03-18-2013, 05:39 AM | #121 | |
Not scared!
Posts: 13,424
Karma: 81011643
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Midlands, UK
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 10, Huawei M5 10
|
Quote:
You would seem to be suggesting that 'cheating' share holders is in some way worse than 'cheating' citizens of the country in which they operate? I would respectfully disagree with that viewpoint. |
|
03-18-2013, 05:44 AM | #122 |
Wizard
Posts: 4,538
Karma: 264065402
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Taiwan
Device: HP Touchpad, Sony Duo 13, Lumia 920, Kobo Aura HD
|
They are not cheating the UK, whatever you think of their methods they are legal. If not, then they why not go after them? It is up to the UK and EU to make them illegal. You cannot "demand" that companies voluntarily pay more than they legally have to and condemn them if they don't. I am not arguing that Amazon should not be forced to pay more taxes in the UK than they do now, but this is something that lawmakers must fix.
Last edited by HansTWN; 03-18-2013 at 05:49 AM. |
Advert | |
|
03-18-2013, 05:45 AM | #123 |
Not scared!
Posts: 13,424
Karma: 81011643
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Midlands, UK
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 10, Huawei M5 10
|
As I said - I disagree.
|
03-18-2013, 06:00 AM | #124 | |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
Posts: 71,412
Karma: 305065800
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Voyage
|
Quote:
(The figures I found said that in 2011 Amazon made sales in the UK of between $5.3bn and $7.2bn, but paid only $1m in UK income tax.) This is because the current EU laws allow them to register the profit from UK operations almost entirely in Luxembourg, where there's only an 11% tax rate on profits from foreign operations. The solution to this is to fix the EU tax laws. |
|
03-18-2013, 06:43 AM | #125 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
We've already had this discussion ad nausiam a few weeks ago. Do we really need to go through it all again?
|
Advert | |
|
03-18-2013, 06:51 AM | #126 |
Tea Enthusiast
Posts: 8,554
Karma: 75384937
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Somewhere in the USA
Device: Kindle1, Kindle DX Graphite, K3 3G, IPad 3, PW2
|
Apparently yes. Because the temp worker thing has been discussed more then once.
It is the same with Apple topics, Amazon is evil. They should pay more in taxes then they are legally required to. They should hire more people then they need and pay higher wages and provide amazing benefits and never send employees home due to lack of work. I get people don't like it but the answer is to fix the laws that allow these things and not to villanize a compnay that is, oh, following the law. Or at least owning up to the fact that you don't hold all other similar companies to the same standards. I understand that people don't like Amazon's labor policies and tax practices. I agree that Amazon's labor practices are shady but they are legal and the workers have a choice so it is hard for me to get too worked up at Amazon for it. I'll focus on those issues when I vote. |
03-18-2013, 09:22 PM | #127 | |
Fledgling Demagogue
Posts: 2,384
Karma: 31132263
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: White Plains
Device: Clara HD; Oasis 2; Aura HD; iPad Air; PRS-350; Galaxy S7.
|
Quote:
As should be obvious, no one is suggesting that Amazon maintain the same conditions in their warehouses as exist in a standard book store. My staggeringly obvious point was that supporting local book stores means supporting the people who work in them and therefore allowing those people to work under better conditions than exist in Amazon's warehouses. Supporting Amazon alone and telling local stores to go to hell means supporting the imposition of a Metropolis-ready work environment and the demise of better conditions in local stores. Here's where someone will likely raise the point I've already mentioned: That there aren't many book stores left. To which my answer was and is, bingo -- the slow death of local stores is precisely why I mentioned this. We're heading toward a model of commerce which disincludes them. That's why we should perhaps reexamine the supposition that warehouse-based booksellers are always better. Convenience and better pricing for the consumer do not come without other kinds of prices -- to the worker and to the local economy. |
|
03-18-2013, 10:09 PM | #128 |
Wizard
Posts: 3,144
Karma: 8426142
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Device: Kindle PW2, Kindle Voyage, Kindle DXG, Boox M90, Kobo Aura HD
|
Was it? I, too, must be woefully obtuse.
