09-25-2009, 10:40 AM | #1 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,409
Karma: 4132096
Join Date: Sep 2008
Device: Kindle Paperwhite/iOS Kindle App
|
Interesting copyright question
I was reading something in Wikipedia the other day about the wife of former US president Ulysses S. Grant. Apparently, she died in 1902 but her personal memoirs were not discovered and published until 1975. So how would copyright on such a work operate? If you go 'life of the author plus x years' then it would be public domain almost from the moment of publication---1975 was already past life plus 50, and now we're well over life plus 100 years. But it was not published until 1975. So does the 'copyright clock' start there? If so, are there separate rules for this kind of situation to prevent the works from being tied up for centuries after the author is already deceased?
|
09-25-2009, 10:46 AM | #2 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
For works published posthumously between 1922 and 1978 in the USA, the copyright term is 95 years from the date of publication.
|
Advert | |
|
09-25-2009, 11:04 AM | #3 |
Enthusiast
Posts: 34
Karma: 84
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Orlando FL
Device: Kindle 2
|
life of author+70, or 95 years from publication, whichever is sooner. since life of author+70 occurred before it was published, there wouldn't be an active copyright.
|
09-25-2009, 11:15 AM | #4 |
frumious Bandersnatch
Posts: 7,516
Karma: 18512745
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spaniard in Sweden
Device: Cybook Orizon, Kobo Aura
|
I asked the same here. It looks far from easy
If the publication + 50 years applies in the UK and EU, that gives 2025. If what I wrote in post #17 in that thread is valid in Canada, that gives 1980. |
09-25-2009, 11:18 AM | #5 | |
Guru
Posts: 753
Karma: 1496807
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Third World
Device: iLiad + PRS-505 + Kindle 3
|
Quote:
|
|
Advert | |
|
09-25-2009, 11:34 AM | #6 |
Wizard
Posts: 4,293
Karma: 529619
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
|
I have a similar rule of thumb:
Figure out what scenario is financially beneficial to a large corporation, and that's probably what copyright law says (since they're the ones that wrote it). |
09-25-2009, 12:07 PM | #7 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,549
Karma: 3799999
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: O'Fallon, Missouri, USA
Device: Nokia N800, PRS-505, Nook STR Glowlight, Kindle 3
|
That would be copyrights never expiring, and public domain doesn't exist at all.
|
09-25-2009, 03:04 PM | #8 |
Wizard
Posts: 4,293
Karma: 529619
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
|
|
09-25-2009, 03:15 PM | #9 |
Enthusiast
Posts: 34
Karma: 84
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Orlando FL
Device: Kindle 2
|
|
09-25-2009, 03:20 PM | #10 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,409
Karma: 4132096
Join Date: Sep 2008
Device: Kindle Paperwhite/iOS Kindle App
|
Okay, so how about this one?
(a) I discover, in my grandpa's basement, an old diary written by (let's say) my great-great grandfather, who has been long dead these last hundred years. I publish it. Copyrighted? I am guessing no. (b) Same scenario, but great-great grandpa was famous and I want to make money. So I publish, but muck up the whole thing with my own footnotes, commentary and introduction. Is the whole thing now under copyright? Or could someone theoretically edit out all the parts I added until only the parts written by great-great grandpa was left, and put that on Google Books, worry-free? |
09-25-2009, 03:27 PM | #11 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,790
Karma: 507333
Join Date: May 2009
Device: none
|
|
09-25-2009, 04:15 PM | #12 |
eReader
Posts: 2,750
Karma: 4968470
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: Note 5; PW3; Nook HD+; ChuWi Hi12; iPad
|
People are actually starting to challenge the current trend toward continuing copyright extension on constitutional grounds because regular extensions do make a mockery of the concept of limited terms and the public domain.
|
09-25-2009, 04:23 PM | #13 |
Wizard
Posts: 4,293
Karma: 529619
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
|
|
09-25-2009, 04:24 PM | #14 | |
Banned
Posts: 2,094
Karma: 2682
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: N/A
|
Quote:
And your (b) would attract a seperate term of copyright, if published later. |
|
09-25-2009, 04:25 PM | #15 | |
Sir Penguin of Edinburgh
Posts: 12,375
Karma: 23555235
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: DC Metro area
Device: Shake a stick plus 1
|
Quote:
There is a reason why unpublished works have a copyright if published posthumously, and that reason is to provide a financial incentive. Without it, would anyone put in the editing work needed to publish an old journal or collection of letters? |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Copyright question | Seabound | Upload Help | 9 | 01-23-2009 02:33 AM |
CopyRight Question | =X= | Upload Help | 45 | 05-01-2008 12:47 PM |
interesting NYT article on "copyright morality" | Liviu_5 | News | 389 | 03-15-2008 01:06 AM |
Interesting paper on copyright law vs reality | Nate the great | News | 9 | 11-20-2007 02:20 AM |
very interesting link about copyright in the digital age | Liviu_5 | News | 0 | 06-05-2006 10:45 AM |