12-31-2009, 01:01 PM | #46 | ||
Wizard
Posts: 1,196
Karma: 1281258
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-505
|
Quote:
There's a market for colour in books, but it's limited. Low-resolution colour is used in some technical works and is important in children's books, but that's it. High-resolution colour for images would be nice, but we're not going to get that on an ereader any time soon, all the coming colour displays will be limited to the same sub-newsprint resolutions used on the web. There are many ways in which I'd like to see ereader displays improve, but colour isn't one of them because it's simply irrelevant to reading text. Quote:
|
||
12-31-2009, 01:02 PM | #47 | |
Opinion Artiste
Posts: 301
Karma: 61464
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Albany, OR
Device: Nexus 5, Nexus 7, Kindle Touch, Kindle Fire
|
Quote:
1) Quickly flip through the pages of a book to locate something visually. 2) Quickly scan through your library to locate a book visually. 3) Allow the USER to select their preferred reading software. 4) Allow the USER to add applications to their device. For simple novels (and similar material), sure "quickly flipping through pages" isn't THAT important. But the world of reading is far bigger than those types of things: magazines, text books, technical books, children's books, etc. Many of these require speed for fast scanning through pages. Imagine standing in front of bookshelves filled with 1000's of books, sorted the way YOU want them sorted, each book with it's own semi-distinctive spine (colors, logos, title, graphic), how EASY and QUICK it is to spot and zero-in on the book you want (even if you don't remember the exact title or spelling of the author's name). Yes, "quickly finding a book" can be done using carefully structured sub-directories and naming conventions and search routines. But navigating those on a power-hoarding machine will never come close to what you can do with that same ability AND a "visual bookshelf"... which takes speed (which usually takes power). The current eInk devices are (and will likely remain, due to their power-hoarding requirements) purely "vendor-only software" devices. Yes, there are small exceptions (running custom programs in FB reader, Open Inkpot, etc), but those are not (and never will be) terribly widely used (FB reader programs) or as QUICKLY (massively) flexible as a machine running a common, OPEN operating system onto which you can load pretty much anything (program-wise), without worrying about the power-hoarding requirements. Yes, Open Inkpot lets anyone contribute anything, but step back and look at it compared to what comes from the manufacturers, and there's really not that big of a difference, and the changes come VERY slowly (if it were anything other than a 'hobby' system, Open Inkpot would have been available for the Hanlin V5 machines IMMEDIATELY, not a year or two later). I'd gladly pay $35 to someone for a good ADE replacement that actually let me modifying formatting, etc, in a reasonable way. Instead, we're stuck waiting months and years for the manufacturers to release firmware updates with minor tweaks to the standard ADE, which never quite please ANYONE with regard to font sizes, page numbering, status bars, etc. With an 'open' system, there would be a plethora of reading programs you could load. But 'open' systems mean "power-hoarding" has to go out the window, to some degree. Give me 24-hours on a charge, and I'm willing to trade that against 2-3 weeks on a charge in order to get much greater functionality. A lot of folks seem to want nothing but a straight "novel reader", and for them, eInk is great. But there's just as many (or more) folks who would like to have their device do a few things more. You can argue about one-function devices vrs multi-function devices until a blue moon (well, okay, yeah, that's today... ), but the simple fact is that these devices are a computer, running Linux (for the most part today, but any OS will do...), and adding additional programs to them is NOT anything like adding a scanner to a printer. Am I arguing for LCD screens and 4-hour battery life? No. But technology doesn't stand still. Screen technologies will advance, battery technology will advance. Will it happen over-night? No, it will be a slow painful slog, and for a while eInk will remain superior FOR NOVEL READING to most other devices. But over 5-10 years, that will change. Because the trade-off in battery life and screen capabilities and CPU capabilities will shift enough to allow these kinds of features while still supporting "easy on the eyes" novel reading. For the folks who are intent on arguing for the sanctity of a "novel reading only" device vrs some "multi-function device", not also arguing for having a computer on their desk that ONLY does spreadsheets (but does them VERY well) and another computer that ONLY does word-processing (but does that VERY well) and so on? Because it's silly. eInk is successful today because it's the best (in terms of readability and battery life trade-offs). But that won't remain so. As screen, cpu and battery technologies advance, gray-scale eInk WILL give way to color screens with much faster updates, which will mean shorter battery life, but as long as it doesn't get TOO short, that's a trade-off that MANY people will be willing to make. Short-term, that means there will be a lot of LCD machines being introduced. But LCDs were not the first fast, color screen technology, and they won't be the last. Sorry for the length of this, but it takes lots of words to explain complex concepts. It's mostly a wasted effort, I'm sure, as very few folks are willing to change their tightly held beliefs (myself included ), but hey, we're just standing in the village square having a conversation, right? |
|
Advert | |
|
12-31-2009, 01:16 PM | #48 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,806
Karma: 13500000
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Device: Boox PB360 etc etc etc
|
2,3 and 4 have little to do with the e-ink screen. 2 has a bit to do since more color variations would make selecting a title easier but having or not having covers is not a function of the e-ink. 3 and 4 are solely do to the device makers themselves. the industry is in its infancy still and we are really only on 2nd generation devices.
