10-06-2011, 12:15 PM | #16 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,256
Karma: 35000000
Join Date: Jan 2008
Device: Pocketbook
|
Quote:
Frankly, given the lawyer in the US, I'm surprised it took this long for the suits.... |
|
10-06-2011, 12:18 PM | #17 | |
Fanatic
Posts: 532
Karma: 3293888
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Virginia
Device: Nook Simple Touch
|
Quote:
|
|
Advert | |
|
10-06-2011, 12:20 PM | #18 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
Correct.
Competition is legally deemed good and collusion and conspiracy, concerted action to benefit a group of companies to the detriment of consumers and/or other competitors is legally deemed bad. Some of the laws and precedents go back a century and more. Note that the suits in question are civil suits; the various state AGs and the feds have yet to act on the criminal front. Among the many dangers facing the pricefixers is that the civil discovery process could uncover evidence that greases action on the criminal front, where penalties could theoretically get very personal. If the term RICO comes into play things could get very interesting very fast. But so far all that is at risk is shareholder value so the pricefixers aee not personally liable. Yet. |
10-06-2011, 12:24 PM | #19 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
So it would not be an offence for one publisher to say to Amazon, "I'm only going to let you sell my books if you agree to act as an agent, rather than a retailer", right? It's the fact that that five publishers did so jointly?
|
10-06-2011, 12:29 PM | #20 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 19,226
Karma: 67780237
Join Date: Jul 2011
Device: none
|
Quote:
I think the publishers need to realize that many people buy most of my books in e-format now (I did personally get a few paper ones when I got a gift card recently) and I haven't bought an e-book since August 23rd now. Most of the books I'm looking at have fallen under the evil umbrella and are all $10. Which is too much when I can cruise the bargains of physical books and find reasonable options for $5. Now I've started to use the library like a demon again. My comment to the publishers is: if you don't want to sell books, that's your choice. |
|
Advert | |
|
10-06-2011, 12:35 PM | #21 | |
Omnivorous
Posts: 3,281
Karma: 27978909
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rural NW Oregon
Device: Kindle Voyage, Kindle Fire HD, Kindle 3, KPW1
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rackete...anizations_Act |
|
10-06-2011, 12:38 PM | #22 | |
Grand Master of Flowers
Posts: 2,201
Karma: 8389072
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Naptown
Device: Kindle PW, Kindle 3 (aka Keyboard), iPhone, iPad 3 (not for reading)
|
Quote:
The real issue is that the agency pricing agreements with the publishers and the retailers prohibit the publisher from charging one retailer less than another. I.e., Amazon is acting as an agent for HC, but HC is prohibited from selling its books through B&N for less than it does through Amazon. This is an agreement between competitors wrt prices and looks a lot like classic price fixing. The agency model doesn't. |
|
10-06-2011, 12:40 PM | #23 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
That is Amazon's public position and likely would be their in-court position, but the case can be made that the price fix benefits them by increasing their BPH content margins, allowing them (as well as Kobo and B&N) to prosper by applying that added revenue to expand in other areas. There's no telling how compelling such a case might be in court, but it *can* be made and, as I pointed out above, in today's anti-business, class-warfare populist climate every succesful company is guilty until proven innocent and often not even then.
|
10-06-2011, 01:15 PM | #24 | ||
IOC Chief Archivist
Posts: 3,950
Karma: 53868218
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Fruitland Park, FL, USA
Device: Meebook M7, Paperwhite 2021, Fire HD 8+, Fire HD 10+, Lenovo Tab P12
|
Quote:
Quote:
There is a distinction between being in cahoots with price fixing, and making decisions in the best interest of a company. All it would take is evidence of threats of, or even allusions to, publishers pulling their content from Amazon to paint Amazon as a company under duress to comply for the sake of remaining competitive, rather than a company in collusion with the publishers. Any case that Amazon was complicit would almost have to hinge on the fact that Amazon is so huge that its actions made it possible for the scheme to succeed, and that gains made my doing so were greater than losses that would have occurred otherwise. Now, if the discovery process brings to light evidence that Amazon was an active or even cooperating party to the collusion, all of this goes out the window. |
||
10-06-2011, 01:19 PM | #25 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,256
Karma: 35000000
Join Date: Jan 2008
Device: Pocketbook
|
|
10-06-2011, 02:12 PM | #26 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
Quote:
Agreed on both counts. The coertion aspect is where the racketeering exposure could come in, btw. Extortion and/or bribery are RICO-enablers. (Random House was the last to join the cabal in the US but they were in on the discussions from day one and they joined in soon enough.) |
|
10-06-2011, 02:38 PM | #27 | |
Grand Master of Flowers
Posts: 2,201
Karma: 8389072
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Naptown
Device: Kindle PW, Kindle 3 (aka Keyboard), iPhone, iPad 3 (not for reading)
|
Quote:
|
|
10-06-2011, 03:07 PM | #28 |
Literacy = Understanding
Posts: 4,833
Karma: 59674358
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The World of Books
Device: Nook, Nook Tablet
|
Yes, Harry, that is correct. It is also not a problem if the 5 acted wholly independent of each other. The fact that it occurred simultaneoulsy is circumstantial evidence of collusion, but not conclusive proof. It is sufficient proof in a civil suit if the defendants do not counter it. The question really boils down to "what other inference could a reasonable person draw?"
|
10-06-2011, 03:07 PM | #29 | |
PHD in Horribleness
Posts: 2,320
Karma: 23599604
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: In the ironbound section, near avenue L
Device: Just a whole bunch. I guess I am a collector now.
|
Quote:
|
|
10-06-2011, 03:15 PM | #30 |
Is that a sandwich?
Posts: 8,189
Karma: 100500000
Join Date: Jun 2010
Device: Nook Glowlight Plus
|
If the courts decided agency pricing must end, what stops the publishers from raising their wholesale prices or delaying ebook availability?
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Smashwords Moves to Agency Model | NightBird | News | 115 | 12-10-2010 11:09 AM |
Agency model, Apple and Amazon in the UK | Ben Thornton | News | 24 | 08-19-2010 05:05 AM |
HarperCollins -- or my adventures in the new agency model | Storm27 | General Discussions | 19 | 04-16-2010 09:06 AM |
Now that they've been able to push the agency model on e-books.. | Boston | General Discussions | 16 | 04-06-2010 08:15 PM |
Question about agency pricing model | phenomshel | General Discussions | 0 | 03-27-2010 01:49 PM |