03-15-2009, 02:37 PM | #391 | |
Holy S**T!!!
Posts: 5,213
Karma: 108401
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Diego, California!!
Device: Kindle and iPad
|
Quote:
However, the letter came from Amazon's attorneys, and it should be the attorney's job to find out if the accusation has any basis in fact before they issue a take-down letter. The mistake (on the part of both Amazon and their attorneys) was in assuming that the scripts in question had been (1) created by the owerns and operators of MobileRead, and were being (2) distributed by the owners and operators of MobleRead. In an effort to boot-strap some support for their mistaken belief, they pointed to materials as obscure and someone saying "sure I have kindlepid.py and I'll send it to you via PM." That sort of post is not MobileRead.com "creating and distributing" materials, whether or not those materials are designed to circumvent DRM. Further, discussion of such tools, even discussion of how to use those tools, is protected speech in the United States. Of course MobileRead is going to be at the top of any Google search if you type in "kindlepid.py" .... a lot of people discuss that topic in this forum. I, for one, hope we keep on discussing it. However, I also hope that someone with a little bit of brain matter at Amazon begins to understand that: (1) the various DRM cracks that exist were not created by Alex Turcic or the moderators of MobileRead; (2) these cracks have been in existence for well over a year and are in wide distribution throughout the internet; (3) slapping a take-down letter on MobileRead is going to only create more discussion of scripts like this and whether or not they actually do anything except inconvenience the consumer; (4) and more discussion means that more people will find out the scripts exist, and are going to decide that, if the only way they can get the content they actually want on the device they own is to hire the 10 year old script whiz who lives next door to show them how to download and use these things; (5) and they will have served only to alienate their customer base. |
|
03-15-2009, 02:45 PM | #392 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
|
Quote:
I do not think a password recover program is a DRM circumvention tool. |
|
Advert | |
|
03-15-2009, 02:52 PM | #393 | |
Addict
Posts: 325
Karma: 1725
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Münster, Germany
Device: iRex iLiad v2
|
Quote:
I would second an open letter by the community, and if I read things correctly someone already set up something like that?! But IMO they won't really change things after reading such a letter. You have to "speak with your wallet" if you really want to drag attention to your issues. Again, this is only my personal opinion. |
|
03-15-2009, 03:09 PM | #394 | |
I'm Super Kindle-icious
Posts: 6,734
Karma: 2434103
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Long Drive, Calinadia Candafornia
Device: KDXG, KT, Oasis
|
Quote:
Check the link in my sig. |
|
03-15-2009, 03:41 PM | #395 | |
sleepless reader
Posts: 4,763
Karma: 615547
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany, near Stuttgart
Device: Sony PRS-505, PB 360° & 302, nook wi-fi, Kindle 3
|
Quote:
Your personal decision to stop any business with Amazon is fine. Basically (and personally) i do agree with you. But as community we should try to talk to Amazon first and give them time to react on our protest. Boycotting and/or even bashing them under the flag of MR seems to be the wrong way if we want MR to keep a good relationship to Amazon. You earned a lot of respect by me for the "rectification" of your first post. |
|
Advert | |
|
03-15-2009, 03:59 PM | #396 | |
Retired & reading more!
