OI-on-SD live rel 0.2 not working on BeBook One 2010

marisr · 06-21-2010, 05:59 AM

I'm using the original firmware V2.02NL.100430 on my Bebook One 2010. I try to install the OI-on-SD live version rel2.0 (oi-hanlin-v3all-live-0.2.zip). But when I start the file boot-OI-V3.exe.fb2 on my BeBook, a screen with a gear is shown shortly, and then it returns to the bookshelf page.
On my SD card (1 GB, FAT16) a file boot.log.txt is created that contains the message "insmod: cannot insert '/root/abook/reloaded.ko': invalid module format (-1): Exec format error".
Do I make a mistake?

mbovenka · 06-21-2010, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marisr

I'm using the original firmware V2.02NL.100430 on my Bebook One 2010. I try to install the OI-on-SD live version rel2.0 (oi-hanlin-v3all-live-0.2.zip). But when I start the file boot-OI-V3.exe.fb2 on my BeBook, a screen with a gear is shown shortly, and then it returns to the bookshelf page.
On my SD card (1 GB, FAT16) a file boot.log.txt is created that contains the message "insmod: cannot insert '/root/abook/reloaded.ko': invalid module format (-1): Exec format error".
Do I make a mistake?

Well, the mistake of thinking your BeBook One 2010 is supported by OI

The 2010 edition is a Hanlin V3+, not a standard V3. OI doesn't support it: http://openinkpot.org/wiki/Hardware

marisr · 06-21-2010, 08:15 AM

I mixed up v3+ with v3 ext.....

wap502 · 06-21-2010, 09:47 AM

when OI can support v3+

pholy · 06-21-2010, 10:42 AM

As far as I know, nobody has released the sources for a driver for the Epson chip yet, although both Hanlin and Netronix are making readers using the chip, and many companies are distributing them. Assuming the drivers are kernel-linked modules, I think they are all obligated to distribute the sources of their Linux sources.

So it may be quite a while. We're still waiting on the V5 sources, I think.

propylen · 06-25-2010, 02:07 PM

HI! Someone knows which Epson's chip is installed in V3+: S1D13522 or S1D13521? If S1D13521, is that driver for Linux?
http://cateee.net/lkddb/web-lkddb/FB_BROADSHEET.html

[OT] someone know how to dump dmesg on V3+? This doesn't work:
http://openinkpot.org/wiki/Device/V5/Firmware/Output

Thanks in advance.

DaleDe · 06-25-2010, 02:55 PM

The V5 example doesn't work on a V5 either. /mnt is not in the space available for the user to see.

propylen · 06-26-2010, 07:36 AM

DaleDe
I tried /home and /root/abook - nothing happens. Do you possibly know how user could run scripts on V3+?

DaleDe · 06-28-2010, 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by propylen

DaleDe
I tried /home and /root/abook - nothing happens. Do you possibly know how user could run scripts on V3+?

Sorry I don't have a 3+ but in general you use coolreader by adding an .fb2 extension to the end of a .exe extension. Linux uses the top line of the script to try and find a shell to run the script in and if found it runs it. Where the answer goes is a different issue.

Dale

propylen · 07-01-2010, 12:32 PM

OK, It works - lines need to not be CRLF terminated, EOL converted to UNIX wit notepad++ and now it works like charm. /mnt is SD card, /home is built in storage.

Ankh · 07-06-2010, 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pholy

As far as I know, nobody has released the sources for a driver for the Epson chip yet, although both Hanlin and Netronix are making readers using the chip, and many companies are distributing them. Assuming the drivers are kernel-linked modules, I think they are all obligated to distribute the sources of their Linux sources.

Not really. If it is not integrated into the Linux source tree, it does not qualify as a "derived work". That's a loophole in GPL that Nvidia and ATI are "exploiting" to release proprietary binary drivers. The only requirement is to tag module as proprietary, after which kernel will complain that it is tainted.

pholy · 07-06-2010, 11:19 AM

Ankh - Thank you, that is an interesting point. I'm not a license lawyer, so I can't comment on the validity of the loophole. On the other hand, speaking as a simple minded programmer, I could be tempted to say something like "I used a published API, I never looked at the (published) sources behind the API, so how am I obligated by the terms of the source license? It's just a module hooked in." So, maybe if it was a clean room implementation...

On the gripping hand, I really hate buying and using secret hardware, even though sometimes I have to - like my car and (many of) my wifi devices.

