boys
At stage 1 is 1/4 BB BG GB GG At stage 2 the chance is now 1/2 either BG or BB At stage 3 it gets tricky. The chance of having either child born on a Tuesday is 2/7, of one of those children being a boy is 1/7. The chance of any particular child being a boy born on a Tuesday is 1/14. That being said we still are in the same predicament as stage 2 with one of the children being a boy. So I guess the odds at this stage are still 1/2. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
DSil
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 3,201
Karma: 6895096
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hants, UK
Device: Kindle, Cybook
|
Quote:
The first answer of 1/4, I'm confident of, since that is based on the importance of order (something tells me this is related to the difference between permutations and combinations....) Anyhow, my first attempt at the second answer ignored order, and I think that was wrong, whereas yours did take it into account. Thus I think that the second answer should be 1/3 as the possibilities are BB BG GB. If we were to expand the possibilities up each pair would come out to 49 possibilities. B(monday)B(monday), B(monday)B(tuesday), etc. However, we know that at least one boy was born on a tuesday, so the BG can only be expanded up to 7 possibilities each. B(tuesday)G(monday) and so on. By comparison, the BB expands up to 14 possibilities. So we have a total of 28 possibilities. So the answer to 3 is, I think 1/2. (i.e. 14 out of 28) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,454
Karma: 37243
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Europe
Device: pocketbook 360, kindle 4
|
Hmmm
![]() We know at least one boy was born on Tuesday. So we have the options: Girl (any day) - Boy (Tuesday) Boy (Tuesday) - Girl (any day) Boy (Tuesday) - Boy (any day) Boy (any day) - Boy (Tuesday) Boy (Tuesday) - Boy (Tuesday) I think the last probability is 3/5, or 0,6. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 5,161
Karma: 81026524
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Italy
Device: Kindle3, Ipod4, IPad2
|
Without any information we have
2B = 0.25 BG+GB= 0.5 GG=0.25 (the second is independent from the first one so we can add) with the knowlege that one at least is a boy we have to take away GG and renormalize to 1 so I divide for =.75. This gets BB=1/3 BG+GB =2/3 GG=0 Tuesday has nothing to do with it (it would have been like asking is one of your boys left handed? or with blue eyes, or sleeps at night?) so the probabilities remain the same. Last edited by beppe; 06-10-2010 at 01:29 AM. Reason: adding reason for adding |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 4,395
Karma: 1358132
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Device: Palm TX, CyBook Gen3
|
Could it be something to do with the odds of Nick guessing correctly about a boy being born on a Tuesday?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 73,859
Karma: 315126578
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 73,859
Karma: 315126578
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 73,859
Karma: 315126578
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 73,859
Karma: 315126578
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 73,859
Karma: 315126578
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
|
Umm... Well, not this week's (since I haven't got it yet) and not last week's. I think the one before that. If you have a subscription you can read it on-line here: http://www.newscientist.com/article/...html?full=true NB. Given the way the question is posed in the article, I disagree with their answer. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Simpler Probability Puzzle | pdurrant | Lounge | 3 | 08-06-2010 02:59 PM |
Fun at the supermarket | HarryT | Lounge | 1 | 12-17-2009 03:01 PM |
Please have fun and contribute! | Dr. Drib | Writers' Corner | 9 | 02-23-2009 10:18 AM |
Unutterably Silly fun reading | Nate the great | Lounge | 7 | 09-11-2008 08:23 PM |
Cory Doctorow on Probability Theory | Patricia | Lounge | 3 | 05-23-2008 12:12 PM |