Quote:
Originally Posted by davidfor
Which is good. Because you should never recommend a device that you have not used. At the most, you should say whether something might work for the person who is asking about a device. Honestly, until a few people actually use these devices for purposes other than reviews, we have no idea how good or bad they are.
In that case, exactly what do you think the purpose of this device is? And why is Wacom the only way to go for pen type touch?
Whereas you just pile shit upon it without any real justification.
And before you claim that this is proof that Kobo fans "defend every garbage produced there", please point out exactly where I have suggested anyone should get the Elipsa. Or where I have told someone that the only device to get is a Kobo.
|
There are other good touch pen techs like Apple's Pencil and Microsoft's N-trig. Kobo's is active capactive which is generally not the best in accuracy, requires a AAAA battery and can only be replaced by another one from the manufacturer. It's the cheapest way to add pen tech and doesn't require a special screen layer.
Wacom EMR is desirable because unlike others it doesn't use a battery so there's no charging and no hunting for AAAA batteries when it dies. It's also pretty accurate and you can easily use a pen designed for one Wacom EMR device on another like the Samsung S-pen on a Boox device or vice versa and there is a selection of 3rd party Wacom pens like the Lamy, Staeldler etc.