Quote:
Originally Posted by EricDP
People really need to let go of the "book" analogy and accept that you can read something that isn't a book. Books only had two 'panels' because printing double-sided was the easiest way to cut the thickness of a book in half. Most electronic reading devices are already quite a bit thinner than a book, and by making it double-screen you actually double to thickness of the closed book - something I'd rather not have.
|
and you have seen this theoretic device in a working prototype? Don't condescend to this group of people, we have been talking about these things for a long while now...everyone has different needs. Just because your or my needs don't fit with someone else's does not mean other style devices should not be made.
Think about it...do we need sports cars, mini vans, compact cars, SUV's, electric drive vehicles, gasoline powered vehicles...etc...I mean they all are the same so only on type of vehicle needs to be made for everyone.
One style of clothes for men and women, all the same color and all the same size...I hope you see the point here...
I want them to make devices like you prefer as well as devices I prefer and other devices others prefer...ask out buddies in Ukraine how things were when the idea of one-size fits all worked out...and how things are now with freedom of choice.