Posts: 2,764
Karma: 1884247
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North Alabama, USA
Device: Kindle 1, iPad Air 2, iPhone 6S+, Kobo Aura One
|
Quote:
1) PID is not necessarily or in general restricted to the Kindle. The PID of any device that has Mobipocket Reader legally and properly installed will provide that PID to the owner. The Kindle does not. The script mobidedrm.py was not even written with the Kindle in mind. It was only an after thought to even search for a possible PID on the Kindle since the .AZW files were nearly identical to .PRC files. 2) I don't believe anyone here is so naive as to believe "that a kindle’s PID is only use is for shopping at other stores" and in fact it doesn't matter. Your computer is part of a chain of tools that can be used to circumvent DRM. (In fact I believe it would be nearly impossible to do so without a computer.) Should Amazon have the right to take away your computer for this reason. We think not, nor do they have the moral right to take away a tool which does have a legitimate use such as kindlePID.py. 3)(Just my opinion.) Personally I believe it is morally wrong for any company to "give" me something as Amazon "gave" me my Kindles PID and then to say, "Oh but you can't use that. And in fact you can't even look at it." That makes as much sense to me as a law that says I can be naked in public but you can look at me and if you do, you're a criminal as subject to jail and/or fines. There are too many such laws now because the large companies would rather send their money to Washington, DC via lobbyists and make laws rather than making the appropriate engineering changes. Othe examplse are cable & satellite TV & radio. They send me the signal (encrypted) and say, "Mustn't touch or Big Brother slap your hand." If they don't waqnt me to have it, I say don't beam it at me. (End of rant.) Oh and another thing. Amazon's lawyer's are so tgorough and brillient that they required MR to remove all their "anti-circumvention" utilities. They either made a dumb mistake in language which I doubt because lawyers are typicall extremely efficient and correct with words, or they don't understand that the "anti-circumvention" laws are to prefent utilities that "circumvent" DRM not "anti-circumvention" tools. The latter seems more probable to me. Last edited by slayda; 03-15-2009 at 04:05 PM. |
|
03-15-2009, 04:14 PM | #397 | |
Wizard
Posts: 3,450
Karma: 10484861
Join Date: May 2006
Device: PocketBook 360, before it was Sony Reader, cassiopeia A-20
|
Quote:
Moderators here are so *keen* on keeping Mobileread "clean" and without any reference to piracy or "darknet" that, sometimes, it looks almost ridiculous. When I joined the forum and started to answer newbie questions about "where to get books" several of my posts got deleted/moderated because I dared to mention that there are people that [self censored word] books. Mind you, I was not posting any how-tos, I was not posting addresses of questionable sites, or names of IRC channels, I was not encouraging copyright infringement. I have simply dared to mention that the emperor has no clothes. References to files, books, sites, that are not *strictly* "legal" are quickly deleted on this forum. Some moderators here have many times expressed very strong feelings against anybody who is committing copyright infringement, calling people CRIMINALS. Now the Mobileread receives a legal threat because it linked to the site that linked to the site containing a script. And the script even can not be called a "circumvention tool". If Amazon tried to contact moderators, or site owners and ask nicely, everything would have been resolved very quickly and quietly. Imagine a situation: You have just purchased new furniture. Your neighbor John is parking his car in such a way that the [big] truck with the furniture can not get to your driveway. He is not blocking it, and if you tried to park your [relatively small] car there there would be quite a lot of space. What do you do now? 1. You knock on his door and ask nicely: "Hi John. Could you please move your car a little bit please?" 2. You call towing service or police (depending on where you live) and you have his car towed away. 3. You go home, load your legally held gun and start shooting at his car (or a that little bit of his car that is actually standing on your property) Which action would give the best and fastest result? Yes you CAN do 2. and (In some countries I shall not name here) you might get away with 3. but ... To sum it out: The moderators here are annoyed, because the Amazon started to attack us instead of contacting us and asking nicely. Mobileread moderators try very hard to keep the site in compliance with law, regulations, (even with crazy DMCA), they educate people here how to get books legally, they try to support the e-publishing industry and the industry sets blood-hound^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hlawyers on our trail. |
|
03-15-2009, 05:12 PM | #398 | |
Literacy = Understanding
Posts: 4,833
Karma: 59674358
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The World of Books
Device: Nook, Nook Tablet
|
Quote:
|
|
