View Single Post
Old 12-08-2011, 06:25 PM   #28
j.p.s
Grand Sorcerer
j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 5,815
Karma: 103362673
Join Date: Apr 2011
Device: pb360
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRussel View Post
Sorry, j.p.s, but Shopaholic is absolutely right. Lending a book to someone should be just that. Off your bookshelf if a pBook, or deleted from Calibre and your eReader if an eBook. Passing out multiple copies is not acceptable unless explicitely allowed by the author/publisher. I don't think that's splitting hairs, I think that's a very important distinction.
I'm sorry, I never wrote anything claiming that it is OK to copy a protected work without permission. I wrote that just as lending a book is different from copying a book because the lender does not have the book while it is lent, copying a book is different from stealing a book because the book copy owner still has his copy.

Copying a book is not stealing the book. Not stealing does not make copying OK. Copying not being OK does not make it stealing.

All those are similar distinctions or similar hair splitting.
j.p.s is offline   Reply With Quote