05-28-2008, 02:51 AM | #1 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,096
Karma: 4695691
Join Date: May 2008
Device: Kindle Paperwhite
|
do you ever wonder...
as far as i know, and i'm very new, no other reader can read kindle files but kindle, sony files but sony, and except for the iliad, i believe - and would LOVE to be wrong - that only the cybook can read protected mobipocket files.
i read an easy 3 - 4 books per week. after 3 or 4 years, that will represent an investment i'd hate to have to make all over in order to read the same books i've already often rebought from paper to electronic form. i've been surfing ebookstores all day. i see that protected mobipocket seems to be everywhere with the authors and titles i want. but bookeen is a small company - in 5 or 6 years, i could have to replace my entire elibrary if they fold. and yet, that could happen with the sony or the kindle. this is why i hadn't gotten a reader before. am i paranoid? microsoft did discontinue their reader, and i've seen other types of proprietary product lines suddenly retired in the course of my work. what really annoys me is that i have read everywhere that amazon owns mobipocket.com yet the kindle can't read protected mobipocket because they are pushing kindle with everything they have. i hate proprietary formats |
05-28-2008, 03:15 AM | #2 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
That's the benefit of buying MobiPocket format books - it's a format which is available on multiple hardware platforms. If you buy another eBook reader in, say, 2 or 3 years time, you're certain to be able to get one which supports Mobi. Buying Mobi books protects your investment.
Bookeen have been in the eBook reader business for over 10 years - far, far longer than either Amazon or Sony. I don't think there's much chance of them "folding" in the foreseeable future. They have an excellent product which is selling every unit that they can get their hands on. |
Advert | |
|
05-28-2008, 03:39 AM | #3 |
Addict
Posts: 370
Karma: 1553
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Melbun
Device: Kobo H2O
|
A much better plan is to not rent protected books at all. If you want to buy books you must either buy unprotected books or own the protection system (impractical for most of us). The third option is to buy effectively unprotected books that you can remove the protection from. One approach to the latter that I haven't seen for that (yet) is using an e-ink device and a camera with OCR software but I'm sure it's only a matter of time.
Currently of the $500-ish I've spent on ebooks all has gone into books that I now own copies of, rather than to books that I can only access at the pleasure of the owner. the MS lit format is excellent for that, it seems to count as DRM for publishers but it's trivial to remove for consumers. |
05-28-2008, 03:44 AM | #4 | ||
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-28-2008, 11:55 AM | #5 |
reader
Posts: 6,975
Karma: 5183568
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mississippi, USA
Device: Kindle 3, Kobo Glo HD
|
This is a real concern, but only if the DRM-provider or the place your bought your ebooks from folds. The least intrusive DRM is eReader's, because it just requires you to remember your credit card number and is otherwise transferable. Three major DRM formats: LIT, MOBI, and eReader can be broken by downloadable software tools. In the US, stripping DRM probably isn't legal even if your DRM provider goes out of business but it is nice to know this last resort is available. If you think DRM is evil, then one approach is to be proactive by buying LIT (say) and immediately striping the DRM and format shifting to be compatible whatever devices you want. LIT is the best choice in this case because it is the best "archive" format of the three (LIT, MOBI, eReader).
|
Advert | |
|
05-28-2008, 12:09 PM | #6 |
Gizmologist
Posts: 11,615
Karma: 929550
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Republic of Texas Embassy at Jackson, TN
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3
|
|
05-28-2008, 12:23 PM | #7 |
Sir Penguin of Edinburgh
Posts: 12,375
Karma: 23555235
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: DC Metro area
Device: Shake a stick plus 1
|
|
05-28-2008, 12:28 PM | #8 |
Hi There!
Posts: 7,473
Karma: 2930523
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Device: iPad
|
Does this languagge affect how the authors are paid? License vs purchase? Just curious....
|
05-28-2008, 12:43 PM | #9 |
Gizmologist
Posts: 11,615
Karma: 929550
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Republic of Texas Embassy at Jackson, TN
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3
|
I don't think so, I think it mostly affects whether you can get access to "your" books again later if you want them.
|
05-28-2008, 01:05 PM | #10 | |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
And it also affects your legal rights as far as things like resale are concerned. If you own them, you can resell them. If you don't, you probably can't.
Note that the Fictionwise "terms of use" go on to say: Quote:
|
|
05-28-2008, 01:07 PM | #11 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,366
Karma: 12000
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas, USA
Device: Kindle; Sony PRS 505; Blackberry 8700C
|
|
05-28-2008, 06:06 PM | #12 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,096
Karma: 4695691
Join Date: May 2008
Device: Kindle Paperwhite
|
i've been a paying member of rhapsody for years. despite the fact that their subscription music is DRM-protected, the format their music is in can be used by pretty much any mp3 player or device. also their music is library style - i get access to all the music in their system each month for a price. if a user chooses to buy a track, as opposed to getting the use of it for a month, they can burn it and it will play for life without "phoning home" each time you play it.
and that's why i was surprised - and dismayed - a few days ago when i started looking at how ebooks work. i'm not 100% against DRM, but the way ebooks work - proprietary formats, no way to permanently buy a book that will work with all or most readers - is disappointing. |
05-29-2008, 05:09 AM | #13 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
There's nothing inherently wrong with "proprietory formats" - most formats are "proprietory", but that doesn't automatically equate to "closed". Eg, the format of audio CDs is "proprietory" - it's owned by the Dutch company Phillips - but that doesn't prevent people from buying CDs, does it?
|
05-29-2008, 06:09 AM | #14 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
|
Quote:
|
|
05-29-2008, 07:00 AM | #15 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
It also encourages standardisation. Eg look at the early days of web browsers, when every browser implemented its own "variant" of HTML in slightly different ways. Having a single "owner" of a format is one way (certainly not the only way, of course) of ensuring compliance to a standard.
|