06-11-2023, 01:44 AM | #1 | |
Gentleman and scholar
Posts: 10,994
Karma: 108312789
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Space City, Texas
Device: Clara HD; Nook ST w/Glowlight, (2015) Glowlight Plus, Paperwhite 3
|
How AI art killed an indie book cover contest
Here's an article that come up today: How AI art killed an indie book cover contest
So there was a contest to create a cover for the indie book Bob the Wizard. The rules stipulated no use of AI tools. The award-winning cover by an artist named Sean Mauss (attachment below) was immediately placed under suspicion of being at least partly manipulated by AI tools. Some internet sleuthing proved it. The author is now working with a different artist to replace the cover. Quote:
It reminds me of back when Tron wasn't even considered in the Oscar nominations for best visual effects, because the Academy felt that the use of computers was in some way cheating. I can understand magazines placing bans on AI-generated stories. I could understand a contest banning completely AI generated images. But insisting there be absolutely no AI involvement in imagine generation feels a little Luddite to me. There are ways to use these tools that are unique and creative. I think the cover looks great. Last edited by ZodWallop; 06-11-2023 at 01:50 AM. |
|
06-11-2023, 05:06 AM | #2 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,174
Karma: 63764653
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Kobo Glo HD
|
Interesting that a cover that used AI tools won the contest.
|
Advert | |
|
06-11-2023, 09:02 AM | #3 | |
the rook, bossing Never.
Posts: 11,168
Karma: 85874891
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ireland
Device: All 4 Kinds: epub eink, Kindle, android eink, NxtPaper11
|
Quote:
AI art is at worst pure plagiarism and at best a lie. There is no shortage at all of too cheap decent human artists. Also the Luddites have a bad press. They didn't object to machines, but worse pay and conditions while the mill owners made 100x to 1000x profit compared to paying workers at home on their own loom. And the anti-AI sentiment is also not about anti-machine (or computers) but exploitation of human created content with no payment at all by massive corporations. There is also a massive environmental cost with such "advanced" AI as used in LLM and image generation. A so-called "AI plug-in" filter in a digital image editing / drawing package isn't the issue. Last edited by Quoth; 06-11-2023 at 09:08 AM. |
|
06-11-2023, 10:11 AM | #4 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,003
Karma: 12012526
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Canada
Device: Sony PRS-650
|
Should a photographer be allowed to take credit for a picture created by a camera? How about a camera that makes automatic adjustments to improve the image? Or a camera that combines three images to create a better one? What if the photographer takes a picture of something made by another person, or many other people, like a cityscape? Should they be able to take credit for it, or do they need to make sure the credit is fairly distributed, and maybe paid for? It's a slippery slope when we let machines create art.
|
06-11-2023, 10:52 AM | #5 | |
the rook, bossing Never.
Posts: 11,168
Karma: 85874891
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ireland
Device: All 4 Kinds: epub eink, Kindle, android eink, NxtPaper11
|
Quote:
HDR and related by combining images is just a tool. Even image processing "plug-in" filters are just tools, like dark room dodging, or printing an image the size of a wall, and editing with paint, then re-photographing. AI generated images are using at the input images mad by other unknown humans processed without any acknowledgement of the multiple sources. Photography with images that could be preserved is about 190 years old. The idea of it and experiments are much older. Certainly some famous "old masters" used the Camera Obscura principle to project the scene to a flat surface. But they created the scene and framing of it, just as digital photographers and movie makers do today. The point is that AI images is a lie. They are not made from scratch by "clever" programming. They totally rely on other images, usually copied without permission, citing of source or anything. AI is fundamentally a lie. There is no real AI. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_photography |
|
Advert | |
|
06-11-2023, 11:02 AM | #6 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 27,552
Karma: 193191846
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
I'm not chuffed at all. It will all shake out and our descendents will wonder why there was ever a brouhaha in the first place. But chicken-littling before (and during) paradigm shifts seems to be somewhat instinctual to humans.
|
06-11-2023, 12:10 PM | #7 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 5,285
Karma: 98804578
Join Date: Apr 2011
Device: pb360
|
Are you sure that you are using the commonly accepted meaning of chuffed?
|
06-11-2023, 12:19 PM | #8 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 27,552
Karma: 193191846
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
Quote:
My point is that I don't care how art might be created. I only care if looking at it; listening to it; reading it is a pleasant (or edifying) experience for me. Last edited by DiapDealer; 06-11-2023 at 12:25 PM. |
|
06-11-2023, 12:47 PM | #9 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 5,285
Karma: 98804578
Join Date: Apr 2011
Device: pb360
|
|
06-11-2023, 01:08 PM | #10 |
Bibliophagist
Posts: 35,498
Karma: 145557716
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Forma, Clara HD, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
|
Last time I looked, as British army slang, chuffed had two meanings in pleased and displeased. You have to infer from context/tone/whatever which meaning is meant.
So "my fiancee was chuffed to see me" could mean either she was pleased or displeased to see me. And they wonder why I prefer computers... |
06-11-2023, 07:22 PM | #11 |
Custom User Title
Posts: 8,644
Karma: 61234567
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Canada
Device: Kobo Libra H2O, formerly Aura HD
|
I thought the future was supposed to be robots doing the boring/dangerous jobs so that us squishy humans can work on the arts.
Instead, the robots are the ones doing painting and poetry. Probably because it makes rich people more money. |
06-11-2023, 08:09 PM | #12 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 27,552
Karma: 193191846
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
|
06-11-2023, 10:32 PM | #13 | ||
Gentleman and scholar
Posts: 10,994
Karma: 108312789
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Space City, Texas
Device: Clara HD; Nook ST w/Glowlight, (2015) Glowlight Plus, Paperwhite 3
|
Quote:
The AI models do scan and learn from what exists, but it's not like it takes that and spits out an image of Gainesborough's Blue Boy with Mona Lisa's hair pasted on top. Star Wars is an amalgamation of Flash Gordon and Dune. Everything is based is based on or influenced by something else. Quote:
Last edited by ZodWallop; 06-11-2023 at 11:37 PM. |
||
06-11-2023, 10:36 PM | #14 |
Gentleman and scholar
Posts: 10,994
Karma: 108312789
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Space City, Texas
Device: Clara HD; Nook ST w/Glowlight, (2015) Glowlight Plus, Paperwhite 3
|
Look, let's get together, you, I and Sean Mauss (the artist that created the cover in question). Give all three of us the same tools, some assignment and three days and let's see what each of us produces. Human involvement and talent matters.
|
06-12-2023, 03:55 AM | #15 | |
the rook, bossing Never.
Posts: 11,168
Karma: 85874891
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ireland
Device: All 4 Kinds: epub eink, Kindle, android eink, NxtPaper11
|
Quote:
Don't conflate tools, even ones using AI as branding, and these ecologically damaging AI enabled by content scraped of the internet. It's not the same as humans inspired by other humans. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kobo's Best Indie Cover Contest | gmw | Writers' Corner | 52 | 01-06-2020 10:18 PM |
Aura HD Small book cover art | berklon | Kobo Reader | 1 | 08-17-2013 04:32 PM |
book cover art sources | cybmole | Calibre | 5 | 11-02-2010 12:48 PM |
Indie Author Appreciation Contest | Mary McDonald | Self-Promotions by Authors and Publishers | 0 | 07-11-2010 01:27 PM |
Unutterably Silly Imaginary Book Cover Art - YOURS! | vivaldirules | Lounge | 22 | 01-17-2009 08:54 PM |