03-15-2009, 05:30 PM | #399 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,470
Karma: 13095790
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Grass Valley, CA
Device: EB 1150, EZ Reader, Literati, iPad 2 & Air 2, iPhone 7
|
Quote:
Dale |
|
03-15-2009, 05:35 PM | #400 | |
Wizard
Posts: 4,332
Karma: 4000000
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Paris
Device: Cybooks; Sony PRS-T1
|
Quote:
Then the APRIL (free software foundation), had some yell, that ended up in adding "except for interoperability reasons" Yeah, reading DVD with linux is legal again And well, getting rid of the drm on my E-books is for interoperability too. So it's not a mess when i gets a new pc or reader. Worse part is that this kind of thing never prevent people to crack things if they want to.It's just a pain to the customers. Music industry is begining to understand that, they're going no drm, slowly, but surely. What's the book industry's waiting for ? |
|
03-15-2009, 05:36 PM | #401 | |
Wizard
Posts: 4,332
Karma: 4000000
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Paris
Device: Cybooks; Sony PRS-T1
|
Quote:
Then the APRIL (free software foundation), had some yell, that ended up in adding "except for interoperability reasons" Yeah, reading DVD with linux is legal again And well, getting rid of the drm on my E-books is for interoperability too. So it's not a mess when i gets a new pc or reader. Worse part is that this kind of thing never prevent people to crack things if they want to.It's just a pain to the customers. Music industry is begining to understand that, they're going no drm, slowly, but surely. What's the book industry waiting for ? |
|
03-15-2009, 07:38 PM | #402 | |
Uebermensch
Posts: 2,583
Karma: 1094606
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Italy
Device: Kindle
|
Alright, remember the AACS encryption key controversy? Wikipedia has a summary. AACS LA issued demand letters to websites publishing a hexadecimal number used to decrypt DVD movies. It caused a huge uproad (on Digg in particular), when the AACS site posted the following in response:
Quote:
Today the hex number is freely available everywhere, including cited Wikipedia article. Not that we're talking about a circumvention tool here, kindlepid isn't, but I wish companies would take a lesson from history. |
|
03-15-2009, 08:03 PM | #403 | |
King of the Bongo Drums
Posts: 1,622
Karma: 5927225
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Excelsior! (Strange...)
|
Quote:
When you have the Congress extending copyright laws to protect the Disney Company's copyrights for 70 years, it's hard to sustain any belief that the same Congress really gives a damn about the rest of us. The DRM regime, insofar as I have experienced it, reminds me very much of the way that liquor distributors here in Illinois have managed to maintain an outmoded and inefficient system of liquor distribution, concentrated in the hands of a few businesses, by preventing Illinois residents from being able to buy wine from out of state, over the internet. The purpose is to enrich the distributors by requiring everyone to do business with them, if they want to buy a bottle of wine. I mean, look at this - the logical result of this DRM law is that I have to be prepared, as a reader, to purchase a dedicated ereader for each business which sells ebooks, if the sellers all decide that they want to so limit the use of what they sell. And further, there seems to be no reason why these sellers can't prevent me from uploading public domain texts, if they want to. That's like telling me that if I want to buy gas at BP, I have to use it in a Ford, while if I want to buy gas at Shell, I have to use it in a Honda. And if I understand the business relationships involved with Amazon & the mobi format, it's as if Exxon is saying that if I want to buy gas at an Exxon station, I have to use it in a Saab, but if I want to buy gas at Mobile, I have to use it in a Toyota, and this even though the same company owns each brand of gas. It's not merely that the system is stupid. It is that it is deliberately designed to insure that the end user has to live with whatever the sellers want to do. That's not law. That's a system of economic thievery disguised as law. |
|
03-15-2009, 08:23 PM | #404 | |
sleepless reader
Posts: 4,763
Karma: 615547
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany, near Stuttgart
Device: Sony PRS-505, PB 360° & 302, nook wi-fi, Kindle 3
|
Quote:
|
|
03-15-2009, 08:25 PM | #405 | |
Connoisseur
Posts: 94
Karma: 544
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle WA
Device: Kindle 1.0
|
Quote:
Companies are supposed to eliminate competition, that's their job right? At some point our legislation needs to step in and squash it. Instead it seems, more and more, they're in the pockets of the big companies. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any way to buy books from Amazon.com ? | Anonymouslemming | General Discussions | 27 | 09-02-2010 05:59 AM |
Info Amazon collects about books I didn't buy from them? | rangepig | Amazon Kindle | 1 | 08-26-2010 01:17 AM |
google : Amazon DMCA Kindle MobileRead | 37lIUx7Yx4Y | Amazon Kindle | 5 | 03-14-2009 11:30 PM |