View Single Post
Old 03-05-2021, 06:59 PM   #62
j.p.s
Grand Sorcerer
j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 5,816
Karma: 103362673
Join Date: Apr 2011
Device: pb360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynx-lynx View Post
Please post the image into this discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by j.p.s View Post
Image copyright is independent of text copyright.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynx-lynx View Post
is the image under question an image, or is it a stylised drawing within the text? And is it a matter of difference


Anything pre 1955 is out of copyright here in Aus
Illustration copyright is independent of text copyright, I used the word image because you did. If you are going to split hairs over image versus drawing, then you sort out which it is.

What matters is that the illustrator holds the illustration copyright.

For better or worse, copyright most of the time depends on date of death, not date of publication. Theodor Seuss Geisel died 1991. He was also an illustrator. If he made this illustration, then the distinction in copyright is moot.
j.p.s is offline   Reply With Quote