|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
12-11-2018, 11:03 AM | #1 | |
o saeclum infacetum
Posts: 20,233
Karma: 222235366
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: H2O, Aura One, PW5
|
January 2019 Discussion • The Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le Guin
The Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le Guin is the January selection for the New Leaf Book Club.
Quote:
Last edited by issybird; 01-15-2019 at 06:09 AM. |
|
01-15-2019, 06:11 AM | #2 |
o saeclum infacetum
Posts: 20,233
Karma: 222235366
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: H2O, Aura One, PW5
|
It's time to discuss The Left Hand of Darkness. What did we think of it?
|
01-15-2019, 08:05 AM | #3 |
cacoethes scribendi
Posts: 5,809
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
|
First let me say, this has to be one of my all time favourite book titles. I'm talking about the title itself: The Left Hand of Darkness. I'm not totally convinced it and the book go perfectly together (even though it's a quote from the book) but I still love that title.
Now to the book itself. It's been years since I last read it, and I think it has stood up quite well ... considering. The first half of this is a bit inconsistent in pace and presentation, and that makes it hard going in places - by today's standards, although I think the style was fairly typical in science fiction back when this was written. The further you get in the more involving and evocative it becomes. Overall I enjoyed it as a science fiction story with a strongly human aspect (and I much prefer this sort of thing over technical expositions, or space-opera and space-thriller type books). It is, now, an acknowledged classic, based - as I understand it - on its treatment of gender. But my reading of it is that the gender aspects were not originally intended to be of the strength since ascribed to them. Rather, like most science fiction, the entire story is a "what if" question of which gender is just one aspect. For example the developing relationship between Genly and Estraven is obviously central to the story, and this is about ambition, foresight, friendship, loyalty, betrayal and failure to understand one another; gender is in there behind all that, it is important to the story, but it's not the entire story. |
01-15-2019, 09:08 AM | #4 |
Nameless Being
|
My reaction somewhat mirrors gmw's. My overriding impression was of a really quite excellent piece of SF addressing the simple reality that aliens would be alien. Obviously, the author's choices about the nature of the differences had relevance to societal and gender issues here, but I did not feel like I was reading a treatise on human gender politics dressed up as SF. I found myself enjoying a work of anthropological SF, one that examined with detail and internal rigour and consistency the way the species' own nature and its environment shaped the culture. The grammatical and vocabulary notes reinforced for me the impression of a novel that was serious about world building and exploring difference.
In that context, Genly reminded me of Bren Cameron in Foreigner, an interpreter and analyser of difference. The closest I ever felt the author came to unsubtle moralising was when she touched on a sentiment close to my on heart, the difference between love of the physical environs of one's home and patriotism. Because the stated views meshed perfectly with mine, I enjoyed the passage greatly, but it was definitely blunt and not nuanced at all, unlike the androgyny/bisexuality that became the book's most famous feature. |
01-15-2019, 10:09 AM | #5 | ||
o saeclum infacetum
Posts: 20,233
Karma: 222235366
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: H2O, Aura One, PW5
|
It is indeed one of the great titles!
I'm going to start off by saying I'm glad to have read it. It's an important book and I was entertained overall. Yeah, there's a "but" implied there! It strikes me as very much a book of its time, an outgrowth of the burgeoning women's and race movements. I don't think it's aged well. The take on sex/gender/sexuality was determinative and explicitly a case of either/or, whether it be masculine/feminine or gendered/androgynous. It's heteronormative and what comes across as extremely biased in its attitudes toward women. I don't know enough about Le Guin to know whether that reflected her own attitudes or whether she was projecting her sense of what men think; I suspect that it's some of both. Aside from that, I thought the world-building was tedious; it was far too much tell and not show. Again, I suspect it reflects its time. I don't read sci-fi or fantasy much if at all, but my sense is that the best of the current authors rely on knowing their world thoroughly and conveying it indirectly and consistently. More of the onus is on the reader, a very good thing! Since I'm not grounded at all in classic sci-fi, I'm going to be interested to learn how this fits in with the literature. I know it was groundbreaking and it gets a pass for that. Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-15-2019, 10:18 AM | #6 | ||||
Professor of Law
Posts: 3,640
Karma: 65925980
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Device: Kobo Elipsa, Kobo Libra H20, Kobo Aura One, KoboMini
|
I had never read this before, so I did not come to it with any notions or nostalgia as I have seen others mention. I did not love it as much as many, but I also really enjoyed reading it in the context of our time (and hers, when it was written).
The introduction! There is nothing I did not love about this introduction! I was reminded so strongly of Joan Didion that I photocopied the introduction on my home copier and gave it to my wife (a writer) to read. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
01-15-2019, 10:22 AM | #7 | |
Professor of Law
Posts: 3,640
Karma: 65925980
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Device: Kobo Elipsa, Kobo Libra H20, Kobo Aura One, KoboMini
|
Quote:
And, of course, there were the passing references to us pesky gays as deviants, even in the non-gendered world of Winter. (Sorry for the double post!) |
|
01-15-2019, 10:46 AM | #8 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,345
Karma: 52398889
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
Sitting this one out. No audiobook at the library made this a nonstarter for me--I might have made an attempt to listen to something I'm predisposed to dislike, but trying to read it would make my eyes glaze over. The comments so far are reinforcing my decision; this is just not my bag.
|
01-15-2019, 11:03 AM | #9 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,638
Karma: 28483498
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ottawa Canada
Device: Sony PRS-T3, Galaxy (Aldiko, Kobo app)
|
Quote:
That's what makes the novel most interesting to me; the notion of a culture that isn't built on life assignment based on sexual reproduction. |
|
01-15-2019, 03:07 PM | #10 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,631
Karma: 73864785
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: PDXish
Device: Kindle Voyage, various Android devices
|
I'm in progress but I am way behind on any reading this year. Only one book completed this year and it was a short one.
