View Single Post
Old 03-25-2011, 12:34 PM   #62
mike_bike_kite
Digitally confused
mike_bike_kite ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mike_bike_kite ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mike_bike_kite ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mike_bike_kite ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mike_bike_kite ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mike_bike_kite ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mike_bike_kite ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mike_bike_kite ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mike_bike_kite ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mike_bike_kite ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mike_bike_kite ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
mike_bike_kite's Avatar
 
Posts: 500
Karma: 1500000
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: London, UK
Device: KPW, K2i, Nexus 7 32gb, Kobo Mini
Quote:
For a civil case, the burden of proof is "on the balance of probabilities", rather than "beyond reasonable doubt".
All the proof you speak about (the IP address and the MAC address of your computer) is just data passing over a network. Those values can be altered. Would guilt still be beyond reasonable doubt?

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Should I be able to get away with my illegal activities simply by leaving my WiFi unsecured?
But even if you secure your wifi then it still only takes less than 10 minutes to break (assuming you're using WEP). Then your neighbour (or his kids) can download anything over your network.

Should you still be held responsible then?
mike_bike_kite is offline   Reply With Quote