|
12-31-2009, 01:17 PM | #49 | ||
Professional Contrarian
Posts: 2,045
Karma: 3289631
Join Date: Mar 2009
Device: Kindle 4 No Touchie
|
Quote:
Also, ideally eInk will continue to improve -- though clearly that's a wild card. eInk has done OK with execution, but who knows if that will continue to be the case. When LCD / Pixel Qi / etc products actually ship, we'll have a better idea. Quote:
That said, I don't have too hard a time getting around an eInk device. It definitely takes longer to flip pages, but it's also fairly easy to search for a specific word. And for me, as a Kindle user, if they ditched "locations" and went with "pages" instead, mentally it'd be much easier to hop around a book. |
||
12-31-2009, 01:25 PM | #50 | ||||
New York Editor
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
|
Quote:
At the bank I once worked for, in the 70's, we went from Selectrics to Qyx intelligent typewriters, to word processing on a DEC mini-computer to dedicated word processors like the IBM DisplayWriter. Partway through my tenure, the IBM PC came in, displacing venerable Apple ][s which ran VisiCalc. The PCs ran Lotus 1,2,3, and I watched bank officers write memos as Lotus text cells because Lotus was what they knew how to use. But the PC was a multi-function device, so things like WordStar crept in and took over. It happened because the PC hardware became cheap enough and powerful enough that a PC with Lotus 1,2,3 and WordStar was a significantly better investment than a dedicated word processor. Quote:
I'm not one, due to form factor. We want cell phones tiny and light. That means small screens, and too much of what I do on a PDA makes me wish for a bigger screen than I have. Quote:
At $50-$99, they are an impulse purchase. But we aren't going to see them at that price anytime soon. A teardown of the Kindle discussed elsewhere on MR had the eInk display unit accounting for $60 of the cost. A $99 reader is possible, but not with an eInk display. Quote:
But aside from displaying ebooks, it has all of the standard PDA functions, plus does word processing, views/edits Word docs and Excel spreadsheets, plays MP3s and videos, displays photos, has half a dozen programming languages, can connect to the net...and oh, yes, it plays games. I'd like a device that does what my PDA does, but with a larger screen. I couldn't carry it in a pocket, but I don't do that now. ______ Dennis |
||||
Advert | |
|
12-31-2009, 01:31 PM | #51 | |
Wizard
Posts: 2,300
Karma: 1121709
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Amazon Kindle 1
|
Quote:
The sites full of the stubborn folk who do nothing but read novels and get very defensive about non e-ink devices as they don't want them to go away as e-ink is perfect for novel reading. But it's a misguided and unneeded defensiveness as there's plenty of room for all types of gadgets that can access e-books. But in fairness to these folks, they are egged on by boneheads posting topics like this about the death of e-ink. Which is also misguided as there will always be a place for dedicated reader devices catering to the novel reading crowd. |
|
12-31-2009, 01:35 PM | #52 | ||
Wizard
Posts: 2,300
Karma: 1121709
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Amazon Kindle 1
|
Quote:
And besides, smart phones like the iPhone, Android etc. are still pretty thin, light and easily fit in a pocket. So it's not like smart phones are huge and a hassle to carry around. Quote:
|
||
12-31-2009, 01:40 PM | #53 | |||
Wizard
Posts: 1,385
Karma: 16056
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Asia
Device: Kindle 3 WiFi, Sony PRS-505
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It'll be nice when they can push linear resolutions approaching crappy print, and won't need all this artificial font smoothing nonsense. Many Chinese devices toss out anti-aliasing altogether as pixelated text is far easier to read than blurred and washed out text. Too bad they don't do that with ebook readers (or give users the option of doing it) |
|||
12-31-2009, 01:40 PM | #54 |
Kindlephilia
Posts: 2,017
Karma: 1139255
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Snowpacolypse 2010
Device: Too many to count
|
I had a Voyager and really liked the keyboard but I wanted a Windows phone so went with the HTC Imagio and it's really nice. Large screen but it's still LCD and I only use it to read for brief periods such as waiting in line.
