I apologize, again, I know this is off topic (and possibly approaching a violation of MR topic rules) but I wonder if I misunderstood something here:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwreck
For example: It's possible I wouldn't have decided the rampant homophobia and sex-negativity in Card's works were too extreme just based on blog reviewers.
.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwreck
He manages not to showcase the homophobia by the simple expedient of not having any bisexual or homosexual characters.
|
Are you saying the absence of homosexual characters constitutes 'rampant homophobia?'
ApK