07-25-2019, 10:25 PM | #1 |
Fanatic
Posts: 538
Karma: 13511506
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Cleveland, OH
Device: Voyage, Oasis, Kobo Glo HD,iPad Pro, Sony 350 and T2
|
Library E-Book Lending Poses Rising Problem for Publishing Industry
Not a fan of this "windowing" technique.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/e-books...?mod=flipboard Sent from my SM-G950U1 using Tapatalk |
07-26-2019, 04:42 AM | #2 |
eReader Wrangler
Posts: 7,443
Karma: 48453105
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boise, ID
Device: PB HD3, GL3, Tolino Vision 4, Voyage, Clara HD
|
|
Advert | |
|
07-26-2019, 08:02 AM | #3 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,195
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
|
Quote:
Based on the article, the Tor experiment said that ebooks sales increase when they delay releases to the library, thus windowing makes a lot of sense. It also mentioned that other publishers are going with a pricing based on the number of lends rather than a flat price, much like Amazon pays authors in their monthly ebook service. Once again, makes business sense. |
|
07-26-2019, 08:06 AM | #4 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 6,497
Karma: 84420419
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida
Device: Kindles
|
Quote:
These days I only purchase a book if it is something I want to read immediately and there is a long hold list at the library. Last edited by jhowell; 07-26-2019 at 08:39 AM. Reason: typos |
|
07-26-2019, 08:35 AM | #5 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 5,659
Karma: 66420972
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Libra 2, iPadMini4, iPad4, MBP; support other Kobo/Kindles
|
If the Tor "experiment" were actual science, they would have simultaneously windowed half of their titles, carefully matching titles on both sides for popularity, and gone to every effort to eliminate other confounders. They did none of this.
|
Advert | |
|
07-26-2019, 09:34 AM | #6 |
Brash Fumbler
Posts: 1,159
Karma: 8710811
Join Date: May 2013
Device: NST, Kobo Mini
|
Because, you know, they're a BUSINESS. Not angling for a research grant.
|
07-26-2019, 09:38 AM | #7 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 5,659
Karma: 66420972
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Libra 2, iPadMini4, iPad4, MBP; support other Kobo/Kindles
|
Quote:
But I've been regularly quite impressed at how business and economics grads can display a level of scientific thinking well below that. Last edited by meeera; 07-26-2019 at 09:47 AM. |
|
07-26-2019, 10:46 AM | #8 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,738
Karma: 26006874
Join Date: Sep 2017
Device: PW3, Fire HD8 Gen7, Moto G7, Sansa Clip v2, Ruizu X26
|
The eBook publishers (and other digital content publishers) chose their path when they came up with the concept "You don't own this, you are just licensed to use it on our terms, that we may choose to change over time. We have ultimate control over what you can or cannot do with it, despite your payment to us."
For me, in part it has come down to this: (1) "If you BUY this eBook from us, you don't own it, but you pay for it. You only have a license to read it, and only on the devices we let you to read it on." (2) "If I BORROW this eBook from the library, I don't own it, but I don't pay for it either (other than with my taxes)." So what's the difference? You don't own it in either case. But in one case you pay for not owning it, and in the other case you don't. Is it any wonder that choice (2) may be getting more popular? My current practice for fiction novels - which has changed over time to be more library centric - is to always, ALWAYS, check the library first, and only then consider purchasing the book if the library route is unavailable/unappealing. The publishers came up with the "license, not own" concept to increase their profits and control. This was a positive for them. But there are a few negatives as well - as some customers will determine that the license concept is not in their best interest, and decide to borrow from the library instead. And naturally, the publishers wish to shut down this alternate way for customers to obtain books. It looks like they are trying "windowing" now. But rest assured, they would rather cut libraries totally out of the picture if they could. I'm sure they will attempt this total cut-off in the future, if they haven't started already. |
07-26-2019, 11:07 AM | #9 | |
Karma Kameleon
Posts: 2,934
Karma: 26616647
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: iPad Mini, iPhone X, Kindle Fire Tab HD 8, Walmart Onn
|
Quote:
Heck, you are a profligate spender if you pay for something you could get for free just as easily as buying. |
|
07-26-2019, 11:10 AM | #10 |
Karma Kameleon
Posts: 2,934
Karma: 26616647
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: iPad Mini, iPhone X, Kindle Fire Tab HD 8, Walmart Onn
|
You HAVE to have a "you don't own it" stance with a digital good. Otherwise you get "sell one copy, share infinitely".