|
12-31-2009, 01:59 PM | #55 | |
Illiterate
Posts: 10,279
Karma: 37848716
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Sandwich Isles
Device: Samsung Galaxy S10+, Microsoft Surface Pro
|
Quote:
|
|
12-31-2009, 01:59 PM | #56 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,248
Karma: 35000000
Join Date: Jan 2008
Device: Pocketbook
|
Size is the limiting feature of all multi-function devices. Some function will require larger human interface sizes compared to others. In the final analysis, most people choose a device that meets their primary needs well, first, and then looks at the rest of the features secondarily. For Pleasure readers, that means a 5-6 inch screen, and then whatever other features you can put in secondarily. Other people may place the reader aspect as a secondary feature, and settle for a smaller device. It varies.
I'll use myself for an example. I have a mini messenger bag of devices that I carry for travel. Contents - An ASUS EEE PC running Windows, a standard def video camera (using SD chips for storage), A Creative Designs audio player (using SD cards again), and BeBook reader (using SD chips once again), and a zippered pack of 16 SD Chips. I don't see how I can have all that functionality in a single device, much less with a single device. Maybe a 8.9 inch reader with a detachable keyboard, someday, but I'm not holding my breath. Besides if any one of my gadgets break, I have options... Of the current pack of screen technologies, Mirasole best fits my future use, if it makes it out the door and meets current specs. But I can't count on it until I see it.... |
12-31-2009, 02:04 PM | #57 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,385
Karma: 16056
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Asia
Device: Kindle 3 WiFi, Sony PRS-505
|
Quote:
Edit: Of course, perhaps people would lend me books if I got all of my friends a Nook or Kindle...hahaha. Last edited by LDBoblo; 12-31-2009 at 02:09 PM. |
|
12-31-2009, 02:11 PM | #58 | |
Wizard
Posts: 2,300
Karma: 1121709
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Amazon Kindle 1
|
Quote:
It will get used primarily for reading and marking up academic articles and books. It will replace my old Palm Pilot (which I seldom use as I mainly just use the Palm software on my PC) for my organizer. And it will get used for light web browsing and net surfing in place of buying a netbook--assuming the tablet is powerful enough to handle HD video streaming etc. which is a big reason I've decided not to buy a Netbook. Anyway, point being, one doesn't have to want a multifunction device to replace a bunch of stuff. It can still be a supplement. The primary function I want one for is marking up pdfs etc., but I'd like it to be able to do PDA, internet etc. as then it's even more functional. Otherwise it would only get used a handful of times a month when I'm actively reading articles etc. |
|
12-31-2009, 02:12 PM | #59 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,806
Karma: 13500000
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Device: Boox PB360 etc etc etc
|
|
12-31-2009, 02:15 PM | #60 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,385
Karma: 16056
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Asia
Device: Kindle 3 WiFi, Sony PRS-505
|
Quote:
Thanks for the heads up. I have to try to find one or see if someone has one who can take some pics for me to see the effects (especially in Chinese). |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anybody knows the cost of E-Ink Display | jeffreylamster | OpenInkpot | 7 | 04-24-2009 01:49 PM |
Firefox on e-ink display! | Penforhire | News | 17 | 01-24-2009 05:06 PM |
SD card with E ink Display | SoCal Bob | Sony Reader | 1 | 11-15-2006 01:44 AM |
Is e-ink really a better display than my Treo? | Bob Russell | iRex | 7 | 07-27-2006 08:08 PM |
E Ink-Paper like display | cbarnett | News | 0 | 06-27-2004 11:46 PM |