05-21-2013, 01:34 PM | #61 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 6,111
Karma: 34000001
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: KPW1, KA1
|
Writing down or saying what you mean *correctly* is a matter of style.
It's idiotic to say "I could care less", assuming that the other knows that "could" actually needs to be "couldn't". These words mean opposite things. Therefore you can't interchange them without looking like a fool who doesn't know the actual meaning of what he is saying. IMHO. Last edited by Katsunami; 05-21-2013 at 01:36 PM. |
05-21-2013, 02:16 PM | #62 | |
Philosopher
Posts: 2,034
Karma: 18736532
Join Date: Jan 2012
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 2 gen, Kindle Fire 1st Gen, Kindle Touch
|
Quote:
|
|
Advert | |
|
05-21-2013, 02:29 PM | #63 | |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
Posts: 71,524
Karma: 306214458
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Voyage
|
Quote:
less taxes just isn't right. |
|
05-21-2013, 02:48 PM | #64 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 6,111
Karma: 34000001
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: KPW1, KA1
|
I could care less.
But I don't, so I'll go look up the difference, as I've clearly forgotten it. Edit: Ah. Fewer is for multiple items, and less is for single items. So I'll use less items, and I'll have one fewer thing to worry about. Or something Last edited by Katsunami; 05-21-2013 at 02:54 PM. |
05-21-2013, 02:50 PM | #65 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,345
Karma: 52398889
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
Quote:
|
|
Advert | |
|
05-21-2013, 03:00 PM | #66 | |
Member Retired
Posts: 1,999
Karma: 11348924
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Limbo
Device: none
|
The point is if I don't agree with you and don't care about what you say but reply to you that I could care less, then it means I do care a little which is not what I mean which defeats the point and renders communication and meaning void.
I might as well say that "I love you and desire you and want to put a bullet in your head" And there is no way for you to know if I am hitting on you or hating you to the point of killing you or just feeling neutral towards you because I don't use words or verbs or expressions the way they are supposed to. This is not evolution, this is written and spoken language degeneracy. Quote:
Last edited by Quexos; 05-21-2013 at 03:02 PM. |
|
05-21-2013, 03:08 PM | #67 |
Member Retired
Posts: 1,999
Karma: 11348924
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Limbo
Device: none
|
That's how primitive languages and forms of communication worked. Language and communication have evolved and become complex to allow subtlety and refinement and "dumbing down" the long acquired refinement, complexity and subtlety is not how things are supposed to go, it's definitely not evolution.
|
05-21-2013, 03:32 PM | #68 |
Philosopher
Posts: 2,034
Karma: 18736532
Join Date: Jan 2012
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 2 gen, Kindle Fire 1st Gen, Kindle Touch
|
Yet when someone says "I could care less", the are communicating effectively, people understand what is meant. Therefore, it is false that communication and meaning is made void. People do use non-standard English, but they do so, they aren't failing to communicate. Language doesn't change because some committee decrees it, it changes by what people at the time will call errors.
An idiom is a phrase whose meaning cannot be deduced from the component words. "I could care less" is one of those idioms. If you want to stomp this idiom, good luck. Maybe you'll manage to do it. Last edited by QuantumIguana; 05-21-2013 at 03:48 PM. |
05-21-2013, 03:59 PM | #69 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 6,111
Karma: 34000001
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: KPW1, KA1
|
Quote:
"Invaluable" means "not having a value" in the sense that the value is so great that it cannot be measured. ("Not having a value" is different to "having no value". Don't confuse with "not having any value", which *is* the same as "having no value".) These two words do not mean different things. They actually mean the same, but in different amounts. "Invaluable" is a superlative of "valuable". I understand what you are trying to do: to point out that a word can mean something that people may not expect. When you say that "this object is invaluable", then people will know that that it hase value or worth beyond imagination. As far as I know, "invaluable" is never used to describe something without worth. One would use a word such as "worthless". Therefore: "I think this object is valuable." -> "I think this object is invaluable." This substition does not change the meaning of the sentence, which is that the object has at least some value, but it does increase the value of the object. (To an unimaginably high level, that is.) The same is true for "priceless", which is a synonym for "invaluable". Last edited by Katsunami; 05-21-2013 at 04:06 PM. |
|
05-21-2013, 05:06 PM | #70 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,345
Karma: 52398889
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
Quote:
Price is synonymous with worth, yet priceless and worthless are antonyms. The point I was making is that, according to the usual rules of English words, in- is a negative prefix. E.g., inconclusive is the opposite of conclusive, ineligible is the opposite of eligible. But then English has some words that don't follow the pattern, like invaluable and inestimable and inflammable. It's a quirky, fascinating language, and whether you approve or not, just as in- sometimes doesn't mean what it's "supposed" to mean, I couldn't care less and its apparent opposite, I could care less, mean pretty much the same thing. |
|
05-21-2013, 06:56 PM | #71 | |
Member Retired
Posts: 1,999
Karma: 11348924
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Limbo
Device: none
|
Only by extrapolation. The syntax being almost correct because the difference with the correct expression is just one word away (the word "not"). But the expression is incorrect and if you condone it then you must condone mistakes in all modern branches of knowledge and soon 1+1 will equal 3 because it's not too far from the correct answer and people "understand" what was meant. But even though you can extrapolate from the wrong result, 1+1 will never equal 3 and it is as wrong as it can ever be.
Quote:
|
|
05-21-2013, 06:58 PM | #72 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 6,111
Karma: 34000001
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: KPW1, KA1
|
Quote:
Sometimes words don't follow the patterns, fair enough. However, most people know about those words, and they have always had these special meanings. You can't take out a word out of a sentence ("not", in the case of "I could care less") which basically causes the meaning of the sentence to reverse, and then say: "It still means the same because everybody will know what I mean!". In my view, that's just ridiculous and illogical. It's sloppy use of language. |
|
05-21-2013, 07:41 PM | #73 | ||
Philosopher
Posts: 2,034
Karma: 18736532
Join Date: Jan 2012
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 2 gen, Kindle Fire 1st Gen, Kindle Touch
|
Quote:
Again, I don't use "I could care less", I'm just not joining a crusade against it. I don't need to condone anything. Quote:
|
||
05-21-2013, 08:35 PM | #74 | ||
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,345
Karma: 52398889
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
Quote:
Quote:
I could care less and I couldn't care less mean the same thing. That's just the way it is. |
||
05-21-2013, 08:40 PM | #75 |
Resident Curmudgeon
Posts: 74,177
Karma: 129333564
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
|
Actually, good taste in music got me a wife. Nothing at all to do with grammar.
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is Grammar Really That Important Any More? | Justin Nemo | Writers' Corner | 234 | 05-01-2012 02:15 PM |
Seriously thoughtful English (or US) grammar | Sweetpea | Lounge | 26 | 10-21-2011 10:17 PM |
Kid's books and grammar | ApK | Reading Recommendations | 21 | 06-21-2011 05:40 PM |
Any good free eBook for English grammar please? | erictoma | Reading Recommendations | 1 | 12-04-2010 10:54 PM |
Layout for grammar examples | Man Eating Duck | ePub | 8 | 11-28-2010 05:28 AM |