I show a kind of summary and add a final consideration.
To comment on the images other experts are called possibly more.
Test runs (as practiced in the thread)
Atf→Append to field
Rf→Replace field
Sr→Split result (c→crossed / unc→uncrossed)
Summary table (
Test text &
Test result entries in
Your test: and
Book 1: etc. rows with different regex values)
Test result entries of
Book 1: etc. rows are the final (new) titles (tested, without being shown here).
Makes sense!
Not making sense and IMO illogical is that in
Your test: row depending of the regex values the corresponding final results once is
Test result entry alone - in other cases these are the
Test text &
Test result entries together.
Quote:
Originally Posted by theducks
IMHO the test line is optional
It is useful for testing for unwanted side effects ( that might appear on longer inputs)
Acurate Test results is what you want. No unintended side effects  showing |
Not to let us die
completely stupid please show by a contrived example what you mean with these ominous
''unwanted side effects''. That would be very interesting and helpful for a better understanding of the whole.