|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
10-19-2014, 11:54 PM | #1 |
Bah, humbug!
Posts: 39,073
Karma: 157049943
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA, USA
Device: Kindle Oasis, iPad Pro, & a Samsung Galaxy S9.
|
October 2014 Discussion: The Man Who Would Be King (spoilers)
The time has come to discuss the October 2014 MobileRead Book Club selection, The Man Who Would Be King by Rudyard Kipling. What did you think?
|
10-20-2014, 03:33 PM | #2 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,638
Karma: 28483498
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ottawa Canada
Device: Sony PRS-T3, Galaxy (Aldiko, Kobo app)
|
Short and sweet. The Freemasonry element was interesting. Was the narrator only a newspaper editor, or was he a British political agent?
|
Advert | |
|
10-20-2014, 10:21 PM | #3 |
Bah, humbug!
Posts: 39,073
Karma: 157049943
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA, USA
Device: Kindle Oasis, iPad Pro, & a Samsung Galaxy S9.
|
The narrator was a thinly disguised Rudyard Kipling. He spent many years as an assistant editor for a newspaper in India. He was loyal to the Crown, but I don't think he was ever an agent.
|
10-21-2014, 12:12 AM | #4 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,631
Karma: 73864785
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: PDXish
Device: Kindle Voyage, various Android devices
|
I read it but wasn't that impressed. Not sure whether or not it was my expectations or what, but this story just didn't do anything for me.
My only other exposure to Kipling is Rikki-Tikki-Tavi (which is one of my daughter's favorites now). I plan on reading the rest of the Jungle Book with her at some point, hopefully it is better. |
10-21-2014, 05:20 PM | #5 |
Guru
Posts: 820
Karma: 8820388
Join Date: Dec 2008
Device: Sony PRS-505, -350; Kindle 3 3G, DX, PW 2; various tablets
|
Eh?
It seemed full of kooky characters and kooky behaviors, like Kipling was writing it on an imaginative lark. So I couldn't even trust that it was giving an accurate view into those places and that time. If I were able to trust it, then I would be able to say that it seems that Afghanistan has always had rough terrain and fighting. I was made to memorize Kipling's poem "If" when I was a boy, and found it quite amazing. So I expected more from my first other Kipling. |
Advert | |
|
10-26-2014, 06:21 AM | #6 |
Indie Advocate
Posts: 2,863
Karma: 18794463
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Device: Kindle
|
I didn't mind this. Was it actually more about India than Afghanistan do you think? There was something about the Kafiristan people being more English than the English that reminded me of comments made about Indians under British rule.
It was interesting that Kipling chose two distinctly biblical images in the ejection of our rogues from Kafiristan. The beheading of one, a little like John the Baptist - the head is later presented to the narrator, and the crucifixion of the other - proclaimed more a God because he survived the act. Given that they had set themselves up as gods, I found this quite interesting. |
10-26-2014, 01:48 PM | #7 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,368
Karma: 26886344
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ireland
Device: Kindle Oasis 3, 4G, iPad Air 2, iPhone IE
|
Kipling's poetry was extravagantly admired during his life time and even for a while after his death. This was certainly because he wrote quite vigorously and was regarded as a great advocate of the great British Empire upon whom the sun never set. While some of his poetry is still appreciated, it hasn't aged well and one can only read about "The White man's burden" with embarrassment and give him a pardon for being a child of his times.
But the same cannot be said about his prose--the short stories in particular. He had an astonishing versatility and fecundity of inspiration and this frequently includes a darkly cynical edge with the British characters who are neither enlightened nor civilised. This is the case with "The Man Who Would Be King". The two main characters are certainly rogues, swindlers, liars and cheats. But do they deserve what happens to them? They are both defeated by their humanity and the all-powerful, strange, alien world they try to control. When Peachey makes his final trip, he speaks in the third person as if his basic self is gone and his sanity has been usurped by the power of the terrible land he tried to control: "They was cruel enough to feed him up in the temple, because they said he was more of a God than old Daniel that was a man. Then they turned him out on the snow, and told him to go home, and Peachey came home in about a year, begging along the roads quite safe; for Daniel Dravot he walked before and said, 'Come along, Peachey. It's a big thing we're doing.' The mountains they danced at night, and the mountains they tried to fall on Peachey's head, but Dan he held up his hand, and Peachey came along bent double. He never let go of Dan's hand, and he never let go of Dan's head. They gave it to him as a present in the temple, to remind him not to come again; and though the crown was pure gold and Peachey was starving, never would Peachey sell the same. You know Dravot, Sir! You knew Right Worshipful Brother Dravot! Look at him now!" And what of the strange ambiguous ending? Indeed who are the villains in this amazing evocative story set in India? This is the "dark" Kipling at his best. |
11-01-2014, 12:04 PM | #8 | ||
languorous autodidact ✦
Posts: 4,235
Karma: 44637926
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: smiling with the rising sun
Device: onyx boox poke 2 colour, kindle voyage
|
Excellent review, fantasyfan!
I unfortunately only thought this was mediocre, and it's a shame since I was looking forward to it. I like a good adventure tale, I like the time period and setting, but I just found the story lacking. Perhaps I'm overlooking some interesting meaning to it. I think it was very interesting to set a story in Kafiristan; it's "exotic" and no longer really exists anymore in the present day (the whole area has basically been "Islamified" and the people either killed or converted excepted for a very small minority now). But the story's much more a fantasy than anything realistic, and even that's fine if it were interesting, a sort of an "into the jungle" adventure tale with treacherous mountains instead. I just found everything so obvious or random in the story and the characters and situation not particularly engaging. I did enjoy the last few pages, but it didn't make up for the rest. Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MobileRead February 2014 Discussion: Outlander by Diana Gabaldon (spoilers) | WT Sharpe | Book Clubs | 30 | 09-27-2015 06:32 PM |
MobileRead September 2014 Discussion: The Grapes of Wrath (spoilers) | WT Sharpe | Book Clubs | 18 | 10-26-2014 02:37 PM |
MobileRead October 2012 Discussion: Carmilla by J. Sheridan LeFanu (spoilers) | WT Sharpe | Book Clubs | 24 | 04-01-2014 01:01 AM |
MobileRead Discussion: Old Man's War by John Scalzi (spoilers) | pilotbob | Book Clubs | 19 | 01-03-2011 02:34 AM |
MobileRead Discussion: Professor and the Mad Man by Winchestor Simon (spoilers) | pilotbob | Book Clubs | 32 | 04-14-2009 07:12 PM |