View Single Post
Old 10-20-2015, 10:12 PM   #7
Gregg Bell
Gregg Bell
Gregg Bell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Gregg Bell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Gregg Bell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Gregg Bell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Gregg Bell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Gregg Bell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Gregg Bell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Gregg Bell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Gregg Bell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Gregg Bell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Gregg Bell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Gregg Bell's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,266
Karma: 3917598
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Itasca, Illinois
Device: Kindle Touch 7, Sony PRS300, Fire HD8 Tablet
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinisajoy View Post
Gregg,
The sentence does not make sense.
Are her vulnerability and inability the same thing?
Maybe you should change the sentence a bit. Vulnerability and inability sound redundant.
Yeah, it does, Cin. "her inability to tolerate ridicule" is an appositive phrase that refers to "Her vulnerability."

#1) Her vulnerability, her inability to tolerate ridicule, had led her to kill another human being.

The problem is I like to write sentences (and indeed this is how I wrote it) like #2.

#2) Her vulnerability, her inability to tolerate ridicule had led her to kill another human being.

Yes, the sentence can be re-written, but does sentence #2 fly, especially meaning-wise? (Of course you've already said it doesn't. But reconsider, will ya? ) See, I just hate throwing that second comma after "had." It just breaks the sentence like a sledgehammer.

I know I write weird. This is not news to me. I just want to see if other people can comprehend my meaning.
Gregg Bell is offline   Reply With Quote