![]() |
#16 |
Groupie
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 157
Karma: 474196
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ottawa
Device: Kobo Aura H2O
|
I'm thinking along the lines of DiapDealer. Of course the choice is yours to consider it a bug or not, but closing the second instance shouldn't really affect any settings, should it? This seems somewhat related to the change you made when cancelling a close - like, the code to not close F&R is triggered by cancelling the close rather than just having F&R closing not happen in the first place.
In any case, it's a nuisance for me, but if you consider it expected behaviour for whatever reason I'll deal. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Sigil Developer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 8,291
Karma: 5568878
Join Date: Nov 2009
Device: many
|
On Close the state of F&R is remembered in settings and F&R is closed before the state is saved.
This was done to prevent the long standing restore bug where Sigil would not restore its geometry properly once F&R was open. So as I said, expected behaviour. Last edited by KevinH; 02-06-2025 at 07:31 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 28,159
Karma: 201666666
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
Ah. Gotcha. I wasn't clear on the specifics.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sigil-2.0.2 Released | DiapDealer | Sigil | 39 | 02-13-2024 05:36 PM |
Sigil-0.9.11 Released | DiapDealer | Sigil | 37 | 02-18-2019 07:56 PM |
Sigil-0.8.900 released for testing - Wait for Sigil-0.8.901 | KevinH | Sigil | 106 | 10-04-2015 11:41 AM |
Sigil 0.8.5 Released | user_none | Sigil | 12 | 03-30-2015 12:28 PM |
Sigil 0.7.1 Released | user_none | Sigil | 64 | 03-26-2013 11:02 PM |