Last edited by pidgeon92; 03-18-2013 at 11:15 PM. |
03-18-2013, 10:18 PM | #129 |
Tea Enthusiast
Posts: 8,554
Karma: 75384937
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Somewhere in the USA
Device: Kindle1, Kindle DX Graphite, K3 3G, IPad 3, PW2
|
I see, so all the employees of Indie bookstores are fully employeed and receive benefits. Really? They all make a living wage?
Sure |
03-18-2013, 10:27 PM | #130 |
Wizard
Posts: 3,144
Karma: 8426142
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Device: Kindle PW2, Kindle Voyage, Kindle DXG, Boox M90, Kobo Aura HD
|
|
03-18-2013, 10:27 PM | #131 | |
Wizard
Posts: 4,538
Karma: 264065402
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Taiwan
Device: HP Touchpad, Sony Duo 13, Lumia 920, Kobo Aura HD
|
Quote:
Last edited by HansTWN; 03-18-2013 at 10:29 PM. |
|
03-19-2013, 06:59 AM | #132 | |
Tea Enthusiast
Posts: 8,554
Karma: 75384937
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Somewhere in the USA
Device: Kindle1, Kindle DX Graphite, K3 3G, IPad 3, PW2
|
Quote:
I don't buy for one second that the kid helping me at the Banana Repbulic or Babies R Us or Barnes and Noble are getting a living wage and benefits. Most of the people working at those stores are making an OK wage and not getting benefits. They are probably doing what I did, saving up for spending money for school or using it as pocket money. The part that bothers me is that there are people who are using those positions to try and make ends meet. They work two jobs selling books at Barnes and Nobles and pants at Banana Republic. They are making barely above minimum wage and they don't have benefits. I would guess that most of those folks are not unemployeed in a temporary position. Even in the crap economy people with college degrees tended to be in a good position with people taking jobs that pay less and not as great benefits and having to adjust life styles. Don't get me wrong, I know someone who lost a nearly 6 figure job and ended up working at Starbucks but that was a really weird situation and two years later he is back working at his old salary and benefits. The problem is not that Amazon and Walmart and Barnes and Noble hire a lot of part time employees, those jobs have always existed, but that the high number of people without high school degrees are working those jobs to try and make a living. Those jobs were never meant to be jobs to make a living, they are suppose to be part time jobs. There is the increase need for the Baby Boomers to find jobs because they did not, or could not, save enough for reitrement and are taking these temp jobs to help make ends meet. The US has failed to provide alternative educational programs for kids not interested in going to college. The focus on college prep is too great. I believe I read that close to half the population is not going to go to or finish college. We need to have educational options for them starting in high school so that they can learn a marketable trade that will provide a good salary and benefits. The US has failed to hammer home the need for private savings for returement. The pension system is dead and social security is not going to pay the bills. But people think that social security will cover them in retirement. For many people in the lower middle class and even in the middle class, they spend too much money on status items, vacations, and things that make them look like they are keeping up with the Jones's. They get to retirement and find the minimum amount that they put into their 401K and social security check are no where near enough to maintain their life style. The US does not train people to save. We are hit with spend , spend, spend messages. Why am I reading stories about families struggling to make ends met who are discussing how much they need their cell phones and the $80 a month they spend on the cell phone bill? Really? Since when has a cell phone become a must have item? Even if it is, why not use a buy a minutes plan and save on money. Only use the phone when necessary and save money. My hubby rarely spends more then $10 a month on his cell phone bill and I will probably move to a similar plan when my current contract ends. And we make a good amount of cash. So yeah, it would be nice for Amazon to hire all permenant employees, pay them $20 an hour and provide benefits. It would help. But until the population as a whole learns to live within their means and that the government is not going to be there to take care of them when they retire or are sick, we are screwed. |
|
03-19-2013, 10:50 AM | #133 | |
Cynical Old Curmudgeon
Posts: 1,085
Karma: 8495696
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Halifax, Canada
Device: Kobo Mini, Kobo Arc, HTC Desire C
|
Quote:
|
|
03-19-2013, 11:38 AM | #134 |
Tea Enthusiast
Posts: 8,554
Karma: 75384937
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Somewhere in the USA
Device: Kindle1, Kindle DX Graphite, K3 3G, IPad 3, PW2
|
If this trend started in the 80's, then society has had 30 years to adjust. If people have not adjusted, then the problem is not with the stores but with something else.
