Quote:
Originally Posted by kyôdai
It is very much possible to proof wether something is ergonomic to the human body.
|
To an extent, yes. But not to the small details, any more than it's possible to prove which colors, smells or tastes are the most pleasing. If that was true, we'd all have the exact same furniture in our homes, in exactly the same color and we'd eat exactly the same things. And we all would use the exact same ereader.
An example: my sister bought a supposedly very ergonomic pillow. And she liked it. But her husband couldn't sleep with that pillow at all. So, if it's possible to predict the ergonomics of things to the smallest details, why was the pillow not comfortable for him?
You argue that it's the fact that the current Oasis is not ergonomic and the logical conclusion is, everyone should therefore find it uncomfortable to hold. But many people don't. Why is that?
Quote:
|
I have proven to you, that the original Oasis was exceptionally lightweight and ergonomic. So get going. Proof to us, that the current Oasis still is.
|
I've never said that the current Oasis is exceptionally lightweight or ergonomic. I said that it is lightweight and ergonomic, not that it's exceptionally so. And that's my personal opinion, not a fact. Someone else may well think otherwise. Just as you do.
You're stating that what you believe are facts, not opinions. Prove that the Oasis is not ergonomic, then. So far you've said nothing to prove that. Yes, you've said that it's not as lightweight and ergonomic as the first version was, but no one is arguing with that. Of course it isn't. That doesn't mean it's NOT ergonomic, or that it's a failure. You, of course, think so, but you have proved nothing so far.