02-21-2011, 04:36 PM | #1 |
Reader
Posts: 85
Karma: 6124
Join Date: Jul 2009
Device: PRS-505
|
To the courts, or under the radar?
I've been thinking about common practices and legal rulings and the like recently when it comes to modern digital stuff. Specifically when it comes to ebooks.
So this thought has crossed my mind. Suppose that you want to sell a digital book, or share it with someone, etc etc. Regardless of the technical limitations (DRM) would you prefer to be in a world where there were specific legal rulings about particular actions? Or would you prefer to "fly under the radar" and let the action remain ambiguous? The advantage of the prior, a court ruling, is that now the action is well protected in one direction or the other. With precedent there's less legal bullying or threats. The latter, is the opposite benefit. The claim of poor clarification or challenge means that you get ignored by the big guys and get to keep doing what you're doing. I'm not entirely sure that the publishing industry wants to see some of these questions ("Can you lend an eBook?", "Can you resell an eBook?") to wind up in a court because as much threat as it is to us, it is to them. If it doesn't go in their favor it's an additional threat to their industry, as well as a whole host of other problems with protecting IP in general. I kind of feel both ways on the issue, and I'm curious what you guys think. |
02-21-2011, 04:45 PM | #2 |
monkey on the fringe
Posts: 45,477
Karma: 158151390
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
|
I'd like to see lending opened up a bit more. One loan per book per forever is too severe. Maybe 3~5 loans per book instead?
|
02-21-2011, 04:50 PM | #3 |
Reader
Posts: 85
Karma: 6124
Join Date: Jul 2009
Device: PRS-505
|
Yes, but the question isn't really "What would you like to see legitimized" but rather "Do you want to risk it going to court in the first place?"
|
02-21-2011, 04:53 PM | #4 | |
Curmudgeon
Posts: 3,085
Karma: 722357
Join Date: Feb 2010
Device: PRS-505
|
Quote:
Either first sale rights apply, and an ebook can be treated like a pbook, or it's a rental, not a sale, and they should quit pretending otherwise. Better rental terms, though, do not a sale make. |
|
02-21-2011, 04:53 PM | #5 |
monkey on the fringe
Posts: 45,477
Karma: 158151390
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
|
Lending isn't a legitimate matter for the courts to begin with. Publishers have the right to place whatever restrictions they want on lending.
|
02-21-2011, 04:54 PM | #6 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,230
Karma: 7145404
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southern California
Device: Kindle Voyage & iPhone 7+
|
I don't want the ambiguity because that hampers effective group efforts that then draw attention to themselves (e.g. Napster). I want the mainstream benefits that come with clarification (e.g. Rhapsody or Pandora).
|
02-21-2011, 05:12 PM | #7 |
Guru
Posts: 973
Karma: 2458402
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St. Louis
Device: Kindle Keyboard, Nook HD+
|
I'm not sure how it could end up in court. E-books have followed the same path that computer software has for probably 30 years (ie, selling a license for the content, not the actual content).
|
02-21-2011, 05:40 PM | #8 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,105
Karma: 1025784
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: WiFi Kindle3
|
|
02-21-2011, 05:48 PM | #9 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,105
Karma: 1025784
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: WiFi Kindle3
|
I've mentioned that issue in other threads. Although, not specifically at issue, many times governments will not appeal a decision of a lower court on some matter of law. Without appellate precedent, the law remains in effect challenging others to ignore with risk of trial. An appellate decision might totally invalidate it. Leaving it vague benefits one side or maybe the other.
|
02-21-2011, 06:03 PM | #10 | |
monkey on the fringe
Posts: 45,477
Karma: 158151390
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
|
Quote:
All rights reserved. This book may not be copied or reproduced, in whole or in part, by any means, electronic, mechanical or otherwise without written permission from the publisher except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review. Seems quite clear to me. |
|
02-21-2011, 07:02 PM | #11 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,345
Karma: 52398889
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
Quote:
|
|
02-21-2011, 07:13 PM | #12 | |
monkey on the fringe
Posts: 45,477
Karma: 158151390
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
|
Quote:
If you want ebook lending, convince the publishers; and leave the courts out of it. |
|
02-21-2011, 07:34 PM | #13 | |
Reader
Posts: 85
Karma: 6124
Join Date: Jul 2009
Device: PRS-505
|
Quote:
I can only see them adopting it by force of the courts, and really what that means is that they wouldn't be able to pursue criminal or civil redress for the activity. (They'd still stick DRM on it and nail you with the DMCA) |
|
02-21-2011, 07:46 PM | #14 |
monkey on the fringe
Posts: 45,477
Karma: 158151390
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
|
|
02-21-2011, 07:52 PM | #15 |
Banned
Posts: 1,687
Karma: 4368191
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oregon
Device: Kindle3
|
To the front of the courthouse steps.
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A National Scan Center: A Public Works Project (O'Reilley Radar) | Nate the great | News | 1 | 01-01-2010 12:13 PM |