06-21-2010, 05:59 AM	#1
marisr Junior Member Posts: 2 Karma: 10 Join Date: Jun 2010 Device: Bebook one 2010	OI-on-SD live rel 0.2 not working on BeBook One 2010 I'm using the original firmware V2.02NL.100430 on my Bebook One 2010. I try to install the OI-on-SD live version rel2.0 (oi-hanlin-v3all-live-0.2.zip). But when I start the file boot-OI-V3.exe.fb2 on my BeBook, a screen with a gear is shown shortly, and then it returns to the bookshelf page. On my SD card (1 GB, FAT16) a file boot.log.txt is created that contains the message "insmod: cannot insert '/root/abook/reloaded.ko': invalid module format (-1): Exec format error". Do I make a mistake?

06-25-2010, 02:07 PM	#6
propylen Junior Member Posts: 4 Karma: 10 Join Date: Jun 2010 Device: BeBook One 2010edition(Hanlin V3+ clone)	Noob questions HI! Someone knows which Epson's chip is installed in V3+: S1D13522 or S1D13521? If S1D13521, is that driver for Linux? http://cateee.net/lkddb/web-lkddb/FB_BROADSHEET.html [OT] someone know how to dump dmesg on V3+? This doesn't work: http://openinkpot.org/wiki/Device/V5/Firmware/Output Thanks in advance.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Meet-Up! LIVE Berichterstattung aus Nürnberg 26.6.2010	Marc_liest	Lounge	31	06-27-2010 11:34 AM
TOC not working on my BeBook	spaze	ePub	13	09-02-2009 01:53 AM
First video footage of BeBook 2 and BeBook mini	ebookreaders	News	20	05-23-2009 06:58 AM
Disastrous firmware upgrade for many BeBook users: no excuses from BeBook!!!	Diogene	BeBook	86	12-10-2008 10:02 AM

06-21-2010, 08:15 AM	#3
marisr Junior Member Posts: 2 Karma: 10 Join Date: Jun 2010 Device: Bebook one 2010	I mixed up v3+ with v3 ext.....

06-21-2010, 09:47 AM	#4
wap502 Member Posts: 16 Karma: 12 Join Date: Jun 2010 Device: v3+	when OI can support v3+

06-21-2010, 10:42 AM	#5
pholy Booklegger Posts: 1,801 Karma: 7999816 Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Device: BeBook(1 & 2010), PEZ, PRS-505, Kobo BT, PRS-T1, Playbook, Kobo Touch	As far as I know, nobody has released the sources for a driver for the Epson chip yet, although both Hanlin and Netronix are making readers using the chip, and many companies are distributing them. Assuming the drivers are kernel-linked modules, I think they are all obligated to distribute the sources of their Linux sources. So it may be quite a while. We're still waiting on the V5 sources, I think.

06-25-2010, 02:55 PM	#7
DaleDe Grand Sorcerer Posts: 11,470 Karma: 13095790 Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Grass Valley, CA Device: EB 1150, EZ Reader, Literati, iPad 2 & Air 2, iPhone 7	The V5 example doesn't work on a V5 either. /mnt is not in the space available for the user to see.

06-26-2010, 07:36 AM	#8
propylen Junior Member Posts: 4 Karma: 10 Join Date: Jun 2010 Device: BeBook One 2010edition(Hanlin V3+ clone)	DaleDe I tried /home and /root/abook - nothing happens. Do you possibly know how user could run scripts on V3+?

07-01-2010, 12:32 PM	#10
propylen Junior Member Posts: 4 Karma: 10 Join Date: Jun 2010 Device: BeBook One 2010edition(Hanlin V3+ clone)	OK, It works - lines need to not be CRLF terminated, EOL converted to UNIX wit notepad++ and now it works like charm. /mnt is SD card, /home is built in storage.

07-06-2010, 11:19 AM	#12
pholy Booklegger Posts: 1,801 Karma: 7999816 Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Device: BeBook(1 & 2010), PEZ, PRS-505, Kobo BT, PRS-T1, Playbook, Kobo Touch	Ankh - Thank you, that is an interesting point. I'm not a license lawyer, so I can't comment on the validity of the loophole. On the other hand, speaking as a simple minded programmer, I could be tempted to say something like "I used a published API, I never looked at the (published) sources behind the API, so how am I obligated by the terms of the source license? It's just a module hooked in." So, maybe if it was a clean room implementation... On the gripping hand, I really hate buying and using secret hardware, even though sometimes I have to - like my car and (many of) my wifi devices.

Advert

Advert