11-22-2008, 10:34 AM | #46 |
book creator
Posts: 9,635
Karma: 3856660
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Luxembourg
Device: PB360°
|
While I second the first definition, the second is just hogwash, to put it mildly.. SF can very well exist without the "technical" part (cf MZB's Dragonrider books) and thrives without the second part (cf 1984 f. ex)
Last edited by mtravellerh; 11-22-2008 at 10:38 AM. |
11-22-2008, 04:04 PM | #47 |
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Karma: 10
Join Date: Nov 2008
Device: PRS-505
|
Charles Sheffield's The McAndrew Chronicles
The best hard science fiction book I have read ever is "The McAndrew Chronicles" by Charles Sheffield.
You will love it! Regards. |
Advert | |
|
11-22-2008, 04:40 PM | #48 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
I just recently caught the classic cold war film Ice Station Zebra on TV. Although it would be labeled "cold war drama" or "spy thriller" in most catalogs, the story revolves around a super-sophisticated camera and highly detailed film, capable of reading "the text on a pack of cigarettes from 300 miles up" (quoted from the film). If that doesn't qualify as science fiction, even today, I don't know what does.
The label "science fiction" is frustrating because it actually says so little about the content... imagine defining Hamlet, A Tale of Two Cities and The Three Musketeers as "historic fiction." Would you therefore imagine each story is essentially like the others? Unfortunately, the SF label has become so commonplace, and as authors and readers are forced to use it, stories get unwittingly pigeonholed by it. But it says so little about the content. All of my books, save one, are SF... but are they all the same kind of story? Hardly. I'd much rather define books as adventure, drama, romance, comedy, mystery, etc... then add a tag like "science," "futuristic," "technological," etc, to it... so Jurassic Park becomes "science adventure," for instance, Star Trek becomes "futuristic adventure," and Solaris becomes "science drama." Tags like that would be much more useful and descriptive than the catch-all "science fiction." |
11-22-2008, 05:10 PM | #49 |
Enthusiast
Posts: 31
Karma: 376
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pacific NorthWest
Device: Kobo H20, Nook Glowlight 3
|
The simplest approach is to work through the Free Library at Baen.
However, taking a quick look at my wall of books C J Cherryh - Heavy Time and related books, Chanur's Venture series, Foreigner series Much of her writing is slow going but I think she is one of the best writers for portaying alien mindsets. Haven't look to see if any are available in ebook form Sharon Lee and Steve Miller - Agent of Chaos and related books Lighter reading - available from Baen in most formats L E Modessit - He has a number of fairly hard SF books as well as various fantasy series. Try Flash, Adiamante and the Ecolitan series James Schmitz - see what you can find at Baen. It is somewhat dated but nevertheless well written and worth reading. |
11-22-2008, 05:46 PM | #50 | |
Guru
Posts: 618
Karma: 493394
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Device: iRex iLiad, Onyx Boox 60
|
Quote:
Certainly some people feel that it should be that way, but not all. |
|
Advert | |
|
11-22-2008, 06:03 PM | #51 |
Guru
Posts: 618
Karma: 493394
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Device: iRex iLiad, Onyx Boox 60
|
|
11-22-2008, 09:09 PM | #52 |
eReader
Posts: 2,750
Karma: 4968470
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: Note 5; PW3; Nook HD+; ChuWi Hi12; iPad
|
Edward Lerner writes hard SF, and has stuff available at both Baen and Fictionwise.
|
11-22-2008, 10:54 PM | #53 |
Zealot
Posts: 130
Karma: 96
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: metro Atlanta, GA
Device: Sony Reader PRS-505
|
I realized I had forgotten about Sherry S. Tepper - "A Plague of Angels" - but the only digital book of hers I can find is "Margaret".
|
11-23-2008, 01:12 PM | #54 |
Enthusiast
Posts: 35
Karma: 154
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: upstate NY
Device: PRS500
|
Try as I might, I just can't figure out whether any of Ian McDonald's books are available in e-editions. I do think his work would qualify as "hard" SF, but the atmosphere gets so dreamy, it does read more like fantasy sometimes.
Looking it up, I see they'll be re-issuing my favorite, Desolation Road, at the end of July 2009 in paper, for what it's worth. Also, HardSF-wise, I'd recommend just about anything by Bruce Sterling (e.g., A Good Old-Fashioned Future), including The Difference Engine, which is probably disqualified on technical grounds. |
11-23-2008, 01:37 PM | #55 | |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Quote:
<sigh> More expense... |
|
11-23-2008, 02:10 PM | #56 |
book creator
Posts: 9,635
Karma: 3856660
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Luxembourg
Device: PB360°
|
|
11-23-2008, 05:30 PM | #57 |
Enthusiast
Posts: 31
Karma: 376
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pacific NorthWest
Device: Kobo H20, Nook Glowlight 3
|
Continuing my earlier post,
Thinking about it some more, these are my definitions. Hard SF is stories where you you buy into the authors extrapolation/explanations. Soft SF is where you the science is relevant but not crtitcal. Fantasy is where you can't buy into it. The last point turns a lot of what some people call hard sf into bad fantasy, as far as I am concerned. A good(?) example would be Von Neumans War. My problem being the speed of growth of the machines and the energy source needed to drive the machines. Note that I feel that this is a symptom of all fiction involving nanotechnology. Anyway, using these definitions pushes most of my recommendations to the border between hard and soft with the Liaden universe (Sharon Lee and Steve Miller) very much on the soft side. And I would put Heinlein on the soft side too, so this is not a condemnation. |
11-24-2008, 07:40 AM | #58 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,451
Karma: 1550000
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maryland, USA
Device: Nook Simple Touch, HPC Evo 4G LTE
|
Quote:
-- Bill |
|
11-24-2008, 07:00 PM | #59 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,230
Karma: 7145404
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southern California
Device: Kindle Voyage & iPhone 7+
|
Interesting diversion into the meaning of "hard" here. Like art, 'I know it when I read it.' But I think it the author has to either not violate known science (at the time of the writing) or otherwise give a cogent explanation of why and how the known science gets violated.
I agree that if you could take a particular SF story and transpose it into fantasy, historical, or other genres then it didn't pass the test. To me the "hardness" of SF is integral to the plot. My most recent favorite example author? Richard K. Morgan (Altered Carbon, Broken Angels, Woken Furies, Thirteen... haven't read Market Forces yet). Cyberpunk is a sub-genre of hard SF, right? |
11-25-2008, 09:09 AM | #60 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
Not necessarily. Cyberpunk is based on a particular set of dystopic SF settings combined with highly-advanced technology--a fairly fantastic scenario, when you think about it--and as much of it is based on so-far-unproven medical concepts (brain-computer interfaces and implants, cloning, genetic manipulation, cybernetic body parts, etc), it is really no more "hard" than any other form of SF.
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Historical Fiction Suggestions | jenieliser | Reading Recommendations | 75 | 05-11-2018 10:33 AM |
Hard Science Fiction Recommendations | tmclough | Reading Recommendations | 237 | 11-24-2013 11:46 PM |
Historical Fiction to Science Fiction/Fantasy | Georgiegirl2012 | Reading Recommendations | 12 | 11-13-2010 07:22 PM |
Seriously thoughtful When science fiction meets science fact | pilotbob | Lounge | 51 | 04-25-2009 03:30 PM |
Soft on the Science - Science Fiction | Domokos | Reading Recommendations | 0 | 01-29-2006 09:18 PM |