Originally Posted by pdurrant
See my previous posts about second-hand copies.
Well, it seems that, by and large, most posters agree with the summary you posted way back in post #2.
It is interesting, however, that all of the arguments for and against your propositions have been based on economic, quasi-economic or legal grounds.
None (as far as I can decipher them) on ethical grounds.
Probably because it wasn't a question of ethics in the first place, there never having been any valid moral or ethical justification for monopoly intellectual property rights.