View Single Post
Old 08-02-2007, 04:35 PM   #78
rlauzon
Wizard
rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.
 
rlauzon's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,018
Karma: 67827
Join Date: Jan 2005
Device: PocketBook Era
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Jordan View Post
(Ooh! Yuh got me!)

Maybe not, but marketing and advertising will put an "OK" book ghost-written for Dr. Phil on the NYT bestseller list.
And, unfortunately, will still not make an "OK" book a "great" book.

But you do bring up a good point: Just because a book is on the NYT best seller list doesn't mean that I'm going to like it. Just because a publisher thinks it good doesn't mean that the book is good.

This is both a benefit and a curse with eBooks. Anyone can publish a good book that the publishers think is bad (I'll point out Scott Siegler's Earthcore as an example) - but on the other hand, anyone can publish a bad book.
rlauzon is offline   Reply With Quote