We all know that you cannot live off of a job at McDonalds or the local book store. Maybe you could when it was more common to have one parent working, one at home, and people were not rushng out to buy the latest and greatest big screen TV, car, video game system, video game, or McMansion. I would guess that it would be easier to live off of some of these jobs if people did not see a smart phone, cable, two cars, and brand name clothes as a neccessity. I grew up in a middle class neighborhood in the 70's and 80's. Most of the mothers stayed home with the kids. Every year we went on vacations that were pretty nice. I had friends who rarely went on vacation with their familes because their parents spent money on clothes and cars. My parents could afford to put me and my siblings through college without taking loans, most of my compatriots had to take student loans. The difference? My parents would not pay for us to have the coolest clothes and shoes and toys. They drove pretty practicle cars until they died. Yes, my Dad made a great living and they could afford all of that but they saved instead. We all benefited from that. Explaining that to use as teenagers would have been wasted but we get it now as adults. And yet today there are people receiving assistance who are using cell phones and dressed in designer duds. I read stories about 1/3 of a town being on food stamps and the family worried about paying an $80 cell phone bill. I would love to say that these are rare cases but I have a feeling that they are not. So yes, the change in who gets benefits and who does not from many years ago plays a role but so do individual choices. If you don't want to work at Walmart, stay in school or go back and get your GED. Go to the community college and get some training to get a better job. It is not easy but it is doable. Change how you live and live within your means. It is easy to blame corporations, they are large faceless entities. There are some who appear to do things rights, like COSTCO and Target, but there are more who follow the letter of the law. Lets not count on a business interested in profit to do the right thing. Let's focus on the social problems that put people at the mercy of those businesses. Maybe if more people recieve the training they need and can move into the existing positions with good pay and benefits, the demand for people to fill the current temp jobs will move them from temp jobs to full time positions because that is how businesses are going to attract good candidates. I guess my thought is simply this, we are not going to change business practices but we can change individual behavior. Why not empower the individual so that they don't need to worry about working at a warehouse run by Amazon. |
03-20-2013, 05:54 PM | #135 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
Okay, guys, check the comments here to appreciate what that monster Amazon warehouse (and its hundred or so siblings all over the planet) is for:
http://www.thepassivevoice.com/03/20...ined/#comments And why they need them: http://business.time.com/2013/03/18/...yone-imagined/ Quote:
That's what those warehouses are for, taking Prime Global. Bookstores? Those are practically collateral damage, accidental roadkill. The game those folks are playing is just breath-takingly big... Last edited by fjtorres; 03-20-2013 at 06:00 PM. |
|
Tags |
amazon, amazon uk, rugeley, work conditions |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Amazon unpacked" - the Rugeley warehouse | SteveEisenberg | General Discussions | 2 | 02-10-2013 11:36 AM |
Accessories amazon K3 lighted cover - $25 from amazon warehouse deals | timelysarcasm | Amazon Kindle | 10 | 10-14-2011 07:41 PM |
Inside Amazon's warehouse | SteveEisenberg | Amazon Kindle | 12 | 09-28-2011 12:12 PM |
Buying Kindle from Amazon Warehouse | Melissa1919 | Amazon Kindle | 10 | 07-08-2011 10:28 PM |
Amazon Improves Conditions for eBook Publishers | vadimled | News | 20 | 12-19-2010 09:16 AM |