Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirtel
I've never said that the current Oasis is exceptionally lightweight or ergonomic. I said that it is lightweight and ergonomic, not that it's exceptionally so. And that's my personal opinion, not a fact. Someone else may well think otherwise. Just as you do.
You're stating that what you believe are facts, not opinions. Prove that the Oasis is not ergonomic, then. So far you've said nothing to prove that. Yes, you've said that it's not as lightweight and ergonomic as the first version was, but no one is arguing with that. Of course it isn't. That doesn't mean it's NOT ergonomic, or that it's a failure. You, of course, think so, but you have proved nothing so far.
|
This is another thing that you do.
Instead of coming up with any arguments yourself, you just repeat what I said, with a "No, you are!!!".
I asked you to proof your statements.
Instead of doing so, you falsely claim that I have not proven mine...
But I have explained the Oasis concept to you.
I have given you the facts, that made the original Oasis particulary lightweight and ergonomic.
I have given you the facts, why the Oasis 2/3 does not fulfill this concept anymore.
Go back and read up on them yourself. I am not going to constantly repeat myself, just for you to ignore it again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirtel
You argue that it's the fact that the current Oasis is not ergonomic and the logical conclusion is, everyone should therefore find it uncomfortable to hold. But many people don't. Why is that?
|
No, that is not what I have said.
I did not say that it cannot be comfortable to hold and I did not say, that people should or cannot like it.
I said, that it lost almost everything, that once made it particulary ergonomic. (Again, see previous posts...) And that this is one of the reasons, why I believe, Amazon won't pursue this concept any further.