Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Kaufman
But I don't understand how you can have read what you've read in my Huffington Post piece about the history of Nazi Genicide and destruction of the PHYSICAL book, and still not understand why your ownership and advocacy of a machine created to displace the book as a cultural artifact is a kind of cultural crime and prefigures a totalitarian condition that could lead to genocide. Why is it so impossible for you to grasp that what you are engaging in, doing, is destroying the world of books, one of the principal pillars upon which decent society has rested, and you are replacing what you destroy with a kind of nihilistic apathetic cult of convenience. Further, you are willing to trade away your privacy and individual freedom by subsidizing an electronic fake book linked to networks that keep track of what you read. Why is it so hard to grasp that wharever benefit you believe accrues for you from these machines is rubbish compared to the cultural traditions and human freedoms that you are blithely trampling on. I don't understand how you don't see that and must conclude that there is something fundamentally changed in you as the result of your immersion in the culture of these soul-destroying gadgets. They have wounded your moral perception, your abiility to weigh and measure consequences. You and your fellow e-bookers and high-techers are guilty. I accuse you all of gross cultural irresponsability that has lead to the imminent downfall of the book iindustry and the desruction of book culture and I regard it as little less than an economic and cultural war crime of sorts, no less than any Nazi who burned a book. For like him, you are thoughtless, ignorant of history and its consequences and clueless as to the horrors that you are inviting into our lives by destroying the sacred book.
|
Okay... One LAST TIME! It is NOT the medium used that is important. What is important is the *MESSAGE*. If the story, data/history or instructions are inscribed upon a gold plate, wall of a cave, sheet of paper or electronically displayed on a screen, that can be transmitted to the reader. I don't really care if I read it via black dots on a white (light gray) screen or black dots on a white (pale beige) sheet of paper. Either way, I'm gaining knowledge or entertainment.
Where your premise fails is you claim that the method of inputting this information is more important than what information is input. If I only read Hitlerian lies and propaganda, I'm not going to have as positive a world view no matter *HOW* I read it. So the real problem is that I (under this scenario) have self-limited (or perhaps my input is being manipulated by 'other powers', in which case I may not be aware of the limits) the data.
You should be far more concerned that people may not be getting the full picture. You are not. Instead, you scream that the medium is more important than the message and cry that we need to restrict people's freedom of choice. That, my so ill-educated and dangerously ignorant friend, is why people are reacting so negatively to your message. In essence, you are acting as a 'useful idiot' for those who would limit individual freedoms.
'Nough said?
Derek