View Single Post
Old 03-10-2012, 09:36 AM   #82
mr ploppy
Feral Underclass
mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
mr ploppy's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,622
Karma: 26821535
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Yorkshire, tha noz
Device: 2nd hand paperback
Quote:
Originally Posted by HansTWN View Post
As with any crime, when all the evidence points at you, you will have some explaining to do. Even if you are innocent. Somebody steals your credit card and buys material to make a bomb. Will you be get a visit by the police and asked to explain and will you have to cooperate? Oh yes. Does that mean you will be convicted, no. Innocent people come under suspicion all the time. That doesn't mean that they are being found guilty. But if there is evidence, you should help to clear it up. It is in your best interest.

That is the way the system always works.
The key point being evidence. In the Thomas and Tenenbaum cases, evidence of wrongoing was proved so it is obviously possible to do. So the real question would be what is there to be gained from removing the need to provide any evidence?
mr ploppy is offline   Reply With Quote