View Single Post
Old 03-01-2011, 02:10 PM   #604
HamsterRage
Evangelist
HamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notes
 
HamsterRage's Avatar
 
Posts: 435
Karma: 24326
Join Date: Jun 2010
Device: Kobo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namekuseijin View Post
In case you haven't noticed already, the OP is proposing precisely getting away with the need to pay for a work of art, any such work, which I concluded would also mean music performance. Pay if will, not because an artist also needs to pay his bills...
No I didn't notice that, because it doesn't say anything of the sort. I just went back and reread the OP. It talks about copyright, and electronic media making copyright obsolete.

But I don't see anything about forcing musicians to play live performances for free. No matter how hard I read between the lines.
HamsterRage is offline   Reply With Quote