View Single Post
Old 04-17-2011, 04:14 PM   #233
Piper_
~~~~~
Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Piper_ ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Piper_'s Avatar
 
Posts: 761
Karma: 1278391
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: USA
Device: Kindle 3, Sony 350
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools View Post
DRM isn't copyright, but it is a way of defending copyright. If there is a better way, then I 'm all for it. But neither I, nor you, nor anyone on this forum, can think of a better way, so here we are. Apparently you are OK with paying lip service with the idea of defending copyright. You just don't like anyone coming up with any effective way of doing it.
[...]
We've given a better way*, but all we get is crickets from you, and continued denials and accusations like this.

Just as I suspected we would, because, while it would stop the "large scale casual sharing" you say is all you care about, it wouldn't force us to buy another copy for anyone who doesn't share our account or format.

IOW, publishers want a scheme that forces us to pay what you actually defend as a "stupid tax."

*Some of us have repeatedly proposed that the purchaser's receipt information be added to the ebook's metadata/jacket.
Piper_ is offline   Reply With Quote