View Single Post
Old 01-15-2025, 01:11 PM   #2
JSWolf
Resident Curmudgeon
JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
JSWolf's Avatar
 
Posts: 79,961
Karma: 146918083
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSmitty View Post
I have a Libra Colour 2 and do enjoy it. Over the last couple of months in watching various videos and articles comparing the Libra Colour to the Kindle Colorsoft it seems like the color on the Kindle device is better, more true, and pronounced?

Anyway, I was curious if there were a consensus as to a CFA mode (in devmode) that comes close or is better looking than the colorsoft?

Are these modes safe to use in general?

Thanks
Actually, the color on the Colorsoft is worse. I've seen video & images where there is a lot of detail in the images missing on the CS. Also, the images can be muddy especially with darker colors. There was an image of a cover where you could not read a line of text on the CS but on the Libra Colour, it was no problem. With the LC, the detail is in images is not missing. This is not to say that all images are missing detail and/or are muddy on the CS. But it happens and when it does, it looks terrible.
JSWolf is offline   Reply With Quote