View Single Post
Old 02-25-2016, 08:11 PM   #7
murg
No Comment
murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,240
Karma: 23878043
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo: Not just an eReader, it's an adventure!
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
That's what I thought. Just curious, really. I'd heard something similar with regard to Supreme Court Justice appointments and was wondering why people even thought to suggest such a thing--let alone why anyone would actually entertain the idea of yielding that right.

"Please don't exercise your rare right mainly because we don't like you; and we think it would be a nice gesture on your part to accommodate this request (a request that we ourselves, of course, would never agree to in a million years). Thanks."
Apparently the Senators are using a series of lengthening legalist phrasing to cover this that is getting more and more specific. And incorrect. The latest Last Week Tonight with John Oliver show has a very good segment on this.

Last edited by murg; 02-26-2016 at 01:00 AM.
murg is offline