08-08-2012, 07:07 AM | #46 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
So Samsung lawyers are now bringing in evidence for Apple?
So, it *is* true: Apple really has hired every last competent lawyer in the country! Way to stack the deck! |
08-08-2012, 07:43 AM | #47 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
Samsung watches Conan O'Brian!
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-57...amsung-guilty/ And I didn't even know he still had a show! |
08-08-2012, 09:24 AM | #48 | |
Banned
Posts: 1,118
Karma: 3111746
Join Date: Oct 2011
Device: Kindle & little green monster
|
Quote:
|
|
08-08-2012, 10:04 AM | #49 | |
Banned
Posts: 1,118
Karma: 3111746
Join Date: Oct 2011
Device: Kindle & little green monster
|
This makes sense.
Quote:
|
|
08-08-2012, 02:02 PM | #50 | |
Wizard
Posts: 2,743
Karma: 32912427
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Device: Kobo H20, Pixel 2, Samsung Chromebook Plus
|
Quote:
Hmm. Missed deadlines, yes, I know. Graham |
|
08-08-2012, 02:09 PM | #51 |
Groupie
Posts: 182
Karma: 1316076
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Florida
Device: iPad
|
^^ I'm not a lawyer, but I think Samsung "opened the door" that let that document be admitted.
|
08-08-2012, 02:24 PM | #52 | |
Interested Bystander
Posts: 3,725
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
|
Quote:
The Samsung document is a point-by-point, 132 page, direct comparison of the two actual phone models, listing 126 points in which the iPhone was superior. (In Samsung's view, not mine) It also includes the rather embarrassing phrase (in the English translation) "Strong impression that iPhone's icon concept was copied". |
|
08-08-2012, 03:23 PM | #53 |
Captain Penguin
Posts: 2,944
Karma: 2077653593
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Nook Glowlight
|
All companies benchmark their devices against the competition. When I worked for a mobile phone company, we had phones from pretty much every other competitor to see how we fared against them, and used that as a way to improve our devices. Nothing to see here, move along.
|
08-08-2012, 04:06 PM | #54 | |
Interested Bystander
Posts: 3,725
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
|
Quote:
Whatever the merits of the document in addressing the actual technical points of Apple's claims, this is a jury trial rather than a judge only one, and jury trials about winning the jury over. This document has to hurt Samsung in the jury's eyes. Apple can just point to each item in turn and say "Look, they saw what we did, and copied it". Last edited by murraypaul; 08-08-2012 at 04:09 PM. |
|
08-08-2012, 06:00 PM | #55 | |
Wizard
Posts: 2,743
Karma: 32912427
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Device: Kobo H20, Pixel 2, Samsung Chromebook Plus
|
Quote:
Graham |
|
08-08-2012, 06:38 PM | #56 |
Wizard
Posts: 3,117
Karma: 9269999
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: UK
Device: Sony- T3, PRS650, 350, T1/2/3, Paperwhite, Fire 8.9,Samsung Tab S 10.5
|
|
08-08-2012, 09:10 PM | #57 | |
Captain Penguin
Posts: 2,944
Karma: 2077653593
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Nook Glowlight
|
Quote:
|
|
08-09-2012, 09:13 AM | #58 | |
Interested Bystander
Posts: 3,725
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
|
Quote:
(Which you might conclude they did in order to prevent Apple having time to present counter-evidence) |
|
08-09-2012, 09:40 AM | #59 |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
Posts: 71,406
Karma: 305065800
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Voyage
|
Umm... no. Those documents didn't show that. They showed one of Apple's design team's ideas about how Sony might design the iPhone. No actual Sony products were used or referenced.
|
08-09-2012, 11:15 AM | #60 |
Groupie
Posts: 182
Karma: 1316076
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Florida
Device: iPad
|
Again, I'm not a lawyer, but I think appeals are usually limited to the evidence that was in the original trial. If you want to bring in new evidence, you need a new trial.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Samsung v. Apple | carpetmojo | News | 625 | 11-18-2012 11:07 AM |
Samsung didn't copy Apple, Apple says | afv011 | Android Devices | 5 | 07-19-2012 05:50 PM |
Apple vs Samsung US Ruling | JD Gumby | News | 14 | 06-30-2012 03:49 PM |
Patented computer software may replace human authors | Alexander Turcic | Lounge | 21 | 09-22-2009 11:22 AM |