Kansas / OverDrive in Contract Talks - Page 2

CommonReader · 04-22-2011, 04:11 PM

This looks like poor planning by the libraries to me. Why didn't they negotiate a contract that puts down clear rules on how cost increases were to be calculated?

J. Strnad · 04-22-2011, 10:34 PM

Let's step back and take a look at the larger picture.

Overdrive is a for-profit company with a business model that depends on charging fees to libraries, who will give away content for free.

The money Overdrive makes has to come from somewhere. Obviously, it isn't coming from sale of the content to the end user. So where does it come from? Taxpayers.

Taxpayers are getting stingier, partly due to the recession and partly due to an ideological meme that's floating around. So where does Overdrive think the increased fees are going to come from? From libraries that are facing financial cutbacks?

Frankly, I think that Overdrive may have chosen an extremely poor business to get into: Providing a platform for giving away content subsidized by taxpayers who have already demonstrated their eagerness to throw all support of the arts away, from NPR and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting to the National Endowment for the Arts. Why would they expect taxpayers to want to pay to give away books?

I like being able to check out books for my Kobo, but really, why am I able to do this? Somebody has to pay for my books when it isn't me. Is it really reasonable to expect John Q. Public to want to do this?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Hello from Kansas	jsadd	Introduce Yourself	15	02-15-2011 08:15 AM
Greetings from Kansas!	Steven Thomas	Introduce Yourself	4	02-15-2011 08:13 AM
Hello from Kansas	rox824	Introduce Yourself	7	02-13-2011 04:43 PM
Dell Streak: $300 w/contract, $550 w/o contract	kjk	Android Devices	61	10-08-2010 07:03 PM
Hi from Kansas	plm918	Introduce Yourself	3	02-03-2009 07:23 PM

04-22-2011, 04:11 PM	#16
CommonReader Fanatic Posts: 528 Karma: 2530000 Join Date: Dec 2010 Device: Sony PRS-T3, PRS-650, Vaio Tap 11, iPad Mini	This looks like poor planning by the libraries to me. Why didn't they negotiate a contract that puts down clear rules on how cost increases were to be calculated?

04-22-2011, 10:34 PM	#17
J. Strnad Guru Posts: 915 Karma: 3537194 Join Date: Feb 2009 Device: Kobo, Kindle 3, Paperwhite	Let's step back and take a look at the larger picture. Overdrive is a for-profit company with a business model that depends on charging fees to libraries, who will give away content for free. The money Overdrive makes has to come from somewhere. Obviously, it isn't coming from sale of the content to the end user. So where does it come from? Taxpayers. Taxpayers are getting stingier, partly due to the recession and partly due to an ideological meme that's floating around. So where does Overdrive think the increased fees are going to come from? From libraries that are facing financial cutbacks? Frankly, I think that Overdrive may have chosen an extremely poor business to get into: Providing a platform for giving away content subsidized by taxpayers who have already demonstrated their eagerness to throw all support of the arts away, from NPR and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting to the National Endowment for the Arts. Why would they expect taxpayers to want to pay to give away books? I like being able to check out books for my Kobo, but really, why am I able to do this? Somebody has to pay for my books when it isn't me. Is it really reasonable to expect John Q. Public to want to do this?