Digital goods are inherently different. Better in many ways. Deficient in other ways. There is no such thing as a "used ebook". |
07-26-2019, 11:39 AM | #11 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,738
Karma: 26006874
Join Date: Sep 2017
Device: PW3, Fire HD8 Gen7, Moto G7, Sansa Clip v2, Ruizu X26
|
Quote:
The positive from the publishers viewpoint - licensing - is a negative from the customers viewpoint. Likewise, the positive from the customers viewpoint - libraries - is a negative from the publishers viewpoint. Sometimes it takes a long time to play out, but in the end, the customer usually wins. Because it is the customer who makes the ultimate choice - to buy or not to buy. If the current conversation is "more customers are borrowing from the libraries these days" then it is the customer who is making that decision, not the publisher. The publishers can try to remove the ability for the customer to make a choice. How often does THAT work? For those of us who have children, how well does "No, because I said so" really guide a decision you are trying to influence? |
|
07-26-2019, 02:50 PM | #12 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,631
Karma: 73864785
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: PDXish
Device: Kindle Voyage, various Android devices
|
I think this mostly shows that libraries are finally catching up on the ebook side. It has taken a while (as expected) but the libraries I have access to have nearly as good of an e-catalog as they do of a paper catalog. At least for relatively recent books.
Of course people are borrowing from the library more. They CAN now. Until libraries were able to catch up people had to buy the e-books if they want e-books. Now that there is choice the people have migrated to ebooks who used to be paper library patrons are now e-library patrons. And the percentage of people who are e-library patrons is probably a little higher than paper library patrons because is is so much more convenient to use the e-library. |
07-26-2019, 08:09 PM | #13 | |
Wizard
Posts: 2,459
Karma: 68781975
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Arkansas
Device: Paperwhite 4
|
Quote:
I think their goal wasn't high prices for ebooks but to make ebooks less attractive than print books, which are more profitable. If that's true then this latest move is right in line. When a book comes out people who want it right away will be more likely to buy the print version. Barry |
|
07-26-2019, 08:16 PM | #14 | ||
eReader Wrangler
Posts: 7,443
Karma: 48453105
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boise, ID
Device: PB HD3, GL3, Tolino Vision 4, Voyage, Clara HD
|
Quote:
Quote:
Before agency pricing, Amazon (and Barnes & Noble, probably matching Amazon) would often have major publisher eBooks on sale — sometimes they would be incredibly cheap. I think I bought the Lord of the Rings all-in-one set for $4.99, and The Hobbit for $2.99 (or maybe it was $1.99, can't remember exactly). I got the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Omnibus for about $5 or $6, even though I had already bought the hardback book. Even big, current best-sellers would go on sale cheaply. I think I bought the "Hunger Games" trilogy for $4.99. I used to buy quite a few books "spur of the moment" simply because they were on sale. Sometimes, if I really wanted the book, I would pay the "normal" price of about $10 for it. That's no longer the case with agency pricing. If some book catches my attention I'll look at the price tag — $16? No thanks. I'll put in a hold at the library if I really want to read it. I may still buy books that I want to keep for the higher prices, but the "spur of the moment" books, or general novels that I'll read and "chuck" won't get bought at these prices. It's a personal thing, I guess, but I can't see paying (essentially) hardback book prices for these novels. I still pick up some cheap independent publisher eBook novels that are on sale. So, are major eBook publishers losing money because of lending libraries? Only if you count selling to libraries as a "loss." While I borrow books from the library, that's not a loss of a sale for the publishers. If the book wasn't available at the library, I wouldn't read (or buy) it at all. And, if not for agency pricing, I may have bought it outright when on sale in the past. It's another case of corporations not recognizing the importance of changes in the market and, instead of adapting, trying to "hold back the tide." Now, as they raise their prices to libraries (or limit copies) some of them are lowering prices to book buyers — realizing too late that eBooks can be produced by just about anybody. |
||
07-26-2019, 09:11 PM | #15 | |
eReader Wrangler
Posts: 7,443
Karma: 48453105
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boise, ID
Device: PB HD3, GL3, Tolino Vision 4, Voyage, Clara HD
|
Quote:
Instead of embracing a new (more profitable) medium, the big publishers (with the help of Apple) short circuited themselves with greed. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kindle owners lending library problem | Purple Lady | Kindle Fire | 12 | 11-02-2016 12:53 PM |
Article: The publishing industry has a problem, and EPUB is not the solution - And my | avid01 | General Discussions | 6 | 09-01-2013 03:43 PM |
E-Book Piracy: The Publishing Industry's Next Epic Saga? | kjk | News | 444 | 01-02-2010 06:01 PM |