My initial thoughts on the introduction, which was written in 1976 about 7 years after the book was published, is that it felt like she thought that her work needed defending and/or explaining. Despite winning both the Hugo and Nebula awards. Were current discussions of the book not hitting her expectations? Did people (do we) just not get what she was going for? Edit: Explaining isn't the right word. She didn't try to explain the book in the introduction (thankfully) but she was trying to explain why the book was written as it was and the tone was defensive. Last edited by Dazrin; 01-15-2019 at 03:13 PM. Reason: stated |
01-15-2019, 03:23 PM | #11 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,368
Karma: 26886344
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ireland
Device: Kindle Oasis 3, 4G, iPad Air 2, iPhone IE
|
Quote:
The gender issue does hit quite hard at the very end when Genly suddenly sees his own race from the perspective of the people of Winter. This was a direct result of the depth of his relationship with Estraven. |
|
01-15-2019, 06:01 PM | #12 | ||||||
Wizard
Posts: 1,264
Karma: 10203040
Join Date: Dec 2011
Device: a variety (mostly kindles and kobos)
|
I didn't really enjoy this book. I found it a slog. When it wasn't burying me in endless descriptions of snow and ice* it was filling the page with terms and words from the language(s) of Winter. I think a certain amount of use-the-word-then-explain-it-later works well to help build the world, too much leaves me confused.** And I never really got the whole honour code thing that a lot of the plot depends on.
Oh and the scenes on the farm? Grim. Quote:
I did read in one of the three introductions in my copy, that LeGuin intended the masculine pronouns to stand for generic ones and later regretted it. I do think it would have made it more striking if the Winter natives were constantly referred to as they/them or something. It would have jarred in a good way. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
*(whilst reading chapter 18 I accidentally skipped forward to 19 and didn't realise for several pages!) **(it would have helped if the section at the end of the book about the days of the week and months and so on were at the beginning not the end. The first chapter of Estraven's journal I thought the bits in italics were other characters, that he was describing their place in the hierarchy. It took about 3 pages to realise they were days.) |
||||||
01-15-2019, 06:49 PM | #13 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,368
Karma: 26886344
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ireland
Device: Kindle Oasis 3, 4G, iPad Air 2, iPhone IE
|
Personally, I think the introduction to the novel br Le Guin is particularly fine and well worth reading. She was reacting in part to the approach of Amis in New Maps of Hell which emphasised the extrapolation approach and also to the old traditional space opera.
I would tend to agree that the world building takes too much time and bogs things down somewhat in the early parts of the book. She does work it in through the viewpoint of Genly which makes it reasonably acceptable. (Many of the old Golden Age stories just dumped a load of exposition.) But once that is settled the pace of the story and the key relatiionship build to a fine resolution. |
01-15-2019, 07:11 PM | #14 | |
Nameless Being
|
Quote:
I definitely found it a slog, which seemed apt given that so much of it very literally was for the two lead characters. I did enjoy the book, but as a mental exercise, and an opportunity to examine a famous book and see why it was famous. It was not a fun read, and not one I'd choose to read again. Mention of China Mieville reminds me of his Embassytown which dealt at more length on some of the issues of language Le Guin raises in this book. Embassytown I both enjoyed reading for the mental stimulation and liked as a pleasant recreational read. |
|
01-15-2019, 07:26 PM | #15 | ||||
cacoethes scribendi
Posts: 5,809
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
|
Quote:
I don't think your assessment ("very little story left") is unfair, but I also think it's true of a lot of science fiction, particularly of that period but even more recent works can suffer this problem. For many sci-fi writers science/concept is king, character and plot are just there to expose the idea. Some authors, such as Le Guin, write/wrote well enough, and about the human aspects enough, to get away with it (for my tastes), others not so much. (Which isn't to say this was the case with all science fiction; Asimov remains a favourite of mine because he told good stories.) Quote:
Quote:
But an author doesn't get to decide how their books will be received. In hoping to say in words what cannot be said in words, in asking readers to interpret, we must also accept that sometimes the interpretation will not be what we expected. Quote:
The structure of the The Left Hand of Darkness effectively insists that male pronouns for generic use by Genly and Genly's perspective were most appropriate. For other parts, some other form of pronoun might have been better, and might have emphasised the difference more, but this was 1969, it is an open question how much of this sort of thing Le Guin's editors and publishers would have accepted, and getting past those, how the readers would have reacted. And, besides, even more recent books that try gender-free pronouns get mixed responses. You like Too Like the Lightning by Ada Palmer whereas I did not, and (a fairly minor) part of my dislike of that book is what I felt was clumsy emphasis of the pronoun choice. |
||||
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ursula K. Le Guin Has Died at 88 | astrangerhere | News | 26 | 02-02-2018 03:52 AM |
MobileRead August 2014 Discussion: The Dispossessed by Ursula K Le Guin (spoilers) | WT Sharpe | Book Clubs | 20 | 09-04-2014 07:55 AM |
The Left Hand of Darkness | Strether | Reading Recommendations | 10 | 07-22-2013 10:37 AM |
La Reina de la CF, Ursula K. Le Guin | cristbo | Foro Español | 0 | 10-28-2012 03:26 PM |